Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 19:18 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 19:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,771
Own Kudos:
51,924
 [3]
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,771
Kudos: 51,924
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Mar 2026
Posts: 840
Own Kudos:
2,718
 [1]
Given Kudos: 271
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 840
Kudos: 2,718
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
dabaobao
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 541
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 541
Kudos: 1,697
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
varun325
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 01 Aug 2022
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
47
 [1]
Given Kudos: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V26
GMAT 2: 650 Q48 V32
GPA: 3.46
GMAT 2: 650 Q48 V32
Posts: 77
Kudos: 47
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Total Time Taken : 8 minutes & 3/3 correct

PARA 1:
Investment banks, worried about fluctuation in the currencies of developing nations, planed to create a tool that can predict the currencie value. Economists created risk tools for the same purpose.

PARA2:
WHAT IS CURRENCY CRISIS? A-10% FALL OF CURRENCY.Now researchers studied the trend of the past 10 years and suggested three things that can help predict crisis.

PARA 3:
Now IMF comes in action and it doubts the viabilty of the plan citing the reason that it is dependent on previous year data.

PARA4: A & C , two economists from IMF, further does an study to prove that the tools are useless.Two example are cited in which the tools would have suggested inaccurately.



1. The passage is chiefly concerned with

A. warning that attempting to predict currencies fluctuations is a useless enterprise. Warnng is a strong word. Doubts are raised rather.
B. advocating the indispensable role of the IMF in stabilizing the currencies of countries to which capitalism is relatively new. IMF is only mentioned in one para & IMF just raised doubts on the viability of the tools nothing else.
C. expressing doubts as to the reliability of some new attempts to predict financial phenomena( correct). Connect the dots of the passages and the result is this option choice.
D. contrasting new and sophisticated financial models with older methods that are more concerned with careful research. No contrast given
E. recommending that better investor models be created before one isolated contagion leads to worldwide recession. Take a closer look nothing is recommended in the passage. The tools are not usefull.THATS IT



2. Which of the following does the passage suggest about South Korea?

A. It has received financial consultation and support from the IMF. Completely Incorrect
IMF is in 3rd para while South Korea in 4th para.
B. Its currency recently devalued by more than 10 percent. CORRECT Last para , In the example of philippines, It is stated that the tools would not have been able to predict the crisis of South Korea which is still recovering from the Economic disaster.
C. Its economy is currently growing slower than that of the Philippines.No comparision SORRY INCORRECT
D. The new risk indicators would have detected its economic downturn had they been in place several years ago. No the risk indicators would not have indicated the crisis that occured in S.K.
E. Its currency is closely tied to the American dollar. NO WAY this is out of scope

3. Which of the following, if it happened soon after this article was published, would undermine the skepticism toward the viability of the “risk indicator” models?

A. The value of the Filipino peso plummeted.As per the study of B & P as mentioned in last para the tolls would have predicted an economic crisi in Philippines. ( CORRECT)
B. Berg and Pattillo resigned from the IMF. This is funny ( Incorrect)
C. The South Korean economy showed signs of slowing down further.
D. Thailand restored its connection to the American dollar.
E. The IMF changed its definition of a currency crisis to an 8 percent drop in value. ( Doesnt matter whether 8% or 10% on the viability of tools.
User avatar
SiffyB
Joined: 23 Jan 2019
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 164
Own Kudos:
339
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Posts: 164
Kudos: 339
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Took a total of 4 minutes 9 second and got 3/3 correct.

(02:57)
1. The passage is chiefly concerned with

A. warning that attempting to predict currencies fluctuations is a useless enterprise
B. advocating the indispensable role of the IMF in stabilizing the currencies of countries to which capitalism is relatively new
C. expressing doubts as to the reliability of some new attempts to predict financial phenomena
D. contrasting new and sophisticated financial models with older methods that are more concerned with careful research
E. recommending that better investor models be created before one isolated contagion leads to worldwide recession

This is a very straightforward question with easy choices to eliminate. The passage starts off by introducing a new method that can predict the currency fluctuations on the basis on historical data, among other factors. The information about IMF being skeptical about this method is given and the experiment done to further emphasize this suspicion is discussed. Clearly, the passage as a whole expresses doubt about the new model. This is discussed in option (C).


