Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 16:57 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 16:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Raj30
Joined: 07 Jan 2019
Last visit: 26 May 2020
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
144
 [14]
Given Kudos: 103
Concentration: International Business, Finance
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 49
Kudos: 144
 [14]
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GmatPrime
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 22 Jul 2021
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 110
Kudos: 215
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SafSin28
Joined: 16 Aug 2022
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 84
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AdarshSambare
Joined: 29 Jan 2022
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 169
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 104
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
GPA: 2
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 169
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The passage says:

* Goose bumps were useful in animals with thick hair or feathers (insulation or defense).
* In humans, hair is too thin for that use.
* But goose bumps may now serve a “new role”: showing emotions like fear, rage, or pleasure.
* This makes them a **signal to others** (like flushing does).

So the author is basically saying: *Even though goose bumps are useless for insulation/defense, they might now be useful as a social signal.*

For that reasoning to hold, the author is assuming that **other people can perceive goose bumps and that such perception is beneficial somehow**. Otherwise, they couldn’t serve as a signal.

Now check the answer choices:

**A.** Emotional responses in humans can be triggered by thermoregulatory mechanisms.

* Not required. The argument is about goose bumps being *visible* signals, not about triggers.

**B.** The perceptibility of emotional responses to other humans offers some kind of benefit.

* Yes! This is the assumption. If signaling emotions had no benefit, goose bumps wouldn’t have acquired a new role.

**C.** If human hair were more substantial, goose bumps would not have acquired a new role.

* Interesting but irrelevant. Doesn’t matter for the argument.

**D.** Goose bumps in animals with feathers, fur, or quills may also be linked to emotional responses.

* Not needed. Passage is about humans.

**E.** In humans, goose bumps represent an older physiological response than flushing.

* Not discussed, irrelevant.

Correct Answer: **B**
Because the assumption is that showing emotional responses through goose bumps has *some advantage*, otherwise they wouldn’t have a meaningful “new role.”
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts