Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 12:33 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 12:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
hunglq
Joined: 24 Aug 2019
Last visit: 04 Aug 2024
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
5
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 2
Kudos: 5
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
hunglq
Joined: 24 Aug 2019
Last visit: 04 Aug 2024
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
5
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 2
Kudos: 5
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dprasadd
Joined: 16 Feb 2023
Last visit: 03 Jun 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
Posts: 18
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
HarshaBujji
Joined: 29 Jun 2020
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 723
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 247
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 723
Kudos: 906
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think C is the best fit.


As it highlights the difference between P. saturatus and M. barbatus reactions to alarm calls from neighboring species. It shows the inverse relation that the argument mentions.

Hence IMO C
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,396
 [1]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,396
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hunglq
Can anyone help me with this question?
I do not have the official answer.
-----
The bird species Myiobius barbatus (the bearded flycatcher), which forages in relatively dense vegetation, and Platyrinchus saturatus (the cinnamon-crested spadebill), which forages in open areas or low density vegetation, share territory in French Guiana with Thamnomanes caesius (the cinereous antshrike), which emits a loud alarm call when it detects predators. Biologist Ari Martinez and colleagues, who studied the ecological community the species share, hypothesized that there is an inverse relationship between birds' field of vision while foraging and their sensitivity to alarm calls from neighboring species

Which finding, if true, would most directly support Martinez and colleagues' hypothesis?

A. When Martinez and colleagues played T. caesius alarm calls. M. barbatus and P. saturatus displayed no reaction, whereas T. caesius displayed predator-avoidance behavior.

B. Many local bird species with similar foraging habits to those of M. barbatus displayed no reaction when Martinez and colleagues played T. caesius alarm calls, whereas M. barbarus displayed predator -avoidance behavior.

C. Some individuals of P. saturatus displayed predator-avoidance behavior when Martinez and colleagues played T. caesius alarm calls, whereas nearly all did when M. barbatus alarm calls were played.

D. P. saturatus displayed no reaction when Martinez and colleagues played T. caesius alarm calls, whereas M. barbaris displayed predator avoidance behavior in response to the calls.

Myio forages in dense vegetation (so they have low field of vision. They cannot see very far because of trees blocking view all around).
Platy forages in open areas (so high field of vision...can see far in open areas)
Thamno emits a loud call when it detects predators

Biologists hypothesized that there is an inverse relationship between birds' field of vision while foraging and their sensitivity to alarm calls from neighboring species.

What would help this hypothesis?

If Myio (low field of vision) reacted to warning calls from other species but Platy (high field of vision) did not react, then that would support our hypothesis.

A. When Martinez and colleagues played T. caesius alarm calls. M. barbatus and P. saturatus displayed no reaction, whereas T. caesius displayed predator-avoidance behavior.

This says that Myio and Platy both did not react to warning calls which came from other species and only Thamno reacted (to a call supposedly coming from its own members).
This does not establish any connection between the field of vision and warning calls.

B. Many local bird species with similar foraging habits to those of M. barbatus displayed no reaction when Martinez and colleagues played T. caesius alarm calls, whereas M. barbarus displayed predator -avoidance behavior.

Myio and Myio like species both have same field of vision (because of same foraging habits in high vegetation areas). If one reacted but the other did not, it doesn't help our hypothesis which compares high field of vision with low field of vision.

C. Some individuals of P. saturatus displayed predator-avoidance behavior when Martinez and colleagues played T. caesius alarm calls, whereas nearly all did when M. barbatus alarm calls were played.

Here, the distinction is being made between the warning calls (Thamno's warning call vs Myio's warning call). Myio's warning call has not been discussed anywhere in the argument. We are discussing different fields of vision, not different warning calls.

D. P. saturatus displayed no reaction when Martinez and colleagues played T. caesius alarm calls, whereas M. barbaris displayed predator avoidance behavior in response to the calls.

Platy did not react on Thamno's warning calls but Myio did react. This is what we were looking for. This does support our hypothesis.

Answer (D)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts