The use of 24-hour closed-circuit television (CCTV) has sometimes enabled British police to catch criminals they would not otherwise catch, but this technology is not without controversy. In 2007, a British watchdog organization concluded that a majority of 24-hour CCTV cameras are operating in violation of privacy laws. Evidence illegally obtained cannot be used in court.
The information above, assuming all of it is true, supports which of the following conclusions?
A.
At least some British police catches based on CCTV will be acquitted. - wrong'will' indicates certainty. The passages doesn't have enough information to help achieve certainty of acquittal.
B.
A majority of CCTV cameras are not operated by the British government. - wrongDetails of who actually operates is not provided in the passage.
C.
Some United Kingdom citizens are concerned that even legal CCTV cameras are an invasion of their privacy. - wrongA British watchdog organization concluded that CCTVs operate in violation of privacy laws. It cannot be concluded that any citizen is concerned about privacy.
D.
Most of what is recorded on 24-hour CCTV in the United Kingdom would not hold up in court. - Correct'
majority of 24-hour CCTV cameras are operating in violation of privacy laws', since majority of CCTVs are in violation of privacy laws, most of recordings from these CCTVs are evidences illegally obtained and hence cannot hold up in court.
E.
CCTV is not an effective deterrent to crime. - wrongWe cannot conclude that CCTV doesn't deter crime. The only stated fact is that the evidence from CCTV cannot be used in court.