Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 07:14 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 07:14
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,778
Own Kudos:
810,782
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,778
Kudos: 810,782
 [3]
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increas 20 Jul 2018, 02:01
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (01:50) correct 19% (01:54) wrong based on 769 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increases as the distance from the heat source decreases. Knowing this, most people conclude that the Earth`s seasons are caused by the Earth`s changing distance from the sun. In other words, winter occurs when the Earth is far from the sun, and summer occurs when the earth is close to the sun. However, we know that as North America experiences summer, South America experiences winter, even though the difference in the continents' distance to the sun is negligible. Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first describes a belief to which the scientist subscribes; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

B. The first describes a common belief that the scientist later deems to be ill conceived; the second is evidence against this belief.

C. The first is a statement presented in support of the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is the scientist`s conclusion.

D. The first describes a commonly held belief that is contrary to the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

E. The first describes a common belief that follows logically from the statement before it; the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
User avatar
SonalSinha803
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 303
Own Kudos:
324
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 303
Kudos: 324
 [1]
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increas 20 Jul 2018, 04:00
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The first describes a belief to which the ((scientist subscribes)); the second is evidence in support of this belief. - incorrect.

B. The first describes a //common belief that the scientist later deems to be ill conceived//; the second is //evidence against this belief.// - correct.

C. ((The first is a statement presented in support of the scientist`s final conclusion;)) the second is the scientist`s conclusion. - incorrect

D. The first describes a commonly held belief that is contrary to the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is ((evidence in support of this belief)). - incorrect

E. The first describes a common belief that follows logically from the statement before it; the second is factual information that the scientist ((deems to be irrelevant)) to her argument - incorrect

Thus, B is best.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
romil666
User avatar
GMAT Club News PM
Joined: 19 Jan 2019
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
90
Given Kudos: 852
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy)
Posts: 109
Kudos: 90
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increas 03 Feb 2021, 03:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increases as the distance from the heat source decreases. Knowing this, most people conclude that the Earth`s seasons are caused by the Earth`s changing distance from the sun. In other words, winter occurs when the Earth is far from the sun, and summer occurs when the earth is close to the sun. However, we know that as North America experiences summer, South America experiences winter, even though the difference in the continents' distance to the sun is negligible. Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first describes a belief to which the scientist subscribes; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

B. The first describes a common belief that the scientist later deems to be ill conceived; the second is evidence against this belief.

C. The first is a statement presented in support of the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is the scientist`s conclusion.

D. The first describes a commonly held belief that is contrary to the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

E. The first describes a common belief that follows logically from the statement before it; the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument.
Show more

Dear Experts,
AndrewN , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma ,

I was able to narrow it down to Options B and E. Though I selected the right option B, the second part of option E gave me a hard time :?

'the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument . Is the word 'argument' means the whole CR argument or just the conclusion (Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons) made by the scientist? What should I consider? :|

Regards,
Romil
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,663
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,663
 [2]
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increas 03 Feb 2021, 07:45
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
romil666
Bunuel
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increases as the distance from the heat source decreases. Knowing this, most people conclude that the Earth`s seasons are caused by the Earth`s changing distance from the sun. In other words, winter occurs when the Earth is far from the sun, and summer occurs when the earth is close to the sun. However, we know that as North America experiences summer, South America experiences winter, even though the difference in the continents' distance to the sun is negligible. Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first describes a belief to which the scientist subscribes; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

B. The first describes a common belief that the scientist later deems to be ill conceived; the second is evidence against this belief.

C. The first is a statement presented in support of the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is the scientist`s conclusion.

D. The first describes a commonly held belief that is contrary to the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

E. The first describes a common belief that follows logically from the statement before it; the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument.

Dear Experts,
AndrewN , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma ,

I was able to narrow it down to Options B and E. Though I selected the right option B, the second part of option E gave me a hard time :?

'the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument . Is the word 'argument' means the whole CR argument or just the conclusion (Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons) made by the scientist? What should I consider? :|

Regards,
Romil
Show more
Hello, Romil. Good question. The words argument and conclusion are sometimes used interchangeably in CR questions and answer choices. Sure, a premise plays an integral role in an argument, but it is not seen as the argument itself. A good idea for boldface questions in general is to see which answers you can disqualify based on one half or the other within the answer choices. If you are unsure about something but cannot disprove the first or the second half of any given answer, just place that option on hold while you assess the others. Such a strategy can make the difference between the person who builds off of positive momentum and answers efficiently and another person who seeks to qualify that one answer and wastes time and energy in that pursuit. To illustrate, the following is how I disqualified answers to this question, one by one:

Quote:
A. The first describes a belief to which the scientist subscribes
Show more
I did not bother considering this one beyond the semicolon, since I knew it was already inaccurate. The scientist goes against the commonly held belief.

Quote:
B. The first describes a common belief that the scientist later deems to be ill conceived; the second is evidence against this belief.
Show more
Looks fine. The first is what the scientist ends up arguing against, while the second is used to buttress the conclusion at the end. Leave this be.

Quote:
C. The first is a statement presented in support of the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is the scientist`s conclusion.
Show more
I did not feel great about the first part, but I did not write off the answer in the same way I had (A), so I looked at the second half. The conclusion definitely follows the therefore, so, with two reasons to doubt this answer, I ditched it.

Quote:
D. The first describes a commonly held belief that is contrary to the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is evidence in support of this belief.
Show more

I took a few seconds to make sure I understood exactly what this belief referred to, the belief of the scientist or that of the general populace. The only belief mentioned in the answer choice belongs to most people from the passage. A conclusion is more definitive. (A hypothesis might fall more into a grey area.) Since the second does not support the first, I saw off this answer choice.

Quote:
E. The first describes a common belief that follows logically from the statement before it; the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument.
Show more
Again, the first part checks out. But the second says that that second boldface is irrelevant to the argument the scientist (I guess a female one, although that was not brought up in the passage) herself puts forth, and that cannot be correct. When you see therefore in the final line of the passage, you understand that a conclusion is about to follow in some capacity (even if some conclusions contain conditional statements), and you also understand that the information that preceded the conclusion marker justifies the presence of that transition (again, therefore). The argument adopts a patent premise-conclusion structure in those last two lines, and that makes the second boldface quite relevant to the argument the scientist champions.

So, how could you tease apart (B) and (E) if you could not understand one choice or the other? I teach my students to work from a place of comfort. If, say, (E) gave you trouble, then work with the other option instead. If you cannot find a weakness, a compelling reason to doubt its correctness, then choose it; if you do harbor doubts, then go with the unknown, resting assured that you have found flaws in all the other choices. This is the power of deductive reasoning, and again, adopting such an approach can help you navigate these types of questions much easier and more proficiently.

I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask me.

- Andrew
User avatar
romil666
User avatar
GMAT Club News PM
Joined: 19 Jan 2019
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
90
Given Kudos: 852
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy)
Posts: 109
Kudos: 90
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increas 03 Feb 2021, 09:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
romil666
Bunuel
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increases as the distance from the heat source decreases. Knowing this, most people conclude that the Earth`s seasons are caused by the Earth`s changing distance from the sun. In other words, winter occurs when the Earth is far from the sun, and summer occurs when the earth is close to the sun. However, we know that as North America experiences summer, South America experiences winter, even though the difference in the continents' distance to the sun is negligible. Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first describes a belief to which the scientist subscribes; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

B. The first describes a common belief that the scientist later deems to be ill conceived; the second is evidence against this belief.

C. The first is a statement presented in support of the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is the scientist`s conclusion.

D. The first describes a commonly held belief that is contrary to the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

E. The first describes a common belief that follows logically from the statement before it; the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument.

Dear Experts,
AndrewN , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma ,

I was able to narrow it down to Options B and E. Though I selected the right option B, the second part of option E gave me a hard time :?

'the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument . Is the word 'argument' means the whole CR argument or just the conclusion (Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons) made by the scientist? What should I consider? :|

Regards,
Romil
Hello, Romil. Good question. The words argument and conclusion are sometimes used interchangeably in CR questions and answer choices. Sure, a premise plays an integral role in an argument, but it is not seen as the argument itself. A good idea for boldface questions in general is to see which answers you can disqualify based on one half or the other within the answer choices. If you are unsure about something but cannot disprove the first or the second half of any given answer, just place that option on hold while you assess the others. Such a strategy can make the difference between the person who builds off of positive momentum and answers efficiently and another person who seeks to qualify that one answer and wastes time and energy in that pursuit. To illustrate, the following is how I disqualified answers to this question, one by one:

Quote:
A. The first describes a belief to which the scientist subscribes
I did not bother considering this one beyond the semicolon, since I knew it was already inaccurate. The scientist goes against the commonly held belief.