(00:28)
2. Which of the following does the passage suggest about South Korea?

A. It has received financial consultation and support from the IMF.
B. Its currency recently devalued by more than 10 percent.
C. Its economy is currently growing slower than that of the Philippines.
D. The new risk indicators would have detected its economic downturn had they been in place several years ago.
E. Its currency is closely tied to the American dollar.

Note that the passage talks about South Korea in the fourth passage. From what is stated in the passage, I inferred that while Philippines did not undergo a currency crisis, South Korea and Thailand did. Now shift your attention to the second passage.
When does a currency crisis happen?
When there is at least 10 percent drop in a currency’s real value. Thus, it can be inferred that South Korea's currency underwent at least 10% drop in value.
Hope that helps!

(00:45)
3. Which of the following, if it happened soon after this article was published, would undermine the skepticism toward the viability of the “risk indicator” models?

A. The value of the Filipino peso plummeted.
B. Berg and Pattillo resigned from the IMF.
C. The South Korean economy showed signs of slowing down further.
D. Thailand restored its connection to the American dollar.
E. The IMF changed its definition of a currency crisis to an 8 percent drop in value.

The passage states that "two models would have sounded a more severe alarm toward the Philippines, which has not undergone a currency crisis'. What if the Philippines not undergo a currency crisis? That would definitely mean that the model predicted this coming. The skepticism towards these models would be undermined, right? This is stated in choice (A) - the correct option.
User avatar
Adi88
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Aug 2017
Last visit: 09 Jun 2021
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 430
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39 (Online)
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39 (Online)
Posts: 49
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is how I read and analysed the passage. (7 Mins and all questions Correct). Words highlighted in "Red" means Key Words, in "Grey" means details,those I am allowed to rush through to skip, and in "Green" means structural word)

Inspired by a wave of uncertainty about currencies in several emerging markets in recent years, many investment banks are beginning to market their versions of a new investment tool designed to predict when a currency’s value will decline sharply. Many academics and economists have combined their efforts to create these “risk indicators” in order to predict when financial turmoil in a nascent capitalist market is forthcoming.

Notes : Inv Bnk ---> New Tool to Dec in Curr Val

Creators of this new model define a currency crisis as a drop of at least 10 percent in a currency’s real value. Working with a list of all of the currency crises that have occurred within the past ten years, researchers suggest a number of market or economic variables that may have helped bring the crashes about. Such factors include a country’s exchange-rate overvaluation, slowing economic growth, or a rising debt burden. Statisticians then use sophisticated econometrics to look for relationships between these factors and the currency dips they may have caused.

Notes : Def of Crisis and Details

Representatives of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) question whether these new models are any improvement over the techniques that are currently in place. The risk indicators, the IMF argues, are too dependent on the benefit of hindsight and cannot account for any new economic phenomena that may arise. The IMF has also accused some of the investment banks of “data mining,” whereby analysts configure the information they cull from various sources until they finally verify the conclusion they have conditioned themselves to seek.

Notes : IMF Criticize

Further skepticism has been fueled by a comparison study of the risk indicator models, which was convened by Andrew Berg and Catherine Pattillo, a pair of IMF economists. After funneling economic data through each of the three most prominent models, Berg and Pattillo determined that none would have accurately predicted Asia’s currency freefall that began when Thailand’s baht was dislodged from its American dollar standard in July 1997. In fact, two models would have sounded a more severe alarm toward the Philippines, which has not undergone a currency crisis, than for either South Korea or Thailand, whose respective recoveries may never be complete.

Notes : Further Critic
User avatar
jayarora
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2025
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
238
 [1]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.61
Products:
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
Posts: 159
Kudos: 238
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SajjadAhmad
Project RC Butler 2020 - Participate and win GMAT Club Tests.
Passage # 85, Date: 13-May-2020
This post is a part of Project RC Butler 2020. Click here for Details

Inspired by a wave of uncertainty about currencies in several emerging markets in recent years, many investment banks are beginning to market their versions o fa new investment tool designed to predict when a currency’s value will decline sharply. Many academics and economists have combined their efforts to create these “risk indicators” in order to predict when financial turmoil in a nascent capitalist market is forthcoming.

Creators of this new model define a currency crisis as a drop of at least 10 percent in a currency’s real value. Working with a list of all of the currency crises that have occurred within the past ten years, researchers suggest a number of market or economic variables that may have helped bring the crashes about. Such factors include a country’s exchange-rate overvaluation, slowing economic growth, or a rising debt burden. Statisticians then use sophisticated econometrics to look for relationships between these factors and the currency dips they may have caused.

Representatives of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) question whether these new models are any improvement over the techniques that are currently in place. The risk indicators, the IMF argues, are too dependent on the benefit of hindsight and cannot account for any new economic phenomena that may arise. The IMF has also accused some of the investment banks of “data mining,” whereby analysts configure the information they cull from various sources until they finally verify the conclusion they have conditioned themselves to seek.

Further skepticism has been fueled by a comparison study of the risk indicator models, which was convened by Andrew Berg and Catherine Pattillo, a pair of IMF economists. After funneling economic data through each of the three most prominent models, Berg and Pattillo determined that none would have accurately predicted Asia’s currency freefall that began when Thailand’s baht was dislodged from its American dollar standard in July 1997. In fact, two models would have sounded a more severe alarm toward the Philippines, which has not undergone a currency crisis, than for either South Korea or Thailand, whose respective recoveries may never be complete.

1. The passage is chiefly concerned with

A. warning that attempting to predict currencies fluctuations is a useless enterprise
B. advocating the indispensable role of the IMF in stabilizing the currencies of countries to which capitalism is relatively new
C. expressing doubts as to the reliability of some new attempts to predict financial phenomena
D. contrasting new and sophisticated financial models with older methods that are more concerned with careful research
E. recommending that better investor models be created before one isolated contagion leads to worldwide recession


2. Which of the following does the passage suggest about South Korea?

A. It has received financial consultation and support from the IMF.
B. Its currency recently devalued by more than 10 percent.
C. Its economy is currently growing slower than that of the Philippines.
D. The new risk indicators would have detected its economic downturn had they been in place several years ago.
E. Its currency is closely tied to the American dollar.


3. Which of the following, if it happened soon after this article was published, would undermine the skepticism toward the viability of the “risk indicator” models?

A. The value of the Filipino peso plummeted.
B. Berg and Pattillo resigned from the IMF.
C. The South Korean economy showed signs of slowing down further.
D. Thailand restored its connection to the American dollar.
E. The IMF changed its definition of a currency crisis to an 8 percent drop in value.


(14)


Summary:

Para 1: Many IBs are coming up with a "conversion tool".
Para 2: Causes of such a crash and how they are being used to predict it
Para 3: IMF peeps are not too happy about this tool. Two drawbacks mentioned
Para 4: Further criticism illustrated with a particular example

Passage is concerned with presenting criticism about a tool

1. The passage is chiefly concerned with

A. warning that attempting to predict currencies fluctuations is a useless enterprise
B. advocating the indispensable role of the IMF in stabilizing the currencies of countries to which capitalism is relatively new
C. expressing doubts as to the reliability of some new attempts to predict financial phenomena In line with our summary
D. contrasting new and sophisticated financial models with older methods that are more concerned with careful research
E. recommending that better investor models be created before one isolated contagion leads to worldwide recession


2. Which of the following does the passage suggest about South Korea?

A. It has received financial consultation and support from the IMF.
B. Its currency recently devalued by more than 10 percent. South Korea or Thailand, whose respective recoveries may never be complete Although I feel this choice is the best among 5, it is not 100 percent supported as we do not know if the devaluation was RECENT. Moreover this 10 percent definition comes from the creators of this tool (and not from the author) so once again I was not too happy choosing this one but other answer choices are outright incorrect.
C. Its economy is currently growing slower than that of the Philippines.
D. The new risk indicators would have detected its economic downturn had they been in place several years ago.
E. Its currency is closely tied to the American dollar.

3. Which of the following, if it happened soon after this article was published, would undermine the skepticism toward the viability of the “risk indicator” models?

A. The value of the Filipino peso plummeted. This was used as a skepticism against the models because it had not happened. If this event followed, then models would have made a right prediction :)
B. Berg and Pattillo resigned from the IMF.
C. The South Korean economy showed signs of slowing down further.
D. Thailand restored its connection to the American dollar.
E. The IMF changed its definition of a currency crisis to an 8 percent drop in value.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts