Last visit was: 30 Apr 2026, 12:26 It is currently 30 Apr 2026, 12:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
niraj92
Joined: 27 Sep 2010
Last visit: 15 Jan 2011
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
31
 [6]
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 13
Kudos: 31
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Ellipse
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 07 Jul 2013
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 64
Kudos: 194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BKimball
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Last visit: 16 Sep 2013
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
870
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools:MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Posts: 167
Kudos: 870
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Werewolf
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Last visit: 08 Aug 2021
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Posts: 61
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BKimball
Great work to everybody on this one. The fundamental rule has two-parts:

1. If you say "not only" you are required to also say "but also." You can never have the construction "not only...also" or "not...but also" or anything else of the sort. "Not only" and "but also" are bff, and you can't have one without the other.

2. What follows "not only" must be structurally and logically similar to what follows "but also." For example:

"I bought not only bread, but also milk." --> Right! Bread and milk are both foods and both nouns.
"I bought not only bread, but also considered buying milk." --> Wrong! "Bread" is a noun, but "considered buying milk" is a more complex clause.

Isn't parallelism fun?

Brett

Thanks for a great explanation. It's always comforting when one sees answers confirmed by experts. There are instances when two different people have different OAs.

I'm not too sure but I think I remember that Tommy Wallach (one of Manhattan Instructors) once said that there are constructions that don't always follow the '...not only...but also...' rule.
User avatar
BKimball
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Last visit: 16 Sep 2013
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
870
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools:MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Posts: 167
Kudos: 870
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Werewolf,

Grammatically, it is possible (though HIGHLY suspect) to have a "not only...but" structure. However, the GMAT loves to test your understanding of why "not only...but also" is necessary for purposes of parallelism.

As with "numbers" (i.e. "My favorite numbers are six and twelve."), and "being" (i.e. "My uncle Charlie is a human being.") there are times when you can use "not only...but." Still, they VERY rarely include GMAT questions, so it's pretty safe to forget about them for our purposes.

Brett
User avatar
puneetpratik
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Last visit: 30 Mar 2013
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 32
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
niraj92
No only smoking cigarettes but also cigar smoking has been banned now from many places.
(A) No only smoking cigarettes but also cigar smoking has been banned now
(B) Cigarette smoking and cigar smoking are both banned now
(C) Not only has smoking cigarettes been banned but so has cigar smoking
(D) Both smoking cigarettes and cigar smoking is now banned
(E) Smoking cigarettes as well as cigars is now banned


In E, I took "Smoking" as a gerund thus is is in SV with "is" and thus I chose E as it is concise. In B "Cigarette smoking and cigar smoking" is wordy. Also the placement of NOW seems correct in E.
User avatar
BKimball
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Last visit: 16 Sep 2013
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
870
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools:MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Posts: 167
Kudos: 870
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You are right that (E) is more concise. However, we need to remember that concision is ONLY a tie-breaker on SC.

Far more important than concision is GRAMMAR. If an answer is grammatically incorrect, it must be crossed off.

Once you've dealt with all the grammatical issues, you can then look at the MEANING of the sentence. If the meaning is changed in an answer choice, then that answer is incorrect.

Only after you've dealt with GRAMMAR and MEANING should you consider CONCISION. Concision is very much a tiebreaker on the GMAT, and in my experience the shortest answer tends to be incorrect because it leaves out something important. Remember that the GMAT writers know people are looking for concise answers, so concise answers are a great place for a trap.
User avatar
prashantbacchewar
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Last visit: 28 Mar 2014
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Concentration: Finacee, General Management
Schools:ISB, HEC, Said
Posts: 150
Kudos: 321
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In this problem answer choice A is not correct only because it is in passive voice is that correct. Otherwise there is no gramatical mistake?
User avatar
BKimball
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Last visit: 16 Sep 2013
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
870
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools:MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Posts: 167
Kudos: 870
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question! The answer has two parts:

1. General: No SC answer choice will ever be wrong simply on the basis of passive vs. active verbs. Although we tend to prefer the active voice (many of your future Business school professors will point this out regularly), there is no rule that says "passive voice is wrong."

2. Specific to this question: "No only smoking cigarettes but also cigar smoking has been banned now..." Although you are correct that this is passive voice ("has been banned"), the reason this answer choice is wrong really relates to parallelism. First, you have the "not only...but also" issue. When you have "but also" you really should have "not only" also. Here, you have "no only." This might be a typo on the part of the original poster. Second, and perhaps even more grammatically sound: The two things that follow each of these signal phrases should be parallel. "Smoking cigarettes" and "cigar smoking" are not parallel; the first phrase starts with the verb "smoking" and the second starts with the noun "cigar."

Does that all make sense?

Brett
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,088
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Not only smoking cigarettes but also cigar smoking has been banned now (the parallelism marker has to put two same elements in parallel, here smoking cigarettes should be parallel to smoking cigar which is not the case) (INCORRECT)

(B) Cigarette smoking and cigar smoking are both banned now (the parallelism is between two similar type of elements) (CORRECT)

(C) Not only has smoking cigarettes been banned but (also is missing) so has cigar smoking (parallelism marker is incomplete)

(D) Both smoking cigarettes and cigar smoking is now banned (same mistake as A, smoking cigarettes should be parallel to smoking cigar which is not the case) (INCORRECT)

(E) Smoking cigarettes as well as smoking is missing cigars is now banned (smoking cigar as well as smoking cigarettes is ban, word ambiguity) (INCORRECT)

Answer is B
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,427
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,427
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
512 posts
363 posts