Quote:
B. The first describes a common belief that the scientist later deems to be ill conceived; the second is evidence against this belief.
Looks fine. The first is what the scientist ends up arguing against, while the second is used to buttress the conclusion at the end. Leave this be.

Quote:
C. The first is a statement presented in support of the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is the scientist`s conclusion.
I did not feel great about the first part, but I did not write off the answer in the same way I had (A), so I looked at the second half. The conclusion definitely follows the therefore, so, with two reasons to doubt this answer, I ditched it.

Quote:
D. The first describes a commonly held belief that is contrary to the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

I took a few seconds to make sure I understood exactly what this belief referred to, the belief of the scientist or that of the general populace. The only belief mentioned in the answer choice belongs to most people from the passage. A conclusion is more definitive. (A hypothesis might fall more into a grey area.) Since the second does not support the first, I saw off this answer choice.

Quote:
E. The first describes a common belief that follows logically from the statement before it; the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument.
Again, the first part checks out. But the second says that that second boldface is irrelevant to the argument the scientist (I guess a female one, although that was not brought up in the passage) herself puts forth, and that cannot be correct. When you see therefore in the final line of the passage, you understand that a conclusion is about to follow in some capacity (even if some conclusions contain conditional statements), and you also understand that the information that preceded the conclusion marker justifies the presence of that transition (again, therefore). The argument adopts a patent premise-conclusion structure in those last two lines, and that makes the second boldface quite relevant to the argument the scientist champions.

So, how could you tease apart (B) and (E) if you could not understand one choice or the other? I teach my students to work from a place of comfort. If, say, (E) gave you trouble, then work with the other option instead. If you cannot find a weakness, a compelling reason to doubt its correctness, then choose it; if you do harbor doubts, then go with the unknown, resting assured that you have found flaws in all the other choices. This is the power of deductive reasoning, and again, adopting such an approach can help you navigate these types of questions much easier and more proficiently.

I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask me.

- Andrew
Show more

Got it got it, Sir!

Thank you! 🙌 :)
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,393
 [2]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,393
 [2]
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increas 03 Feb 2021, 22:34
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
romil666
Bunuel
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increases as the distance from the heat source decreases. Knowing this, most people conclude that the Earth`s seasons are caused by the Earth`s changing distance from the sun. In other words, winter occurs when the Earth is far from the sun, and summer occurs when the earth is close to the sun. However, we know that as North America experiences summer, South America experiences winter, even though the difference in the continents' distance to the sun is negligible. Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first describes a belief to which the scientist subscribes; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

B. The first describes a common belief that the scientist later deems to be ill conceived; the second is evidence against this belief.

C. The first is a statement presented in support of the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is the scientist`s conclusion.

D. The first describes a commonly held belief that is contrary to the scientist`s final conclusion; the second is evidence in support of this belief.

E. The first describes a common belief that follows logically from the statement before it; the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument.

Dear Experts,
AndrewN , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma ,

I was able to narrow it down to Options B and E. Though I selected the right option B, the second part of option E gave me a hard time :?

'the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument . Is the word 'argument' means the whole CR argument or just the conclusion (Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons) made by the scientist? What should I consider? :|

Regards,
Romil
Show more


Check this post for more on Boldface questions:
https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2017/0 ... questions/
User avatar
romil666
User avatar
GMAT Club News PM
Joined: 19 Jan 2019
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
90
Given Kudos: 852
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy)
Posts: 109
Kudos: 90
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increas 04 Feb 2021, 01:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
romil666


Dear Experts,
AndrewN , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma ,

I was able to narrow it down to Options B and E. Though I selected the right option B, the second part of option E gave me a hard time :?

'the second is factual information that the scientist deems to be irrelevant to her argument . Is the word 'argument' means the whole CR argument or just the conclusion (Therefore, the earth`s changing distance from the sun does not cause the seasons) made by the scientist? What should I consider? :|

Regards,
Romil


Check this post for more on Boldface questions:
https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2017/0 ... questions/
Show more

Thank you for sharing this! 🙌
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
1,009
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Scientist: All other things being equal, the intensity of heat increas 21 Jun 2023, 15:46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
501 posts
bhanu29
358 posts