Holdens Ltd. two subsidiaries performed with remarkable consistency ov

Question

Competition Mode Question

Holdens Ltd. two subsidiaries performed with remarkable consistency over the past five years: in each of those years, Lexton has accounted for roughly 30 percent of dollar sales and 60 percent of profits, and Still more for the balance.

Which of the following can properly be inferred regarding the past five years from the statement above?

A. Total dollar sales for each of the subsidiaries have remained roughly constant.
B. Lexton has faced stiffer competition in its markets than hasStill more.
C. Still more has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has Lexton.
D. The product mix offered by each of the company's divisions has remained unchanged.
E. Highly profitable products accounted for a higher percentage of Stillmore's sales than of those of Lexton.

madgmat2019 · Answer

C.Still more has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has Lexton.....It's clearly inferred from the data provided....Lexton has accounted for roughly 30 percent of dollar sales and ""60 percent of profits"".....

OA:C

Posted from my mobile device

OA:C

Posted from my mobile device

CareerGeek · Answer

Let the total dollar sales = D & Total profits = P

Profits per dollar of Lexton =  \frac{0.60*P}{0.30*D}  =  \frac{2P}{D} 
Profits per dollar of Still more =  \frac{0.40*P}{0.70*D}  =  \frac{4P}{7D} 
--> Still more has lower profits per dollar than Lexton

IMO Option C

Archit3110 · Answer

conclusion Lexton has accounted for roughly 30 percent of dollar sales and 60 percent of profits and still more has 70 percent of dollar sales and 40 percent of profits

IMO C; Still more has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has Lexton

Holdens Ltd. two subsidiaries performed with remarkable consistency over the past five years: in each of those years, Lexton has accounted for roughly 30 percent of dollar sales and 60 percent of profits, and Still more for the balance.

Which of the following can properly be inferred regarding the past five years from the statement above?

A. Total dollar sales for each of the subsidiaries have remained roughly constant.
B. Lexton has faced stiffer competition in its markets than hasStill more.
C. Still more has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has Lexton.
D. The product mix offered by each of the company's divisions has remained unchanged.
E. Highly profitable products accounted for a higher percentage of Stillmore's sales than of those of Lexton.

eakabuah · Answer

The answer is option C in my view.

Preambles: Holdens Ltd has two subsidiaries, and they performed with remarkable consistency over the past five years.
Each year Lexton accounts for about 30% of dollar sales and 60% of profits with Stillmore accounting for the rest.
Implying Stillmore accounts for about 70% of dollar sales and 30% of profits.

Option A: Total dollar sales for each of the subsidiaries have remained roughly constant. This is not necessarily true based on the information provided. The total dollar sales can be different in each of the five years but what we know is that Lexton accounts for 30% of the total sales and Stillmore accounts for 70%. Eliminate A.

B. Lexton has faced stiffer competition in its markets than has Stillmore. There is no information to suggest that Lexton faced stiffer competition compared with Stillmore per the argument. Eliminate option B.

C. Stillmore has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has Lexton.   Correct.   From the information provided, we can make a valid deduction that Stillmore realized lower profits per dollar of sales. This is because Stillmore's sales account for 70% of dollar sales while its profitability represents 40% of the total profits. It is therefore a valid deduction to make since these ratios are in reference to the total sales volume and profits of Holden Ltd.

D. The product mix offered by each of the company's divisions has remained unchanged. Irrelevant to the argument. Eliminate D.

E. Highly profitable products accounted for a higher percentage of Stillmore's sales than of those of Lexton. This is not a valid deduction from the information provided in the argument. In any case despite the fact that Stillmore's total sales are 70% of the total sales volume, its profits account for 30% of the total profits, hence it does not make much sense to say that highly profitable products account for a higher percentage of Stillmore's sales than Lexton. Eliminate E as well.

exc4libur · Answer

ARGUMENT
  Holdens two subs have performed consistently over the past years; 
  Lexton has accounted for 30% sales and 60% profits;
  Stillmore for the balance - I assume this means it accounted for the remaining 70% sales and 40% profits;
  Lexton accounted for a greater profit per sales dollar than Stillmore, since it sold less and profited more.

INFER
A. "sales have remained constant" not necessarily;
B. "L has stiffer competition x S" cannot be inferred;
D. "mix has remained unchanged" cannot be inferred;
E. not necessarily…;

Answer (C)

lacktutor · Answer

Lexton — 30% of dollar sales and 60% profits

Stillmore —50% of dollar sales and 50% profits

It’s inferred that Still more has lower profits per dollar of sales than a Lexton.

Only C matches the solution

The answer is C

Posted from my mobile device

siddharthkapoor · Answer

Let the total sales in the last 5 years be s and profit be p.

So, sales by Lexton=0.3s, so sales by Stillmore=0.7s
Similarly, profit by Lexton=0.6p, so profit by Stillmore=0.4p

Now, profit/(dollar sales) of Lexton= 0.6p/0.3s=2p/s and proft/(dollar sale) of Stillmore=0.4p/0.7s=4p/7s

Clearly, Lexton has a higher profit/(dollar sales) than Stillmore.

Therefore, option C fits with our understanding above, and thus is the correct answer.

Option A is wrong as we have no information on year by year sales of each company in each of the 5 years. We only have the data on proportion of sales for each company during this time.

Clearly, option B and D are out of scope.

Option E is wrong because we have no information to check the validity of this statement.

chaitralirr · Answer

Holdens Ltd. two subsidiaries performed with remarkable consistency over the past five years: in each of those years, Lexton has accounted for roughly 30 percent of dollar sales and 60 percent of profits, and Still more for the balance.

Which of the following can properly be inferred regarding the past five years from the statement above?

A. Total dollar sales for each of the subsidiaries have remained roughly constant.
B. Lexton has faced stiffer competition in its markets than hasStill more.
C. Still more has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has Lexton.
D. The product mix offered by each of the company's divisions has remained unchanged.
E. Highly profitable products accounted for a higher percentage of Stillmore's sales than of those of Lexton

The stimulus states the of the subsidiaries
1) Lexton: 30% dollar sales and accounts for 60% profits
2) Still More: 60% dollar sales and accounts for 40% profit

If we look at the above statistics it shows that though still more has more dollar same the profits are low as compared to Lexton

IMO C

Bunuel · Answer

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Correct Answer: C

The best answer is C. If Lexton has accounted for roughly 30 percent of dollar sales and 60 percent of profits, then it has realized more profit per dollar of sales than Stillmore. There are not enough facts to support the inferences reached in the other answers.

anshuliitd · Answer

Still more had 70% of dollar sales with 40% of profit while Lexton had 30% of dollar sales with 60% of profit. So clearly Still more has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has Lexton.
Hence Option C.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Holdens Ltd. two subsidiaries performed with remarkable consistency ov

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Holdens Ltd. two subsidiaries performed with remarkable consistency ov

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards