I believe A is the answer. The author argues that mowing down and plowing under the purple loosestrife may be the only way of eliminating the pest. Option A gives a specific possible alternative of doing so.
Attempts to control purple loosestrife (Lythrum Salicaria) have been only partially successful. It has proved resistant to many herbicides, and it is impervious to burning, as its rootstock lies beneath the surface and can reproduce from there. It can be mowed down and plowed under, and then replaced with a less invasive plant. This is very labor intensive in marshy areas that are substantially overgrown, but it may be the only way of eliminating the pest.
Which of the following information, if true, would provide the least support for the author's argument?
(A) Lythrum Salicaria has been removed from some gardens through the careful use of an Australian slug.
(B) Replanted meadows where purple loosestrife once grew are slowly being taken over by a new, hardier strain of Lythrum Salicaria.
(C) Cattails are coming back to some some New York swampland once devastated by the incursion of Lythrum Salicaria.
(D) Chopping up the rootstock of Lythrum Salicaria with a plow adds an unexpected bonus in the form of nitrogen-rich fertilizer.
(E) Mowing and replanting Lythrum Salicaria cost small communities along the Missouri River nearly $1 million last year.