All laundry detergents contain surfactants, which can harm aquatic life. However, the environmental effects of most ingredients in laundry detergents, including most of those in so-called "ecologically friendly" detergents, are unknown. Therefore, there is no reason to suppose that laundry detergents advertised as ecologically friendly are less damaging to the environment than other laundry detergents are.
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
(A) Laundry detergents that are advertised as ecologically friendly contain much lower amounts of surfactants, on average, than do other laundry detergents. - CORRECT. We have a reason to believe that ecologically friendly ones are less damaging to environment.
(B) There is no reason to suppose that most of the ingredients in laundry detergents not advertised as ecologically friendly
harm the environment significantly. - WRONG. Harming whether significantly or not is not the question. Irrelevant.
(C) Different kinds of laundry detergents contain different kinds of surfactants, which
differ in the degree to which they could potentially harm aquatic life. - WRONG. Again an open scenario is presented. So, nothing is certain.
(D) There is reason to suppose that
ingredients in laundry detergents other than surfactants harm the environment more than surfactants do. - WRONG. Irrelevant. The effects are not known as said in passage.
(E) Laundry detergents advertised as environmentally friendly are typically less effective than other detergents, so that
larger amounts must be used. - WRONG. Even if large amounts is used, we are left with a question as in how much is that amount. It remains a open possibility wherein amount is smaller than non-ecologically friendly detergents or larger.
Answer A.