OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
Like Freud, much of Jung’s evidence comes from dreams or undirected fantasy.
•
like is a preposition that means
similar to — and GMAC prefers
like to
similar to• use
like to compare nouns and noun phrases
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A)
Like Freud, much of
Jung’s evidence• Compares Freud (the person) to Jung's evidence (a thing)
• Rearrange words if you cannot figure out what is being compared:
Illogical:
Much of Jung's evidence is like Freud.Freud was odd (and if you ask me, a misogynist)—but he was definitely not Jung's
evidence.
Quote:
B) Much of Jung’s evidence, like Freud’s,
• I see no errors
→ makes a comparison between
Jung's evidence and
Freud's [evidence]→ As a quantifier,
much always quantifies uncountable nouns and is singular
Correct: Much of Jung's evidence comes from dreams.
Correct: Much of Freud's evidence comes from dreams.
→ In option B, we are simply splicing those two sentences together.
KEEP
Quote:
C) Much of
Jung’s evidence, like Freud,
• This option has the same problem as that in option A. Namely, it
• Compares Jung's evidence to Freud
Take the word after
like and rearrange the sentence:
Illogical comparison:
Freud is like Jung's evidence.Freud did not come from dreams.
At least not mine. (Or those of anyone.) (Yes, I have studied this man's work far too often.)
ELIMINATE C
Quote:
D) Much of Jung and Freud’s evidence
• This sentence is a much harder call than people are noticing, probably because people do not know the plurality rule below
• When two or more nouns possess the same thing, we add an apostrophe to only the final name in the series, and that one possessive noun indicates possession by all
→ Correct:
I went to Abby and Miriam's graduation.
If two or more nouns do not possess the same thing, we use an apostrophe with each noun.
→ Correct:
Kathy's and Tom's houses are about a block apart.Non-count nouns such as
evidence, because they are not pluralized, do not tell us whether we are talking about different things.
In this case, we
are talking about different things.
Jung's evidence was similar but not identical to Freud's evidence.
Option D should state:
Much of Jung's and Freud's evidenceELIMINATE D
Quote:
E) As with the evidence of Freud, much of Jung’s evidence
• GMAT does not like
as with in place of
like• generally,
as should be followed by a clause
• meaning is ambiguous and the sentence is clumsy
→ "evidence of Freud" could mean "proof that Freud existed" or "evidence that Freud used."
→ Compare to option B. No contest. Option B is clearer.
ELIMINATE E
The best answer is B.COMMENTSI will post the other OE in a few hours.
atulpatil and
Ksher , welcome to SC Butler.
Today, as long as you
explained your answer, you get a smiley face.
No one explained the correct reason for eliminating D.
Be safe.