2. Which of the following CANNOT be inferred from the passage?The passage presents the coffeehouse as an important center of political, commercial, and intellectual exchange in eighteenth-century England. It emphasizes that coffeehouses spread news, hosted debate, and helped circulate ideas, and it suggests that some scholars connect them to the rise of the Enlightenment. So the correct answer must be the one that goes beyond what the passage actually supports.
(A) Coffeehouses in 18th-century London could be scenes of fervent verbal disagreement.
This can be inferred. The passage says many coffeehouses were devoted to political parties or impassioned cultural debates, which strongly suggests heated disagreement.
(B) Samuel Pepys maintained no formal office space in which to conduct his business.
This cannot be inferred. The passage says the coffeehouse was “virtually his office space,” but that does not prove he had no formal office elsewhere.
(C) A major historical development in Europe is believed by some scholars to have been fostered by what transpired in the coffeehouses.
This can be inferred. The passage says some scholars credit the coffeehouses with helping fuel the Enlightenment, which is a major European historical development.
(D) The author believes that Macaulay's History of England is a credible source of information about social mores in 18th-century London.
This can be inferred. The author refers to it as Macaulay’s “classic work” and uses it as support, which suggests respect for its credibility.
(E) The role of news runners was integral to the functioning of 18th-century English coffeehouses as hubs of information.
This can be inferred. The passage says newsletters were distributed and runners brought breaking news, helping make coffeehouses nerve centers of information.
Answer: (B)