Last visit was: 30 Apr 2026, 05:47 It is currently 30 Apr 2026, 05:47
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,258
Own Kudos:
37,740
 [3]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,258
Kudos: 37,740
 [3]
Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction 26 Apr 2022, 23:17
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

76% (01:32) correct 24% (01:39) wrong based on 70 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet

Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction, apple growers have decreased their use of certain pesticides that were identified by the FDA as potentially carcinogenic or otherwise toxic to humans.


A) Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction, apple growers have decreased the use of certain pesticides that were identified by the FDA

B) Apple growers have decreased the use of certain pesticides that once were believed to be essential in the prevention of crop destruction, and they were identified by the FDA

C) Apple growers have decreased the use of certain pesticides once believed to be essential in the prevention of crop destruction because the FDA has identified them

D) Essential, it was once believed, in preventing crop destruction, apple growers have decreased their use of certain pesticides identified by the FDA

E) Essential, it was once believed, in the prevention of crop destruction, the use of certain pesticides has been decreased by apple growers that have been identified by the FDA
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,258
Own Kudos:
37,740
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,258
Kudos: 37,740
 [1]
Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction 26 Apr 2022, 23:21
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For forum member aspirants and non-experts:
All correct answers that contain good explanations will be awarded ONE KUDOS.

Exceptional answers may be "bumped" to Best Community Reply.

Kudos will be awarded after the OE is posted.
User avatar
kungfury42
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2022
Last visit: 31 May 2023
Posts: 580
Own Kudos:
519
 [1]
Given Kudos: 724
Schools: NUS '25 (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: NUS '25 (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 580
Kudos: 519
 [1]
Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction 26 Apr 2022, 23:27
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it should be C.

(A) Once believed to be essential in preventing crop destruction incorrectly modifies apple growers.

(B) Identified by the FDA as potentially carcinogenic incorrectly modifies apple growers.

(C) Correct!!

(D) Same error as in A.

(E) Same error as in B.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
winterschool
User avatar
Verbal Chat Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,890
Own Kudos:
1,665
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,681
Posts: 1,890
Kudos: 1,665
 [1]
Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction 27 Apr 2022, 00:33
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction, apple growers have decreased their use of certain pesticides that were identified by the FDA as potentially carcinogenic or otherwise toxic to humans.


A) Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction, apple growers have decreased the use of certain pesticides that were identified by the FDA Incorrect

apple growers is modifies by previous modifier that doesnt make sense

B) Apple growers have decreased the use of certain pesticides that once were believed to be essential in the prevention of crop destruction, and they were identified by the FDA Incorrect

in second part of the sentence, they has no clear reference and also in passive form

C) Apple growers have decreased the use of certain pesticides once believed to be essential in the prevention of crop destruction because the FDA has identified them Correct

C is short and better than B

D) Essential, it was once believed, in preventing crop destruction, apple growers have decreased their use of certain pesticides identified by the FDA Incorrect

same as A

E) Essential, it was once believed, in the prevention of crop destruction, the use of certain pesticides has been decreased by apple growers that have been identified by the FDA Incorrect

same as A
User avatar
zhanbo
User avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Last visit: 07 Jul 2024
Posts: 1,464
Own Kudos:
2,480
 [2]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,464
Kudos: 2,480
 [2]
Believed once to be essential in preventing crop destruction 27 Apr 2022, 00:43
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer is (C). It took me 03:33. I had to run five options twice, and then weighed between (C) and (E).

First pass
(A) It is nonsensical / comical to claim that "apple growers" were "(b)elieved once to be essential in preventing crop destruction".

(B) "they" in "they were identified" naturally refers to "Apple growers", but readers then realize "they" refers to "certain pesticides". So "they" does not have a clear antecedent, to say the least.
The use of "and" does not convey the cause-and-effect relationship between two clauses clearly.
Also, the use of a noun (prevention) is not as active / concise as the use of a verb ("prevent"), as (A) does.

(C) "them" can refer to "Apple growers" or "certain pesticides". Such ambiguity cannot be easily disambiguated as readers are likely to believe that "them" refers to "Apple growers".
Also, the use of a noun (prevention) is not as active / concise as the use of a verb ("prevent"), as (A) does.

(D) How to account for "it was once believed"? It sounds ok. I just treated it as a nonessential parenthesis.
It is wrong to suggest that "apple growers" are "essential in preventing crop destruction”

(E) In the first pass, I eliminated (E) mainly because it seems that the antecedent for "that" in "that have been identified" is "apple growers". More analysis below.

So I eliminated all five options! Have to loosen the standard and review them a second time.

Second pass
I had to go through all five options again because I had no paper trail of the though process in the first pass.
I narrowed the field down to between (C) and (E).

Option (C)
The ambiguity of the antecedent for "them" is disturbing but may not be fatal.
The use of "prevention" instead of "prevent" is a minor issue.
The relationship denotated by "because" is logical and effective.
The use of active voice throughout the sentence ("decreased the use" and "identified them") is a plus.

Option (E)
"apple growers" are people, so "that" in "that have been identified" cannot actually refer to "apple growers". It is actually possible that "that" refers to "certain pesticides" then.
Still, the distance between "certain pesticides" and "that" makes such connection rather tenuous.
Can we say "the use of certain pesticide", rather than "certain pesticide", was once believed to be "essential in the prevention of crop destruction"? I think it is ok.
Note the use of of "prevention" instead of "prevent". No advantage here over (C).
The consistent use of passive voice ("been decreased" and "been identified") is not as effective as active voice in (C).
The relationship between "been decreased" and "been identified" is not explicitly revealed.

Ultimately, I found that (E) contains more issues to be an effective sentence. (C) is not without issues (and does cause misreading) but is still a better sentence.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
512 posts
bhanu29
363 posts