ExpertsGlobal5
Benjamin Franklin once said that the only two certainties in life are death and taxes, and the residents of some European countries can add tax upon death to that list. Inheritance tax is what one pays if one’s collective asset exceeds a minimum threshold. Inheritance laws are surrounded in controversy because the theoretical basis as to why one pays the tax in the first place has been deemed dubious. Even so, inheritance tax is likely to be sticking around for some time.
Inheritance tax was introduced in European countries in the 1790s and stemmed from the influence of the French Revolution, the influence of the ideas of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. The French Revolution philosophy led to the perception of the then current French system as keeping the rich wealthy and poor excluded, as money was simply handed down to the already wealthy. The concept of inheritance tax was introduced to interrupt the legacy of inherited wealth and protect the poorer members of society. In spirit, an inheritance tax was meant to redistribute wealth, taking money from the very rich via taxes and redistributing that money amongst the population.
The cited problem with this ideology is that the money earned has been taxed throughout a person’s life, and so to tax it again upon death is unfair. Another concern is that it is not exclusively the very wealthy who get taxed and that the particularly affluent are anyway likely to have financial advisors in place who will have already found means to reduce the taxable amounts. In reality, inheritance tax often hits those who just meet the threshold hardest; they may have spent their whole lives building up financial security to pass on to their children only to have it hugely reduced upon death. In this instance, the revolutionary vision of the redistribution of wealth fails.
1. Which of the following best describes the usage of the term “the theoretical basis” (see highlighted text) in the context of the first paragraph?
A. To justify the collection of the inheritance tax when assets exceed a theoretical minimum threshold
B. To explain why the inheritance tax is likely to be sticking around
C. To question the basis of all tax collection
D. To indicate doubt regarding the need for the inheritance tax
E. To support the inheritance tax because it has a strong theoretical base
2. Which of the following, if true since the time inheritance tax was introduced, would most tend to weaken the conclusions drawn about the failure of the revolutionary vision (see highlighted text)?
A. The average earning of the poorest families has risen steadily.
B. The richest and poorest families have been known to change every two generations.
C. Some extremely wealthy families are not so wealthy anymore.
D. Tax is levied only upon those individuals owning assets over a certain level.
E. The poor families are aided by the governments in meeting their basic needs.
3. Which of the following statements is least consistent with the passage?
A. Some European citizens have a reason to believe that there are three certainties in life.
B. Taxing the same amount twice is unfair.
C. The inheritance tax will always remain, despite its controversial nature.
D. Inheritance tax can be reduced with sound financial planning.
E. There was no inheritance tax in France before the French Revolution.
|
This Daily Butler Question was provided by
Experts' Global
|
|
Sponsored
|
|
|
This is a RC Butler
Check the links to other Butler Projects:
1. Which of the following best describes the usage of the term “the theoretical basis” (see highlighted text) in the context of the first paragraph?A. To justify the collection of the inheritance tax when assets exceed a theoretical minimum threshold.
To justify collection we have the inheritance laws, which clearly define when an inheritance tax is being collected. This doesn’t speak about the theoretical basis, thus wrong.
B. To explain why the inheritance tax is likely to be sticking around.
Passage 1 says, inheritance tax even though dubious, is likely to stick around for some time. This doesn’t address the highlighted text. Thus, wrong.
C. To question the basis of all tax collection.
The entire passage is about inheritance tax, while this option speaks about all taxes. Which is completely irrelevant to the context. Thus, wrong.
D. To indicate doubt regarding the need for the inheritance tax.This is the correct answer. In the first para : these lines “
Inheritance laws are surrounded in controversy because the theoretical basis as to why one pays the tax in the first place has been deemed dubious. “ .
The controversial nature of why one pays this tax at the first instance seems uncertain or unconvincing.
E. To support the inheritance tax because it has a strong theoretical base.
The highlighted text is not about supporting the inheritance tax, but raising the doubt that inheritance tax doesn’t have a theoretical basis on why it’s being collected. Thus, wrong.
Option D 2. Which of the following, if true since the time inheritance tax was introduced, would most tend to weaken the conclusions drawn about the failure of the revolutionary vision (see highlighted text)?
First of all let’s understand what the conclusion - In this instance, revolutionary vision of the redistribution of wealth is going to fail.
so, what’s the revolutionary vision. It’s the passing of inheritance laws post French Revolution to bridge the yawning gap between the rich and poor. So, to facilitate the redistribution of wealth by taxing the rich, who own properties, and are inherited generations after generations.
Why does it fail now? Because, the poor people after generations have hard earned a property which has
just exceeded the inheritance threshold, and is now taxed heavily.
A. The average earning of the poorest families has risen steadily.
Average Is usually a dicey term, as it deals with extremes. So, cannot be sure of which section the option is speaking. Hence, Wrong.
B. The richest and poorest families have been known to change every two generations.If this tide happens every two generations, then everyone is taxed and the wealth redistribution takes place in a cycled manner. Thus, the conclusion redistribution of wealth fails seems void and doesn’t hold any base. Thus, Correct weakening option.
C. Some extremely wealthy families are not so wealthy anymore.
After crossing the threshold, if you amass wealth 1000x times, you are taxed, and if u have just inherited 5x more than threshold also you are taxed. This comparative statement doesn’t make a difference, as both section is taxed and wealth redistribution occurs in the form taxes. Insufficient data. Hence, Wrong.
D. Tax is levied only upon those individuals owning assets over a certain level.
This is a factual statement made clear at the first paragraph itself. Hence, Wrong.
E. The poor families are aided by the governments in meeting their basic needs.
This option is about a welfare state and how it takes care of its citizens. Thus, out of context. Hence, Wrong.
Option B3. Which of the following statements is least consistent with the passage?A. Some European citizens have a reason to believe that there are three certainties in life.
The initial few lines mentions quoting Benjamin Franklins verse that
once they said there are two uncertainties- death and taxes. Which means till now, two taxes existed. But, for few European residents, we can add tax till death as the third uncertainty. So, this is consistent.
B. Taxing the same amount twice is unfair.
At the beginning of the third para , these lines :
“
The cited problem with this ideology is that the money earned has been taxed throughout a person’s life, and so to tax it again upon death is unfair”. This clearly shows that double taxation is unfair. Hence, Consistent. C. The inheritance tax will always remain, despite its controversial nature.The end of first paragraph mentions “
Even so, inheritance tax is likely to be sticking around for some time”. Two things seems contradicting - one always remain, but the passage speaks about likely to remain ( probably remaining). Secondly, it doesn’t remain always, but only for some time. So, this option seems less consistent.
D. Inheritance tax can be reduced with sound financial planning.
This is explained in third paragraph among the lines - “
particularly affluent are anyway likely to have financial advisors in place who will have already found means to reduce the taxable amounts“. Which clearly explains without doubt that inheritance tax can be reduced. We are not concerned if it’s for the wealthy affluent or the poorer sections. Hence, Consistent.
E. There was no inheritance tax in France before the French Revolution
It’s the French Revolution, which bought about the inheritance law to enable redistribution of wealth from rich to poor people. The second para - “
Inheritance tax was introduced in European countries in the 1790s and stemmed from the influence of the French Revolution“ is a perfect evidence to support French Revolution caused the genesis of Inheritance laws. Thus, Consistent.
Option C