This passage explores the "Dialogue Comedy" of the 1930s and 1940s, a genre where the scriptwriter often rivaled the director in importance. It highlights how these films used sharp wit to subtly critique Hollywood's own superficial values.
Question 1(A) Incorrect. While the passage mentions that dialogue comedy relied on compelling performances to "make the talk come alive," it does not state that
most American films of the era (which include non-comedies) were characterized by compelling acting.
(B) Incorrect. The passage focuses specifically on dialogue comedies. It
does not suggest that action and dialogue in most films of that era were primarily comic.
(C) Correct. The text explicitly states: "Like most American films of this period, the dialogue comedy used visual images primarily to support talk." This confirms that subordinating visuals to dialogue was a general characteristic of the era's filmmaking.
(D) Incorrect. The passage notes that what made dialogue comedy distinctive was the "extremely high quality of the talk." This implies that the dialogue in "most" other films of the period was not of that same high quality.
(E) Incorrect. The passage mentions that writers sometimes "overwhelmed" directors, but it
does not characterize the general industry as being in a state of "constant rivalry."
Question 2(A) Incorrect. The passage refers to
Robert Riskin as a "writer," specifically contrasting him against "weak directors."
(B) Incorrect. While Riskin and Charles Lederer are both mentioned as examples of clever writers, there is
no mention of them being coauthors on the same scripts.
(C) Incorrect. The passage discusses his artistic influence and "clever scripts," but
never mentions his financial status.(D) Correct. The passage identifies Robert Riskin and Charles Lederer as writers whose scripts were so powerful they could exert more influence over a film than the director.
(E) Incorrect. The passage mentions Riskin in the first paragraph and Sturges in the third. It
never suggests Sturges "overshadowed" Riskin; rather, they are both presented as masters of the form.
Question 3(A) Correct. The passage says that the facts about powerful writers "contradict the assumption held by many critics today that the director is a film’s prime mover." Therefore, these critics must believe that the director—not the writer—is the main influence.
(B) Incorrect. The critics' views on the success of comedy versus other genres are
never mentioned.(C) Incorrect. This is the
opposite of what the critics believe. This is the "fact" that contradicts the critics' assumption.
(D) Incorrect. The passage
compares writers to directors, not to actors, in the context of the critics' "prime mover" theory.
(E) Incorrect. Studio loyalty is not a topic associated with the critics' beliefs in this text.
Question 4(A) Incorrect. While Sturges was a master of the genre, the
passage doesn't credit him alone with the "public success" of the entire movement.
(B) Incorrect. The passage says the best comedies (including Sturges’) engaged in a
"subtle and sly rebellion" against the studio system.
(C) Correct. The passage states: "No director made better dialogue comedies than Preston Sturges, primarily because no one wrote better comic dialogue." This confirms he performed both roles.
(D) Incorrect. While it mentions Henry James wrote fiction, it
never says Sturges wrote novels.(E) Incorrect. It compares Sturges' style to Howard Hawks' (both masters of "lightning pace"), but
never says they were associates or worked together.Question 5(A) Correct. Paragraph 2 discusses the
"unique aesthetic" of these films, their rebellion against the studio system, their targets (love, success, propriety), and their underlying moral values.
(B) Incorrect. While it mentions "earlier American film comedies" in the last sentence, the bulk of the
paragraph is about the dialogue comedies themselves, not a sustained comparison.
(C) Incorrect. The author
analyzes and praises the era but does not issue a call to action or advocate for a modern return to it.
(D) Incorrect. While the paragraph mentions the "rigid Hollywood studio system," its primary focus is on how the films reacted to that system,
not a direct historical attack on the system itself.(E) Incorrect. The roles of writer and director are the
primary focus of Paragraph 1, not Paragraph 2.
Question 6(A) Incorrect. "Sentimental" implies an excess of emotion or nostalgia. The author's
tone is analytical and appreciative, not overly emotional.
(B) Correct. The author describes these values as "more human and sensible" than the clichés they replaced. This choice of words indicates a clear positive judgment.
(C) Incorrect. "Disinterested" means unbiased or having no stake. The
author clearly takes a side by calling the values "sensible."
(D) Incorrect. The author is
skeptical of the Hollywood clichés, but not of the "human and sensible" values the films implied.
(E) Incorrect. The author
values these insights; he does not dismiss them.
Question 7(A) Incorrect. The passage suggests the
rebellion was "sly" and "clever," which aligns with being insightful.
(B) Incorrect. The author’s positive tone suggests the
rebellion was seen as a "sensible" improvement.(C) Incorrect. The passage suggests the
rebellion was a "developed unique aesthetic," implying it was intended.
(D) Incorrect. The passage
doesn't comment on repetition, and while "coy," the rebellion was a "bite," which isn't necessarily polite.
(E) Correct. The passage
describes the rebellion as "subtle and sly," and "coy," and notes that the films appeared to "subscribe to" the conventions they were undermining. This is the opposite of being "glaring" (obvious) or "clumsy."
Question 8(A) Incorrect. The passage
does not mention melodrama or plot turns in earlier comedies.
(B) Incorrect. While earlier comedies (like silent films) did rely on stunts, this specific
paragraph focuses on the "sting of sincerity" and "pretentious gentility."(C) Incorrect. This is a characteristic attributed to the dialogue comedies of the 30s and 40s.
(D) Correct. The final sentence of paragraph 2 states: "As in earlier American film comedies, the sting of sincerity exploded the balloon of pretentious gentility."
"Pretentious gentility" is a form of affected (fake/snobbish) social behavior.(E) Incorrect. This is
specifically attributed to Preston Sturges in paragraph 3, not to earlier comedies.Question 9(A) Incorrect. The passage compares Sturges' pace to Hawks, but
doesn't say Hawks imitated Sturges’ camera work.(B) Correct. The passage refers to the "conventional American film two-shot."
Since it was already "conventional," Sturges did not invent it; he simply relied on it to facilitate his dialogue-heavy style.
(C) Incorrect. The passage says it was a "conventional American film" shot, which
suggests it was used widely across the industry, not just in comedies.(D) Incorrect. The passage says this technique "directly determined" his ability to capture the "good talk" that made his films burst with life. Thus,
it was a factor in his success.(E) Incorrect. The passage says the
two-shot was used specifically to "capture the faces of characters who talk," not for action.