Akela
Columnist: Shortsighted motorists learn the hard way about the wisdom of preventive auto maintenance; such maintenance almost always pays off in the long run. Our usually shortsighted city council should be praised for using similar wisdom when they hired a long-term economic development adviser. In hiring this adviser, the council made an investment that is likely to have a big payoff in several years. Other cities in this region that have devoted resources to economic development planning have earned large returns on such an investment.
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the columnist’s argument?
(A) Even some cars that receive regular preventive maintenance break down, requiring costly repairs.
(B) The columnist’s city has a much smaller population and economy than the other cities did when they began devoting resources to economic development planning.
(C) Most motorists who fail to perform preventive maintenance on their cars do so for nonfinancial reasons.
(D) Qualified economic development advisers generally demand higher salaries than many city councils are willing to spend.
(E) Cities that have earned large returns due to hiring economic development advisers did not earn any returns at all in the advisers’ first few years of employment.
Argument:
Preventive auto maintenance almost always pays off in the long run.
In hiring an adviser, the council made an investment that is likely to have a big payoff in several years.
Other cities in this region that have devoted resources to economic development planning have earned large returns on such an investment.
Conclusion: City council should be praised for using preventive maintenance wisdom by hiring an economic adviser which is likely to give a big payoff in several years.
We need to weaken the columnist's argument.
(A) Even some cars that receive regular preventive maintenance break down, requiring costly repairs.
Costly repairs does not mean that there wasn't significant benefit due to preventive maintenance. Even if some car owners do not see a significant benefit from regular maintenance, still most car owners could see significant benefit.
(B) The columnist’s city has a much smaller population and economy than the other cities did when they began devoting resources to economic development planning.
A premise of the columnist is that other cities that have such resources have earned large returns. This option tells us that this city is not comparable to the other cities that the columnist mentioned. Hence it weakens the columnist's argument.
(C) Most motorists who fail to perform preventive maintenance on their cars do so for nonfinancial reasons.
Reasons for not performing maintenance is irrelevant.
(D) Qualified economic development advisers generally demand higher salaries than many city councils are willing to spend.
The point is whether their salaries are worth, not whether they come within acceptable limits of city council spending.
(E) Cities that have earned large returns due to hiring economic development advisers did not earn any returns at all in the advisers’ first few years of employment.
The argument talks about payoff in several years. What happens in first few years is irrelevant.
Answer (B)