Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
42%
(01:56)
correct 58%
(01:53)
wrong
based on 357
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Avoidance of purchasing food products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has become a growing trend among many consumers who believe that HFCS is less healthy than plain sugar, because of the percentage of sugars in HFCS. Nevertheless, a recent experiment found that there was virtually no difference in glucose values among people who consumed equal amounts of either sugar or HFCS. Glucose values represent the levels of sugar in the blood.
If the statements above are all accurate, they most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
(A) HFCS' nutritional value of sugars is very similar to that of plain sugar.
(B) Reducing the consumption of HFCS will not result in lower glucose values.
(C) Glucose values cannot be regarded as the only indicator of healthy nutrition.
(D) Glucose values remains steady no matter which diet people try.
(E) Items from HFCS and plain sugar should both be considered unhealthy ingredients
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Avoidance of purchasing food products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has become a growing trend among many consumers who believe that HFCS is less healthy than plain sugar, because of the percentage of sugars in HFCS. Nevertheless, a recent experiment found that there was virtually no difference in glucose values among people who consumed equal amounts of either sugar or HFCS. Glucose values represent the levels of sugar in the blood.
If the statements above are all accurate, they most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
Blue = sub conclusion/ counter premise. Green = a premise that supports our conclusion
A) HFCS' nutritional value of sugars is very similar to that of plain sugar. -- No where is nutrition mentioned, so this is out of scope B) Reducing the consumption of HFCS will not result in lower glucose values. -- This looks good! " a recent experiment found that there was virtually no difference in glucose values among people who consumed equal amounts of either sugar or HFCS". This perfectly matches. C) Glucose values cannot be regarded as the only indicator of healthy nutrition. -- Healthy nutrition is not mentioned anywhere, so it is out of scope D) Glucose values remains steady no matter which diet people try. -- Diets are not mentioned anywhere, so it is out of scope E) Items from HFCS and plain sugar should both be considered unhealthy ingredients -- Who cares about healthy vs. unhealthy? We want to compare one to other other, not label both
Avoidance of purchasing food products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has become a growing trend among many consumers who believe that HFCS is less healthy than plain sugar, because of the percentage of sugars in HFCS. Nevertheless, a recent experiment found that there was virtually no difference in glucose values among people who consumed equal amounts of either sugar or HFCS. Glucose values represent the levels of sugar in the blood.
If the statements above are all accurate, they most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
A) HFCS' nutritional value of sugars is very similar to that of plain sugar.
B) Reducing the consumption of HFCS will not result in lower glucose values.
C) Glucose values cannot be regarded as the only indicator of healthy nutrition.
D) Glucose values remains steady no matter which diet people try.
E) Items from HFCS and plain sugar should both be considered unhealthy ingredients
Show more
Hi Folks!
Consumers believe that HFCS is less healthy as compared to plain sugar, because of percentage of sugars in it. However, an expt showed that glucoase levels to be identical for same amount consumed of either HFCS or plain sugar. This fact established ( assuming in a proper control group to remove sugar metabolism effects etc) shows that the consumer's belief is wrong.
A) HFCS' nutritional value of sugars is very similar to that of plain sugar. Seems to be bang on - the nutritional value of sugars ( i.e blood glucose levels ) has been proved via experiment to be identical.
B) Reducing the consumption of HFCS will not result in lower glucose values. Not mentioned anywhere in the passage, worng to assume as the amount of plain sugar & HFCS was identical in the experiment
C) Glucose values cannot be regarded as the only indicator of healthy nutrition. May be true but not relevant to the passage
D) Glucose values remains steady no matter which diet people try. Not relevant & most likely false!
E) Items from HFCS and plain sugar should both be considered unhealthy ingredients Subjective & irrelevant to the passage
Avoidance of purchasing food products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has become a growing trend among many consumers who believe that HFCS is less healthy than plain sugar, because of the percentage of sugars in HFCS. Nevertheless, a recent experiment found that there was virtually no difference in glucose values among people who consumed equal amounts of either sugar or HFCS. Glucose values represent the levels of sugar in the blood.
If the statements above are all accurate, they most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
A) HFCS' nutritional value of sugars is very similar to that of plain sugar.
B) Reducing the consumption of HFCS will not result in lower glucose values.
C) Glucose values cannot be regarded as the only indicator of healthy nutrition.
D) Glucose values remains steady no matter which diet people try.
E) Items from HFCS and plain sugar should both be considered unhealthy ingredients
Hi Folks!
Consumers believe that HFCS is less healthy as compared to plain sugar, because of percentage of sugars in it. However, an expt showed that glucoase levels to be identical for same amount consumed of either HFCS or plain sugar. This fact established ( assuming in a proper control group to remove sugar metabolism effects etc) shows that the consumer's belief is wrong.
A) HFCS' nutritional value of sugars is very similar to that of plain sugar. Seems to be bang on - the nutritional value of sugars ( i.e blood glucose levels ) has been proved via experiment to be identical.
B) Reducing the consumption of HFCS will not result in lower glucose values. Not mentioned anywhere in the passage, worng to assume as the amount of plain sugar & HFCS was identical in the experiment
C) Glucose values cannot be regarded as the only indicator of healthy nutrition. May be true but not relevant to the passage
D) Glucose values remains steady no matter which diet people try. Not relevant & most likely false!
E) Items from HFCS and plain sugar should both be considered unhealthy ingredients Subjective & irrelevant to the passage
Hence Option (A) is our choice.
Best, Gladi
Show more
I think you may have missed the following: "Nevertheless, a recent experiment found that there was virtually no difference in glucose values among people who consumed equal amounts of either sugar or HFCS"
Though I am intrigued that we have differing opinions
I think you may have missed the following: "Nevertheless, a recent experiment found that there was virtually no difference in glucose values among people who consumed equal amounts of either sugar or HFCS"
Though I am intrigued that we have differing opinions
I read your answer and gave it a thought. I think that " no difference in sugar value " with equal amounts of PS or HFCS is not equivalent to " Reducing the amount of HFCS will not lead to lower glucose levels " which is your selected answer choice.
Moreover, if the glucose levels are identical for PS & HFCS - plus we know the amounts consumed are identical - I think we can safely assume that the nutritional value is the same. The "value" of consuming anything is not mentioned but this answer choice makes the most sense to me from given ones.
I think you may have missed the following: "Nevertheless, a recent experiment found that there was virtually no difference in glucose values among people who consumed equal amounts of either sugar or HFCS"
Though I am intrigued that we have differing opinions
I read your answer and gave it a thought. I think that " no difference in sugar value " with equal amounts of PS or HFCS is not equivalent to " Reducing the amount of HFCS will not lead to lower glucose levels " which is your selected answer choice.
Moreover, if the glucose levels are identical for PS & HFCS - plus we know the amounts consumed are identical - I think we can safely assume that the nutritional value is the same. The "value" of consuming anything is not mentioned but this answer choice makes the most sense to me from given ones.
Nutrition is too broad of a topic for this question, in my opinion. We want a conclusion based on the information given. What does nutrition mean in this context? How is it valued and measured? Given that nutrition is never brought up, and given that health and glucose values are the key components here, I fail to see how this question cannot have an OA of B. This is my 2 cents. I will see if I can uncover the OA before it is revealed
This question, now that I know the OA is A, is not of great quality, as I have explained above. Do with it what you will, but I encourage everyone to stick to high-quality sources. If you stray from GMAT official sources, you get questions that can have misleading questions and explanations. I believe this a poor quality question.
It seems to be a confusing question,not to be relied upon by us.Nutrition is not related so narrowly ,so A is not a obvious best choice. Among the choices i will go with B.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.