arya251294
I believe harsh is too strong a word, what if nobody assumes that imprisonment is hard but they assume that imprisonment is effective?
Please help.
The argument makes it clear that both sides think imprisonment is harsh.
"One side proposed that all the rebels be imprisoned in order to deter those who might be strongly tempted to rebel in the future"
- Why will possible imprisonment be a deterrent? Because imprisonment is a harsh penalty. If imprisonment were not harsh, then possible imprisonment would not deter anyone
"The other side argued against imprisonment because it would only discourage future insurrectionists from surrendering"
- why would rebels be discouraged from surrendering? Because surrender would lead to imprisonment, and imprisonment is harsh. If imprisonment were not harsh, the rebels would surrender and go to prison. If imprisonment is harsh, the rebels will prefer to continue fighting than to surrender
Hope this helps!
Posted from my mobile device