sunnypv
Could you please discuss in detail in each choice?
Here was my reasoning:
First I read the question:
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, argues most strongly that Grimshaw's employees did in fact heed the company's request?
And IDed that this was an 'assumption family' question. That is to say: an argument, with premise, conclusion, and assumptions.
Quote:
Grimshaw, Inc., found that the cost of paying for the health care benefits of its employees had been gradually increasing for over five years to a point where the company felt that company-provided health care benefits might soon be in jeopardy. Last year, Grimshaw requested its employees to be cost conscious about their use of health care services whenever possible, yet the company's health-care-benefit costs have continued to increase at approximately the same rate.
Interestingly, this paragraph does NOT include a conclusion! But I'm still trying to 'strengthen' the idea that the employees heeded the request (which I now know was to be cost conscious about their health care services).
The information in the paragraph led me to believe that maybe they *weren't*, since costs increased for the company again!
So I realize this is a kind of 'weaken' the argument, or perhaps an 'explain the discrepancy' question (which I regard a kind of 'weakener.'
My goal is this:
"How could the employees have been cost conscious about health care services EVEN THOUGH the overall health care costs to the company continued to increase?"
Essentially, we have a 'price' vs 'quantity situation going on here. Either the employees got MORE (but at a lower price) health care enough to increase overall spending, or they got it at a higher price (or some combination of both!)
But how could they get it at a higher price AND be price conscious??? Well... if prices increased, and they actually chose the cheap option. That is to say, there might have been a world where they were not price conscious and overall healthcare spending to the company *increased even more*!
Okay so I go to the answers with these goals/thoughts in mind: "Did they increase their consumption of health care services or were prices increasing such that they could have chosen even MORE expensive health care?"
Quote:
A) Grimshaw gave its employees the names of several physicians who provide high-quality health care services at below-average cost.
If the doctor's prices are below average... why did overall spending go up? This does't explain the phenomenon in question.
Quote:
B) The percentage of Grimshaw's employees who exercise regularly has not declined since last year.
If *anything*, this does the opposite of what I need. If they *were* exercising less, maybe they'd need less health care (but that seems like a huge logical leap for the GMAT...), but this says they aren't exercising less. So why do they need more health care? What's going on with prices? Not helpful.
Quote:
C) Grimshaw made its request believing that many employees had been using the services of physicians who occasionally ordered unneeded tests.
This explains why Grimshaw made the request, but not why the request could have been followed but Grimshaw's healthcare expenditures still increased.
Quote:
D) The cost of paying for employee health care benefits represents a larger proportion of Grimshaw's overall corporate expenses this year than last year.
The overall corporate expenses aren't relevant to the question at hand.
Quote:
E) In the year since Grimshaw made its request, health care costs in general have increased sharply in the part of the country where Grimshaw is located.
Boom. That's one of the possibilities I was curious about: did prices increase a lot, and the employees chose cheaper options from what was available? This could explain how they *were* cost conscious, but healthcare expenditures still increased.
TAKEAWAYS:
1). Goal setting in CR is crucial, and in my experience students don't practice it enough. They jump too fast to the answers before really knowing what they need the right answer to *do*.
2). When dealing with 'total cost' questions, remember price*quantity.
3). Be aware of what's possible and don't make snap assumptions. If you thought about price and quantity and figured, "Well since they're being price conscious, they're not paying higher prices, so it must be that the employees got more healthcare this year," then you might not think enough about 'E' to realize it is correct.
"Paying higher prices" is not *always* the same thing as "not being price conscious."
Here's another study-tip: as you study for the GMAT, you want to look for problems that have similarities. Early on it's difficult to do, but over time, problems should remind you of other problems. As I did this problem, I was reminded of one of the following three. See if you can identify which one and why:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-law-of-d ... 36898.htmlhttps://gmatclub.com/forum/a-year-ago-d ... 90202.htmlhttps://gmatclub.com/forum/manufacturer ... 64132.html