The clue to solving this question lies in the last statement provided. Which states that “however, for the last decade the estimate based on commercial tonnage has been increasing markedly, by about the same amount as the sampling-based estimate has been decreasing”.
Let the sampling based estimate ten years ago be y and estimate based on commercial tonnage 10 years ago be x.
From the statement above, if x increased by 10, then y decreased by 10 as well.
We already know from earlier argument that the yearly estimate is based on average of estimate based on commercial tonnage (x), and estimate based on sampling once in a year (y).
So in this case average will still be same since
Average= (x+10+y-10)/2 = (x+y)/2
This is clearly stated in option A, that last year’s official estimate was probably not much different from official estimate ten years ago. A is therefore the answer which most strongly support the arguments made in the question stem.
B is irrelevant because if the number of commercial fishing vessels for cod have gone up over the past decade, and yet the estimates based on commercial yield keeps going up, it only means that there is enough cod in the Grand Banks per unit fishing effort.
C is incorrect because nothing in the question stem suggests that the sampling based estimate is more accurate than the estimate based on commercial tonnage.
D is also incorrect because nothing in the argument shows that the estimate by commercial tonnage is not accurate hence sole reliance on estimate by sampling. This is because the data trend shows that the official estimate of cod has remained the same.
E is not necessarily true. This is because nothing in the question stem suggests that the stock of cod was higher twenty years ago than it is today.
Posted from my mobile device