Ms. Campbell: Requiring students to pay for extracurricular activities will not make our program better. It would only produce an unequal distribution of students along socioeconomic lines, and that would defeat the purpose of the program, which is to make these activities available to all students.
Ms. Martin: But these programs are being cut all the time due to lack of funding.
The best assessment of the role of Ms. Martin's response in this argument is that itMs. Campbell argues that charging students would hurt the purpose of the program because the activities are supposed to be available to all students. Ms. Martin responds by pointing out that without funding, the programs are being cut.
So Ms. Martin is showing a weakness in Ms. Campbell’s reasoning: if the activities are cut due to lack of funds, then they may not remain available to all students anyway.
A. offers additional evidence for the correctness of Ms. Campbell's conclusion.
Wrong. Ms. Martin is not supporting Ms. Campbell. She is challenging the reasoning behind Ms. Campbell’s conclusion.
B. states one of Ms. Campbell's unspoken assumptions.
Wrong. Ms. Martin does not state something Ms. Campbell assumes. She raises a problem Ms. Campbell has not addressed.
C. contradicts Ms. Campbell's claim about the purpose of the program.
Wrong. Ms. Martin does not deny that the purpose is to make activities available to all students.
D. identifies a weakness in Ms. Campbell's rationale.
Correct. Ms. Martin points out that the programs are being cut because of lack of funding. This weakens Ms. Campbell’s argument by suggesting that refusing to charge students may also prevent the program from serving all students.
E. implies that Ms. Campbell's conclusion is correct, but not for the reasons given.
Wrong. Ms. Martin does not imply that Ms. Campbell is correct. She suggests that Ms. Campbell’s position may be impractical.
Answer: (D)