Last visit was: 08 May 2026, 05:30 It is currently 08 May 2026, 05:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,906
 [15]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,906
 [15]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
deabas
Joined: 18 Feb 2016
Last visit: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
63
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 86
Kudos: 63
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sudhirmadaan
Joined: 29 Nov 2011
Last visit: 22 Jul 2016
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 366
Posts: 75
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,906
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,906
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sudhirmadaan
Two events not are in sync and Clear time frame is given so simple past tense, directing to D and E
E is not parallel. SO D is the answer.
One more thing to which I am not 100% sure about E. E does not have verb for 'he", but not sure if "Although structure" permits noun and noun phrase.
Please confirm.
Dear sudhirmadaan,
I'm happy to respond. :-) I am not sure what you mean when you say that "(E) does not have a verb for 'he'." The word "considered" is a fully-fledged past tense verb. The subordinate conjunction "although," like any other, always requires a full [noun] + [verb] structure.
Mike :-)
User avatar
Mahmud6
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 01 Apr 2026
Posts: 381
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 235
Status:The best is yet to come.....
Posts: 381
Kudos: 901
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear friend, mikemcgarry
mikemcgarry
The subordinate conjunction "although," like any other, always requires a full [noun] + [verb] structure.
Mike :-)
Does subordinate conjunction always require [noun] + [verb][/b] structure? Somehow I came to know that subordinating conjunction can be followed by a noun or a sentence, depending on the meaning. I may be wrong, but to be confirmed I am citing few sentences below:

After lunch, I felt sleepy.
After I worked twelve hours, I felt tired.
I worked until midnight.
I worked until I felt tired.

I would be happy, if you assist me in removing my confusion.
Thanks in advance.
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 812
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 812
Kudos: 617
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imo D
Only D makes sense
Had in A is wrong and there is redundancy in A ( who is used multiple times).
Had been considering is wrong in B
C has a fragment and use of ing modifier is wrong .
E distorts meaning by using Jewish canvasser Bloom’s story the story was about him and he did not write it .
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,906
 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,906
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mahmud6
Dear friend, mikemcgarry
mikemcgarry
The subordinate conjunction "although," like any other, always requires a full [noun] + [verb] structure.
Mike :-)
Does subordinate conjunction always require [noun] + [verb] structure? Somehow I came to know that subordinating conjunction can be followed by a noun or a sentence, depending on the meaning. I may be wrong, but to be confirmed I am citing few sentences below:

After lunch, I felt sleepy.
After I worked twelve hours, I felt tired.
I worked until midnight.
I worked until I felt tired.

I would be happy, if you assist me in removing my confusion.
Thanks in advance.
Dear Mahmud6,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, here's the maddening thing about the English language. The words "although" and "after" and "until" each have two roles: as a subordinate conjunction and as an ordinary preposition. As a preposition, any of these can be followed simply by a noun. As a subordinate conjunction, each one demands a full [noun] + [verb] structure.

As a general rule, there's no confusion between these two usages. Following "after" by a fixed noun is very different from following "after" with a full action.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
avatar
Sateni7628
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Last visit: 23 Aug 2020
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 44
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
James Joyce wrote the novel Ulysses through the teens and published it in 1922, although in 1906, when he was finishing the short story collection Dubliners, he had considered the addition of another story about the canvasser Bloom, who was Jewish and who later was the title Ulysses character.

(A) he had considered the addition of another story about the canvasser Bloom, who was Jewish and who later was the title Ulysses character.

(B) he had been considering that he add an additional extra story, the Jewish canvasser Bloom, and to later make him the Ulysses' title character.

(C) considering the inclusion of the story of Bloom, the Jewish canvasser who would become the Ulysses title character later

(D) he considered including another story about the Jewish canvasser Bloom, who later would be the title character of the Ulysses

(E) he considered adding the Jewish canvasser Bloom’s story, and Bloom later would have become the Ulysses title character



All other choices except D distort the original meaning. Hence choice D is the right answer.
User avatar
h31337u
Joined: 26 Jul 2014
Last visit: 10 May 2023
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 84
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
James Joyce wrote the novel Ulysses through the teens and published it in 1922, although in 1906, when he was finishing the short story collection Dubliners, he had considered the addition of another story about the canvasser Bloom, who was Jewish and who later was the title Ulysses character.

(A) he had considered the addition of another story about the canvasser Bloom, who was Jewish and who later was the title Ulysses character.
--> wrong. had.pp is not necessary and does not go along with the subordinate clause "was finishing"'s tense.

(B) he had been considering that he add an additional extra story, the Jewish canvasser Bloom, and to later make him the Ulysses' title character.
--> wrong. had.pp is not necessary and does not go along with the subordinate clause "was finishing"'s tense.
--> additional and extra have the same meaning. redundant.

(C) considering the inclusion of the story of Bloom, the Jewish canvasser who would become the Ulysses title character later
--> wrong. no subject or a verb, hence a sentence is fragmented.

(D) he considered including another story about the Jewish canvasser Bloom, who later would be the title character of the Ulysses
--> correct.

(E) he considered adding the Jewish canvasser Bloom’s story, and Bloom later would have become the Ulysses title character
--> wrong. here "would have become" suggests Bloom did not become Ulysses.
User avatar
minalgambhir
Joined: 15 Aug 2020
Last visit: 08 Jun 2024
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 133
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ERROR ANALYSIS -

1) Since time period '1906' is given, simple past should be used

ANSWER CHOICE ANALYSIS -

A) Since time period '1906' is given, simple past should be used
B) Since time period '1906' is given, simple past should be used
C) Since time period '1906' is given, simple past should be used
D) CORRECT
E) Bloom used repititively
User avatar
jppresa
Joined: 26 Dec 2020
Last visit: 13 Aug 2025
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Location: Spain
Schools: LSE MFin "23
GPA: 3.8
Schools: LSE MFin "23
Posts: 38
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(D) he considered including another story about the Jewish canvasser Bloom, who later would be the title character of the Ulysses

Doesn't this sentence allow meaning issues? Is it another story about the Jewish canvasser (meaning there are already more stories about this theme)? Or is it adding one more story about this particular theme to the other unrelated stories?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,434
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,434
Kudos: 1,011
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
541 posts
363 posts