Bunuel
Mayor: The recycling program costs us nearly $1 million to operate every year, and our budget shortfall this year is projected to be $5 million. We need to cut the recycling program in order to help balance the budget.
Consumer Advocate: It costs the city more to throw something out than to recycle it.
The consumer advocate responds to the mayor by
(A) establishing that the mayor's figures were incorrectly calculated
(B) accepting the mayor's conclusion but questioning the legality of the plan
(C) interpreting the mayor's evidence in a way that reduces the validity of the mayor's claim
(D) introducing a new piece of information that calls into question the validity of the mayor's conclusion
(E) pointing out that the mayor has not adequately considered the potential causes and effects of the budget shortfall
(A) establishing that the mayor's figures were incorrectly calculated
consumer advocate does not say that mayor's figures were incorrect
(B) accepting the mayor's conclusion but questioning the legality of the plan
consumer advocate does not accept or decline mayor's conclusion.
(C) interpreting the mayor's evidence in a way that reduces the validity of the mayor's claim
consumer advocate does not interpret mayor's evidence
(D) introducing a new piece of information that calls into question the validity of the mayor's conclusion
Yes, consumer advocate talked about the costs to throw something out than to recycle it, and it does calls into question the validity of the mayor's conclusion.
Correct(E) pointing out that the mayor has not adequately considered the potential causes and effects of the budget shortfall
No, consumer advocate does not pointing out that the mayor has not adequately considered the potential causes and effects of the budget shortfall
Hence IMO D