It has not been scientifically proven that ghosts do not exist. Furthe

Question

It has not been scientifically proven that ghosts do not exist. Furthermore, since there have been several failed attempts to produce such a proof, whether through scientific experiments or through close observation, one must conclude that ghosts are in fact real.

The reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

A. Takes for granted that the number of unsuccessful attempts to prove a claim is the only factor relevant to whether one should accept that claim.
B. Overlooks the possibility that some of the scientific experiments mentioned reached inaccurate conclusions
C. Takes for granted that the fact that a claim has not been demonstrated to be false establishes that it is true
D. Takes for granted that there is no scientific way to determine whether ghosts are real or not
E. Overlooks the possibility that the scientific experiments were poorly conducted

vasu1104 · Answer

Can anyone explpain this question? I found it bit complicated somehow. 
Appreciate your help.
Thank you in advance.

onyiilawal · Answer

Yea, i’ld also like an explanation to the question

Posted from my mobile device

sarvanand00 · Answer

The question asks us to find the vulnerability of the arguments made by author to reach the conclusion "the ghosts exist", and after reading the options only A & C discuss that vulnerability that the author has taken for granted that if a claim can't be proven wrong then it is right, however A talks about number of times which is irrelevant to the question, so C is the final answer.

Paras96 · Answer

Certainly, let's explain why  option (C)  is the correct answer:

The argument is essentially saying that because there is no scientific proof that ghosts do not exist and because there have been unsuccessful attempts to produce such proof, one must conclude that ghosts are real. This line of reasoning is making a significant logical mistake, and here's why:

1. **Assuming absence of proof is proof of presence:** The argument incorrectly assumes that the absence of scientific proof for the non-existence of ghosts is proof of their existence. In other words, it suggests that if something has not been proven to be false, it must be true. This is a logical fallacy known as "argument from ignorance" or "argument from lack of evidence."

2. **Fails to consider other possibilities:** It doesn't consider that the absence of proof for the non-existence of ghosts could be due to various reasons, such as the difficulty in studying supernatural phenomena, limitations in current scientific methods, or the possibility that ghosts simply do not exist. It doesn't consider alternative explanations for the lack of proof.

3. **Ignores the burden of proof:** In matters of scientific inquiry, the burden of proof typically falls on those making the positive claim. In this case, if someone claims that ghosts exist, it is their responsibility to provide evidence to support that claim. The absence of evidence against a claim does not automatically prove the claim to be true.

Option (C) directly addresses these issues by pointing out the logical fallacy in the argument. It correctly criticizes the argument for assuming that the absence of proof against the existence of ghosts establishes their truth. In reality, lack of evidence against something does not automatically make it true; it simply means there is no conclusive evidence either way, and the claim remains unproven.

unraveled · Answer

Let me help with my view. 
The passage says X(ghosts) has not be proven to not exist. If methods chosen(scientific ones or observation) could not do so, then that means X do exist.
So, isn't this a little something that leaves one fuming to digest.

Take for example:
A politician claims since scientists could not prove that aliens exist, it is very well be said that aliens do not exist.

Please note that here
aliens exist = ghosts do not exist

or vice-a-versa.

It has not been scientifically proven that ghosts do not exist. Furthermore, since there have been several failed attempts to produce such a proof, whether through scientific experiments or through close observation, one must conclude that ghosts are in fact real.

The reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

A. Takes for granted that the  number of unsuccessful attempts to prove a claim is the only factor  relevant to whether one should accept that claim. - WRONG. Not about the number of attempts but what those lead to conclude and why. 
B.  Overlooks  the possibility that some of the scientific experiments mentioned reached  inaccurate conclusions  - WRONG. Already covered. 
C. Takes for granted that the fact that a claim has not been demonstrated to be false establishes that it is true - CORRECT. POE helps. If one side is not proved then that doesn't mean that other side is proven.
D. Takes for granted that  there is no scientific way to determine  whether ghosts are real or not - WRONG. Absolute claim that goes offtrack, losing focus. 
E.  Overlooks  the possibility that the scientific experiments were  poorly conducted  - WRONG. Already covered like B.

HTHs.

Answer C

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

It has not been scientifically proven that ghosts do not exist. Furthe

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

It has not been scientifically proven that ghosts do not exist. Furthe

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards