Bunuel
Sydonie: Parents differ in their beliefs about the rules to which their children should be subject. So any disciplinary structure in schools is bound to create resentment because it will contradict some parental approaches to raising children.
Stephanie: Your conclusion is incorrect; educational research shows that when parents list the things that they most want their children’s schools to provide, good discipline is always high on the list.
Stephanie’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that
(A) it focuses on educational research rather than educational practice
(B) it addresses a more general issue than that addressed in Sydonie’s argument
(C) it does not counter Sydonie’s suggestion that parents have diverse ideas of what constitutes good discipline
(D) the phrase “high on the list” is not specific enough to give useful information about what parents desire from a school
(E) it fails to discuss educators’ attitudes toward discipline in schools
EXPLANATION FROM Fox LSAT
I disagree with Syd, because I don’t think that
any (i.e.
every) disciplinary structure is bound to create resentment. What about a disciplinary structure that took into account parents’ differing beliefs? And I also disagree with Steph, because the fact that parents care about good discipline doesn’t mean they will
agree with each other about what “good discipline” means. So I disagree with both speakers, which is
good, because it means that I understand their arguments. This is going to be a piece of cake.
We’re asked to criticize Steph’s argument, which I have already done. Steph can suck it because, as I stated above, the fact that parents care about discipline doesn’t mean they will
agree with each other about what ‘good discipline’ means. The correct answer will probably say that in slightly different words. But that, my friends, is in essence gonna be the correct answer. Watch:
A) I don’t even know what this means. No way.
B) Definitely not what I’m looking for. We have such a strong prediction here that we are not going to waste time on bullshit. Next, please.
C) Yep. Steph totally ignored the part of Syd’s argument where Syd said “parents differ in their beliefs.” That was dumb of Steph, and that matches our prediction, and that’s why this is going to be the correct answer.
D) Nah. Lack of specificity, like failure to define a term, is almost never the correct answer. You don’t have to have a perfect definition or be perfectly specific at all times. If you did, your argument would always be encyclopedic in length. We’ve already found C, so this isn’t going to be it.
E) Who gives a **** what educators think? Their opinions are simply irrelevant here, since the arguments were about what parents think. This is out.
Our answer is C.