Economist: The politician is trying to win over the hearts of the public by offering to lower taxes using money borrowed by the Federal Reserve from foreign banks. This is
as sensible as borrowing money in the name of your children and giving it to them to convince them of your affluence.
The economist's statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?
'As sensible as' suggests a comparison or drawing an analogy. But that 2nd element(children) of analogy seems to suggest that Economist is going agains the politician's act.
A. The Federal Reserve is borrowing money that
will not go to good use. - INCORRECT. Too blunt to say. Also, nothing such is derivable from the passage.
B. The ratio of debt to existing capital of the Federal Reserve is
similar to the rate of debt to existing capital of the parents in a household. - INCORRECT. May be or may be not. But more importantly it can't be said so confidently.
C. The public will eventually have to pay for the debts of the Federal Bank. - CORRECT. Seems more apt compared other 4 choices. The choice is against politician's act.
D. The Federal Reserve
should refrain from borrowing capital from foreign banks and
raise resources, instead, from issuing bonds to the American public. - INCORRECT. Big claims. Nothing suggested as such from the passage.
E. The continuing rise in the national debt may lead to the
collapse of the American economy. - INCORRECT. A similar choice as option B.
IMO Answer C.