Last visit was: 02 May 2026, 21:24 It is currently 02 May 2026, 21:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
5,239
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 5,239
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,899
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
matthewsmith_89
Joined: 06 Dec 2016
Last visit: 06 Oct 2017
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 177
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 5,239
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi mikemcgarry,

The source of the above question is GMAT FREE.

Here is the OE:
Quote:

Creating a filter: the sentence as written has an error at "try and set," which is not an allowed phrase in precise English. It's one action, not two, and the action is "try to set."

Applying the filter: our filter points us to (D) and (E). Choice (D) uses the gerund "being paid" without need. Choice (E) has passive voice but looks good. We check (C) - is there definitely an objective defect in (C)? Yes: "restrictions for" is not the English idiom; it's "restrictions on." The correct answer is (E).

Note: there is a difference between "try setting" and "try to set." In the first case, we know that we'll be able to do the setting, we're "trying" it to see what the result will be. In the second case, we don't know whether we will be able to set in the first place, but we are attempting to do so.

This may be a poor quality question, but I want to ask whether 'restrictions for the amount' is a valid idiom? Even I eliminated C thinking that the option has an idiom error.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,899
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,899
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
Hi mikemcgarry,

The source of the above question is GMAT FREE.

Here is the OE:
Quote:

Creating a filter: the sentence as written has an error at "try and set," which is not an allowed phrase in precise English. It's one action, not two, and the action is "try to set."

Applying the filter: our filter points us to (D) and (E). Choice (D) uses the gerund "being paid" without need. Choice (E) has passive voice but looks good. We check (C) - is there definitely an objective defect in (C)? Yes: "restrictions for" is not the English idiom; it's "restrictions on." The correct answer is (E).

Note: there is a difference between "try setting" and "try to set." In the first case, we know that we'll be able to do the setting, we're "trying" it to see what the result will be. In the second case, we don't know whether we will be able to set in the first place, but we are attempting to do so.

This may be a poor quality question, but I want to ask whether 'restrictions for the amount' is a valid idiom? Even I eliminated C thinking that the option has an idiom error.
Dear Vyshak,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Here's what I'll say. Some idioms have a black/white quality--one phrasing is 100% right and another is 100% wrong. For example,
... able to understand .... = 100% right
... able for understanding .... = 100% wrong
There's no ambiguity in that case. In this case, "restrictions on" is 100% correct and formal, but "restrictions for" is more in a grey area, not ideal, not the best, probably not something that would be correct on the GMAT, but not jarringly wrong the way that the above example is. I also see now that (C) changes the meaning slightly, from "have to pay" to "allowed to pay." So (C) has problems. It's just that (E) is an awkward disaster. There is nothing satisfying about the question, the way an official question is deeply intellectually satisfying.

Here are some free GMAT idiom flashcards.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,431
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,431
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
520 posts
363 posts