Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 18:35 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 18:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
DerekLin
Joined: 26 Nov 2023
Last visit: 27 Feb 2024
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
1,770
 [34]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 42
Kudos: 1,770
 [34]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
32
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,852
Own Kudos:
7,133
 [7]
Given Kudos: 213
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,852
Kudos: 7,133
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,852
Own Kudos:
7,133
 [5]
Given Kudos: 213
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,852
Kudos: 7,133
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
DerekLin
Joined: 26 Nov 2023
Last visit: 27 Feb 2024
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 42
Kudos: 1,770
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@MartyMurray Could you explain this
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,852
Own Kudos:
7,133
 [5]
Given Kudos: 213
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,852
Kudos: 7,133
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Explanation for Question 2

2. Which of the following statements, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claims regarding the state of trade and trade law in the UK prior to 1850?

To determine which choice "most strongly supports the author’s claims regarding the state of trade and trade law in the UK prior to 1850," we must understand what that claim is.

We see the following in the second paragraph:

To say there was no “law of trademarks” does not mean that there were no laws regulating misrepresentation in trade. However, the protection afforded to traders who found themselves victims of the fraudulent imitation of their marks was scattered across different sources (trade-specific statutes or maverick judicial decisions) and lacked any unifying logic.

So, the correct answer will support the claim that, basically, "laws regulating misrepresentation in trade" or providing protection against "fraudulent imitation" were a complex mess.

A. In the UK prior to 1850, consumers paid little attention to traders’ marks in choosing which goods to buy.

This statement about what consumers paid attention to does not mean that the laws were a complex mess.

Eliminate.

B. Prior to 1850, British traders were responsible for the largest proportion of goods sold to the British colonies.

This statement about the proportion of goods sold by British traders does not mean that the laws were a complex mess.

Eliminate.

C. In the UK prior to 1850, cutlery makers, clothiers, and artists each developed separate regulations regarding fraudulent imitation in their respective fields.

The fact that each of these groups had separate regulations regarding fraudulent imitation is an example of laws regulating fraudulent imitation being a complex mess.

So, this choice provides support for the author's claim.

Keep.

D. Prior to 1850, the UK adopted its first comprehensive law setting minimum quality standards for various products.

The fact that, prior to 1850, the UK had a comprehensive law setting mininum quality standards does not seem to support or conflict with the author's claim since the author's claim is about laws "regulating misrepresentation in trade" and those against "fraudulent imitation," rather than those "setting ... quality standards."

At the same time, in case we aren't 100 percent sure that "laws setting ... quality standards" are not somehow related to the author's claim about "the state of trade," we can eliminate this choice anyway by noticing the following. The fact that there was a "comprehensive law" would conflict with, rather than support, the claim that the state of trade and trade law was a complex mess.

Eliminate.

E. Prior to 1850, British traders were usually unaware when someone used their marks fraudulently.

This fact about what traders were aware of does not indicate that the trade laws were a complex mess.

Eliminate.

Correct answer: C
User avatar
kabirgandhi
Joined: 11 Oct 2024
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q85 V84 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 715 Q88 V88 DI81
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 715 Q88 V88 DI81
Posts: 77
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi MartyMurray,

Thank you for the explanation!

Just one question from my side: How did you identify the exact claim we had to strengthen?

The passage does not really explicitly say pre-1850, even though the state of affairs existing in and before 1850 is implied in multiple passages.

I could not determine what the exact claim that the author wanted us to strengthen here was - since information about that is given in multiple places in the passage.

For eg, claim 1: Trademark laws did not take shape until the 1850's / did not exist pre-1850\
claim 2: To say there was no “law of trademarks” does not mean that there were no laws regulating misrepresentation in trade.
claim 3: By 1850, the complex state of the body of these laws was a real cause of inconvenience and expense to traders who wished to gain protection in the UK for their trademarks.
MartyMurray
­Explanation for Question 2

2. Which of the following statements, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claims regarding the state of trade and trade law in the UK prior to 1850?

To determine which choice "most strongly supports the author’s claims regarding the state of trade and trade law in the UK prior to 1850," we must understand what that claim is.

We see the following in the second paragraph:

To say there was no “law of trademarks” does not mean that there were no laws regulating misrepresentation in trade. However, the protection afforded to traders who found themselves victims of the fraudulent imitation of their marks was scattered across different sources (trade-specific statutes or maverick judicial decisions) and lacked any unifying logic.

So, the correct answer will support the claim that, basically, "laws regulating misrepresentation in trade" or providing protection against "fraudulent imitation" were a complex mess.

A. In the UK prior to 1850, consumers paid little attention to traders’ marks in choosing which goods to buy.

This statement about what consumers paid attention to does not mean that the laws were a complex mess.

Eliminate.

B. Prior to 1850, British traders were responsible for the largest proportion of goods sold to the British colonies.

This statement about the proportion of goods sold by British traders does not mean that the laws were a complex mess.

Eliminate.

C. In the UK prior to 1850, cutlery makers, clothiers, and artists each developed separate regulations regarding fraudulent imitation in their respective fields.

The fact that each of these groups had separate regulations regarding fraudulent imitation is an example of laws regulating fraudulent imitation being a complex mess.

So, this choice provides support for the author's claim.

Keep.

D. Prior to 1850, the UK adopted its first comprehensive law setting minimum quality standards for various products.

The fact that, prior to 1850, the UK had a comprehensive law setting mininum quality standards does not seem to support or conflict with the author's claim since the author's claim is about laws "regulating misrepresentation in trade" and those against "fraudulent imitation," rather than those "setting ... quality standards."

At the same time, in case we aren't 100 percent sure that "laws setting ... quality standards" are not somehow related to the author's claim about "the state of trade," we can eliminate this choice anyway by noticing the following. The fact that there was a "comprehensive law" would conflict with, rather than support, the claim that the state of trade and trade law was a complex mess.

Eliminate.

E. Prior to 1850, British traders were usually unaware when someone used their marks fraudulently.

This fact about what traders were aware of does not indicate that the trade laws were a complex mess.

Eliminate.

Correct answer: C
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts