Spending on clothes in this country increased by 35% from 1970 to 1990. Over the same period, however, revenue from clothing sales actually made instores, whether retail or wholesale, only increased by 20% and most of that increase took place in national chain departmental stores.
Based on the above statements, which of the following is the most reasonable conclusion about the period from 1970 to 1990
Ok so there is an increase in spending by 35 pc but revenue from specific places are only 20%, what could be the reason
A. There was an increase in spending on clothes that were purchased thru alternate channels, such as thru the mail or over the phone.
Yea.. that is what i was thinking.. there should be some alternate channels from where the purchase must have been made. ContenderB. Spending on clothes decreased in those stores that were not national chain department stores
Incorrect answerC. The spending increase was not caused by people buying more clothes, but by an increase in clothing prices, both in retail stores and in wholesale outlets.
I dont care - Total amount of spending is what i care for - Out of scopeD. Most of the increase in spending on clothing was the result of an increase in sales of high price items to a relatively small number of people.
Again out of scope as CE. Most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores were made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores.[/quote]
Yeah that is Okay, but isnt the mail order division is part of national department store and that part of instores..A is correct