Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 08:43 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 08:43
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
avatar
akashbolster
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2014
Last visit: 08 Feb 2018
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
42
 [13]
Given Kudos: 83
Schools: ISB '17 NUS '17
Schools: ISB '17 NUS '17
Posts: 22
Kudos: 42
 [13]
Dr. Bronstein, the noted oncological researcher, cites contradictory 17 Oct 2017, 11:43
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

65% (02:22) correct 35% (02:29) wrong based on 642 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Dr. Bronstein, the noted oncological researcher, cites contradictory evidence in his article comparing smoking and environmental factors as cancer-causing agents in humans. He attributes the increase in cancer-related mortality “largely to lung cancer,” which he further notes, “is itself largely due to smoking.” In a similar vein, he makes reference to methodologically sound studies which pinpoint smoking as the actor which causes the greatest number of cancer deaths. Yet, he then goes on record as stating that he agrees with estimates that approximately 80 percent of human cancers are caused by environmental factors and not by smoking.

Which one of the following would most contribute to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy described above?

a) The sources which Dr. Bronstein cited for the statistics linking 80 percent of human cancers to environmental factors cited smoking as the next largest cause of human cancers.

b) Dr. Bronstein fails to make the assumption that a given cancer could not be attributable to more than a single cause.

c) Many of the cancers caused by environmental factors do not result in death.

d) It is possible for the results of even the most methodologically sound of studies to be proven wrong at a later date.

e) Dr. Bronstein fails to consider that many of the individuals whose cancers were environmentally caused may have also been smokers.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
avatar
Yashita
avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Last visit: 24 Nov 2017
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
5
 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
Location: India
Schools: Insead Sept'18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.9
Schools: Insead Sept'18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 10
Kudos: 5
 [2]
Dr. Bronstein, the noted oncological researcher, cites contradictory 30 Oct 2017, 09:06
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Dr. Bronstein, the noted oncological researcher, cites contradictory evidence in his article comparing smoking and environmental factors as cancer-causing agents in humans. He attributes the increase in cancer-related mortality “largely to lung cancer,” which he further notes, “is itself largely due to smoking.” In a similar vein, he makes reference to methodologically sound studies which pinpoint smoking as the actor which causes the greatest number of cancer deaths. Yet, he then goes on record as stating that he agrees with estimates that approximately 80 percent of human cancers are caused by environmental factors and not by smoking.

Which one of the following would most contribute to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy described above?

a) The sources which Dr. Bronstein cited for the statistics linking 80 percent of human cancers to environmental factors cited smoking as the next largest cause of human cancers.

b) Dr. Bronstein fails to make the assumption that a given cancer could not be attributable to more than a single cause.

c) Many of the cancers caused by environmental factors do not result in death.

d) It is possible for the results of even the most methodologically sound of studies to be proven wrong at a later date.

e) Dr. Bronstein fails to consider that many of the individuals whose cancers were environmentally caused may have also been smokers.
Show more

What's the OA? My answer is C
User avatar
Krishnagupta02
User avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Last visit: 25 Dec 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Dr. Bronstein, the noted oncological researcher, cites contradictory 19 Jun 2024, 22:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi can anyone explain why the correct answer is C
User avatar
Arkham777
User avatar
Joined: 30 Dec 2022
Last visit: 15 Sep 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 6
Kudos: 7
 [1]
Dr. Bronstein, the noted oncological researcher, cites contradictory 19 Jun 2024, 23:18
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is "c" because if you read carefully you will realise that he never said smoking causes alot of cancer but cancer-related deaths so c resolves this

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
A_Nishith
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 452
Own Kudos:
203
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 452
Kudos: 203
Dr. Bronstein, the noted oncological researcher, cites contradictory 21 Jul 2024, 21:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The apparent discrepancy in Dr. Bronstein's statements revolves around two points:

He attributes an increase in cancer-related mortality largely to lung cancer, which is largely due to smoking.
He agrees with estimates that approximately 80 percent of human cancers are caused by environmental factors, not by smoking.
To reconcile these points, we need to consider how these two statements can coexist without contradiction.

Explanation of Options:

a) The sources which Dr. Bronstein cited for the statistics linking 80 percent of human cancers to environmental factors cited smoking as the next largest cause of human cancers.

This option does not directly address the discrepancy. It merely adds information about the relative importance of smoking compared to other environmental factors.

b) Dr. Bronstein fails to make the assumption that a given cancer could not be attributable to more than a single cause.

This option suggests that cancers could have multiple causes, but it doesn't directly explain how the 80 percent figure and the role of smoking can be reconciled.

c) Many of the cancers caused by environmental factors do not result in death.

This option does not address the core issue, which is the attribution of cancer causation rather than the outcome (death) of those cancers.

d) It is possible for the results of even the most methodologically sound of studies to be proven wrong at a later date.

This option introduces the possibility of error in studies but does not explain the specific discrepancy in Dr. Bronstein's statements.

e) Dr. Bronstein fails to consider that many of the individuals whose cancers were environmentally caused may have also been smokers.

This option directly addresses the discrepancy. It suggests that environmental factors and smoking are not mutually exclusive. Many individuals could have cancers caused by a combination of environmental factors and smoking. Thus, smoking can be a significant contributor to lung cancer mortality while still fitting within the broader context of environmental factors causing a large percentage of cancers.

Therefore, the option that most contributes to explaining the apparent discrepancy is: (e)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
1,009
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Dr. Bronstein, the noted oncological researcher, cites contradictory 07 Feb 2026, 19:39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
501 posts
bhanu29
358 posts