OFFICIAL KAPLAN EXPLANATION
Step 1: Identify the Question Type
The question asks for something that "casts the most doubt" on a view, making this a Weaken question.
Step 2: Untangle the Stimulus
The author provides evidence about five people. They were among a group of 50 who were provided hypnosis in order to treat mood swings. The author concludes (as suggested in the question stem) that these five people serve to show how successful hypnosis can be, based on evidence that their moods were stable when surveyed five years later.
Step 3: Predict the Answer
Note that the subjects display stable emotions "at the time of the survey." The author assumes their state of mind during the survey is representative of their state of mind in general. To weaken this argument, show how this assumption is mistaken. Perhaps the survey was done at an opportune time, but these people still have mood swings at other times (which, after all, is the very essence of how mood swings work). That would counter the suggestion that hypnosis helped them.
Step 4: Evaluate the Choices
(B) matches the prediction and is correct. This suggests the subjects have moments of stability, which would explain their behavior during the survey. However, they still have dramatic mood swings, so the hypnosis was not effective.
(A) does not weaken the claim. The author presented the people as models of different "types of people" who can be helped, not as a single model of a single personality type, so they needn't be similar.
(C) and (E) do not weaken the claim. The author is not suggesting that hypnosis helps everyone, just that it helped the five people in question. The other 45 people are irrelevant.
(D) is irrelevant, as the concern of many psychologists has no effect on how hypnosis could have helped with the mood swings.
TAKEAWAY: When a survey is conducted, consider representative issues. Make sure the conditions are representative of conditions in general.