Quote:
Historians of film
have traced the first appearance of the “pie in the face” gag to a 1913 short called A Noise From The Deep; famed comedian Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle is credited with bringing the routine to the screen.
Quote:
A. have traced the first appearance of the “pie in the face” gag to a 1913 short called A Noise From The Deep
Historians have traced the first appearance of xyz to a 1913 short called abc; @#$ is credited with something. This seems pretty good. Conveys the logical meaning. Two
related independent claused are separated by a semi colon. No error.
Correct.
Quote:
B. have traced to a short called A Noise From The Deep in 1913 the first appearance of the “pie in the face” gag
Misplaced modifier error.
Placement of to a short called abc should be placed after
the first appearance of xyz. You trace X to Y. You do not trace to Y X. This construction is wrong. Unidiomatic.
Incorrect.
Quote:
C. has traced the first appearance of the “pie in the face” gag to A Noise From The Deep, a short from 1913
We have a
Plural noun
Historians, the usage of "
has" makes it wrong.
Incorrect.
Quote:
D. has traced the “pie in the face” gag’s first appearance to a short in 1913, A Noise From The Deep
Same error as above.
Incorrect.
Quote:
E. have traced the “pie in the face” gag to its first appearance in a 1913 short, A Noise From The Deep
Whenever I see an "its" it's a call to check for pronoun ambiguity, and one of the easiest methods, as prescribed by
GMATNinja is to place the noun "its" is seemingly trying to refer to in the place of "its" and check if the sentence still makes sense.
Historians of film have traced the “pie in the face” gag to
"pie in the face's" first appearance in a 1913 short xyz... This is illogical. They have traced the X to X's first appearance. This neither makes sense nor is the intended meaning.
Incorrect.
Notes:
1. Usage of Semi-colons: (source: niu.edu)
You can use a semicolon to 1) join two
related independent clauses in place of a comma and a coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, nor, for, so, yet). 2) Semicolons should not be used between a dependent clause and an independent clause.
Correct: Donald finished all his work, but Hillary did not finish hers.
Correct: Donald finished all his homework; Hillary did not finish hers.
Incorrect: Although Joe is a kind student; that new guy is not.
Correct: Although Joe is a kind student, that new guy is not.
2.
Usage of Word Credit: (Source: SC notes gmatclub): Although GMAT won't check on the basis of this question alone.
The word ‘
credit’ can be used as a
noun and a
verb (mostly).
Credit with/ Credit to -
Credit with or
Credit to is used when we credit someone with accomplishments. In most of the sentences I have seen, it is used as 'verb'. In my opinion
Credit with is more commonly used between the two. But still, both are correct. The overall sentence would help you ascertain the correct answer choice. This is a good example of it:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/nina-simone-whose-distinctive-technique-is-credited-as-to-her-early-349457.html#p2730343Credit for -
Credit for is used when 'credit' is not used as a verb instead of a noun.
For example:
1. Newton is
credited with the discovery of gravity.
AS VERB.2. Newton has been given
credit for the discovery of gravity.
AS NOUN.One
gives credit to someone for something. In this sentence,
‘credit’ is used as a noun, as it is the
object of the verb ‘gives’.3. Sam
gave all the
credit for the arrangements to Melissa. (in this sentence, ‘credit’ means praise for or acknowledgment of an action).