passage 1= introduction about Dr thompson and her ten year battle to promote use of renewable energy sources among major corp in usa.
passage 2= introducing two formidable obstacles she faced. one was const inefficiency about renewable energy and other was lobbying power of fossil fuel industry.
passage 3= talks about her nationwide campaign and how that changed the things in her side.
passage 4= talks about her integrating coalition into international renewable energy alliance and reasoning behind it.
Q-1.
passage 1 says that with thompsons effort helped transform corporate leaders attitude towards sustainability. and in 2021 they agreed they by 2030, they would be transitioning to renewable energy sources. so basically the skepticism of corporate leaders was turned away by thompson and her work. Choice C talks about that.
Q-2. so in second passage author uses the word UNDERSTANDABLE to say that corporate leaders concerns were genuine about renewable energy.
A it wasnt about sympathy to promote the coalition. reject.
B actually the whole passage was about the obstacle faced by thompson but the word was not for that. reject.
C not at all. this is out of context here. reject.
D yes. this clearly capture the essence of that word and meaning of it. also it matches what i said in the beginning. so keep.
E not about the regret from corporate leaders. utterly rubbish here.
Q-3.
A at the end of passage 2, this is mentioned that there was obstacle of lobbying power of fossil fuel industry. so this choice can be enough to state that message. keep.
B no mention of such activity from company side, reject.
C passage never mentions about corp developing any unified policies with little oppositions.
D this is out of scope. nothing like this. reject.
E no, the passage only talks about corp getting incentives and subsidies in late 2010s.
Q-4.
A we dont know how she initiated the founding of coalition. only thing we are told is that she led the coalition and brought some changes with her consistent efforts. so reject.
B perfect. last passage talks about this.
C passage only talks about her reasoning behind integrating coalition into international renewable energy alliance but never mentioned anything about her influence on the agreement. reject.
D passage never talks about her influence on federal incentives at all. nothing has been said about who initiated those incentives. what we were told is that those incentives were enough to convince leaders to move toward renewable energy. reject.
E this is nowhere near to whats been discussed in passage. reject.
Q-5
A no they were not enthusiastic at all. reject.
B yes. this is mentioned in passage 2.
C not at all.
D this is out of scope. actually integration happened after coalition achieved it success in changing corp leaders thinking. reject
E no its other way around. those incentives made it feasible for corp to transition into renewable energy. reject.
joydipb01
When Dr. Rachel Thompson assumed the leadership of the Health Awareness Coalition, she began a ten-year battle to promote the use of renewable energy sources among major corporations in the United States. In 2021, the Coalition achieved a significant victory when several large corporations publicly committed to transitioning to renewable energy sources by 2030. Dr. Thompson's efforts helped transform the attitude of corporate leaders towards sustainability and their role in environmental stewardship. Eventually, her work helped to weaken the resistance among industry giants to adopting green energy solutions.
In her campaign, Dr. Thompson faced formidable obstacles. The first was corporate leaders' understandable skepticism toward renewable energy, which had historically been perceived as cost-inefficient. An additional obstacle was the lobbying power of the fossil fuel industry, which weakened support among corporations for an independent transition to green energy.
The Coalition possessed a number of advantages, however, including Dr. Thompson's own strategic abilities. In 2016, she took the bold step of organizing a nationwide campaign to educate the public about the benefits of renewable energy. Such a campaign, on a national scale, under effective leadership, helped replace the stereotype of renewable energy as an impractical choice with the image of it as a viable and necessary solution. In addition, the Coalition's widespread network of supporters aided its efforts. Supporters were spread throughout the country, communicating through social media and local events; their grassroots efforts protected the Coalition's internal communications from being intercepted by opponents. That the Coalition had a clear and unified mission of promoting renewable energy among major corporations strengthened its resolve and encouraged a sense of collective identity and solidarity. But it was only in the late 2010s that federal incentives and subsidies for renewable energy made it financially feasible for corporations to commit to the transition.
Not content with this triumph, Dr. Thompson integrated the Coalition into the International Renewable Energy Alliance, where it became an equal partner among the organization's 50 other member groups. She reasoned that as a member group, the Coalition would be in a better position to exert pressure on member corporations that were slow to adopt green energy practices. Such practices were eventually mandated by international agreements in 2022.
1. According to the passage, by 2021 the skepticism of corporate leaders toward renewable energy was
(A) unchanged except among corporations in the technology sector
(B) reinforced by the lobbying efforts of the fossil fuel industry
(C) mitigated by the efforts of Dr. Thompson
(D) weakened by the immediate financial benefits of federal incentives
(E) largely alleviated because of the policies of the International Renewable Energy Alliance
2. In using the word "understandable", the author most clearly conveys
(A) sympathy with attempts by the Coalition between 2011 and 2021 to promote renewable energy
(B) concern that the obstacles faced by Dr. Thompson between 2011 and 2021 were indeed formidable
(C) ambivalence about the significance of renewable energy to most corporations in the 2010s
(D) appreciation of the attitude of many corporate leaders in the 2010s toward renewable energy
(E) regret at the historical attitude of corporations toward renewable energy
3. The passage suggests that in the 2010s a company in the United States was able to
(A) use its own funds to set up a lobbying group against renewable energy
(B) require its employees to support the company's stance on energy policies
(C) develop a unified energy policy for all its subsidiaries with little opposition
(D) pressure its employees to promote fossil fuels over renewable energy
(E) use its resources to prevent the passage of federal incentives for renewable energy
4. The passage supplies information concerning which of the following matters related to Dr. Thompson?
(A) The steps she took to initiate the founding of the Coalition
(B) Her motivation for integrating the Coalition into the International Renewable Energy Alliance
(C) The influence she had on the passage of international agreements mandating green energy practices in 2022
(D) The influence she had on the passage of federal incentives for renewable energy in the late 2010s
(E) The success she and the Coalition had in influencing the energy policies of other member groups in the International Renewable Energy Alliance
5. The passage suggests which of the following about the response of major corporations to the Coalition's push for renewable energy before the late 2010s?
(A) Most major corporations were initially enthusiastic about transitioning to renewable energy but faced logistical challenges.
(B) Major corporations were generally resistant to transitioning to renewable energy due to perceived cost inefficiencies.
(C) Many major corporations committed to renewable energy before the Coalition achieved its first significant victory in 2021.
(D) The response of major corporations was most positive after the Coalition joined the International Renewable Energy Alliance.
(E) Major corporations were unaffected by the federal incentives and subsidies for renewable energy.