Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 09:40 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 09:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,133
Own Kudos:
7,377
 [17]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,133
Kudos: 7,377
 [17]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,481
Own Kudos:
5,779
 [2]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,481
Kudos: 5,779
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Paras96
Joined: 11 Sep 2022
Last visit: 30 Dec 2023
Posts: 456
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Paras: Bhawsar
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V24
GMAT 2: 580 Q49 V21
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.2
WE:Project Management (Other)
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 456
Kudos: 337
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The logical error in the passage is a form of invalid inference known as an affirming the consequent fallacy. It incorrectly assumes that if someone is a great artist, they could excel at creating false marble, even though the passage itself acknowledges that Picasso did not have a light hand.

(A) The police have determined that the murderer left his fingerprints on the knife. Ira’s fingerprints do not match those on the knife, so we can eliminate him as a suspect.

The logical error here is not directly related to the passage's error. In this option, the error is assuming that the absence of matching fingerprints means Ira cannot be the murderer. This is a hasty generalization, as there could be reasons for Ira's fingerprints not matching even if he were the murderer (wearing gloves, for example).

(B) It is true that it is necessary to work hard in order to succeed. However, Smith was governor of the state, so it was possible for him to succeed without working hard.

This option contains a logical error similar to the passage's error. It incorrectly infers that because Smith succeeded, he could have done so without working hard, despite acknowledging the necessity of hard work for success.


(C) Whenever I eat nuts of any kind I break out in hives. After eating the pie I did not break out, so I know it could not have been real pecan pie.

The logical error here is a different type called affirming the consequent. The argument incorrectly concludes that the absence of an allergic reaction means the pie couldn't have been real pecan pie, even though other factors could explain the lack of reaction (e.g., the pie not containing pecans).

(D) If the inventory can be sold within the next few months, the business can be saved. However, since a sale cannot be concluded quickly, the business will go under.

The logical error here is not directly related to the passage's error. This is an argument based on a conditional statement, and it concludes that the business will go under because a sale cannot be concluded quickly. However, it overlooks potential alternative solutions or factors that could save the business in the long run.

(E) Only the brave deserve the spoils. Major Wilson has distinguished himself several times for bravery, so surely he deserves the spoils.

This option contains a logical error similar to the passage's error. It incorrectly infers that because Major Wilson is brave, he must deserve the spoils, even though the premise is based on a general statement that might not apply in every case.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,432
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,432
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
505 posts
361 posts