In an effort to stimulate economic growth, the parliament of Sapland is promoting new legislation which halves the corporate tax rate. Members of parliament claim the move will lead to job creation and investment by the impacted corporations. Critics disagree vocally, pointing to a plethora of studies indicating that such tax savings tend to be kept as profit rather than reinvested, and therefore are unlikely to spur job creation or corporate investment.
Which of the following, if true, most undermines the critics objection to the tax plan promoted by parliament to spur job creation and corporate investment by halving the corporate tax rate?
A. The legislation halving the corporate tax rate includes a stipulation that funds equal to those owed in the form of taxes must be used by the impacted corporation to promote its primary business purpose.
B. The tax savings will induce the shareholders of many impacted corporations to increase their personal investment portfolios significantly.
C. Many corporate shareholders consider their respective corporations’ performance to be more than sufficient, and see no reason to expand either their workforces or capital investments.
D. The majority of the tax revenue lost due to the corporate tax rate reduction can be reclaimed by raising property taxes on large estates.
E. Sapland currently suffers from high unemployment, brought on by years of government-mandated anti-discrimination policies and environmental regulations.