by: ssfocus
21 mins
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2107:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
47% (02:09) correct
53%
(02:20)
wrong
based on 835
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Musician: Ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of standardized notation. Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
Which of the following principles, if accepted, would most help justify the conclusion of the musician's argument?
(A) When transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions, ethnomusicologists should do so in consultation with practitioners of those traditions.
(B) Ethnomusicologists should never attempt to influence other cultures' musical preferences and judgments.
(C) Any culture's judgments about which features of its music are most subtle are more important than the judgments of ethnomusicologists from other cultures.
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
(E) When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music.
Which of the following principles, if accepted, would most help justify the conclusion of the musician's argument?
(A) When transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions, ethnomusicologists should do so in consultation with practitioners of those traditions.
(B) Ethnomusicologists should never attempt to influence other cultures' musical preferences and judgments.
(C) Any culture's judgments about which features of its music are most subtle are more important than the judgments of ethnomusicologists from other cultures.
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
(E) When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music.
Trying to understand why the right answer is right?
GMAT Club Tests explanations walk through concepts, shortcuts, and common traps on many questions.
See how →
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 2,161
Updated on: 19 Jan 2025, 08:46
Originally posted by MartyMurray on 11 Feb 2024, 08:06.
Last edited by MartyMurray on 19 Jan 2025, 08:46, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by MartyMurray on 19 Jan 2025, 08:46, edited 1 time in total.
Explanation
Musician: Ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of standardized notation. Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
The musician has concluded the following:
Ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of standardized notation.
The support for the conclusion is the following:
Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
We see that the musician's point is about an issue with using a "system of standardized notation." The issue is that the use of such a system will not result in subtleties in the music regarded as essential being captured by the transcription. So, the system of notation is what causes the problem.
Which of the following principles, if accepted, would most help justify the conclusion of the musician's argument?
The correct answer will state a principle that "justifies the conclusion." In other words, the correct answer will be a statement such that the conclusion follows from the evidence if that principle holds.
So, this question works somewhat like an Assumption question in that the conclusion follows from the evidence if the principle is assumed to hold.
(A) When transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions, ethnomusicologists should do so in consultation with practitioners of those traditions.
Notice that the issue presented by the musician is not that ethnomusicologists don't consult with practitioners of cultural traditions. The issue is that ethnomusicologists' use of "any system of standardized notation" is likely to cause a transcription to "filter out subtleties."
Simply put, the problem is caused by systems of notation, not by lack of understanding of cultural traditions.
So, this choice is incorrect because the principle must support a point about the use of a system of notation, not a point about consulting with practitioners of cultural traditions.
Eliminate.
(B) Ethnomusicologists should never attempt to influence other cultures' musical preferences and judgments.
The musician's conclusion is about a problem caused by the use of a "standardized system of notation": transcriptions don't capture subtleties.
The musician doesn't say anything about ethnomusicologists attempting to "influence ... preferences and judgments."
Eliminate.
(C) Any culture's judgments about which features of its music are most subtle are more important than the judgments of ethnomusicologists from other cultures.
This choice is a little tricky to eliminate because it comes close to the heart of the issue presented by the musician, which is that subtleties are not captured in transcriptions.
So, what we need to see is that the issue is not that ethnomusicologists' transcriptions don't capture subtleties because ethnomusicologists make "judgments about which features of its music are most subtle." The musician doesn't say that ethnomusicologists judge anything.
The issue is that the use of a "system of standardized notation" causes the transcription to "filter out subtleties.''
Eliminate.
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
Let's review the musician's argument.
The conclusion is basically that ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music in a certain way, which is by using a system of standardized notation.
Then, the reason the musician presents for why ethnomusicologists should not use a system of standardized notation is that "Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential."
So, the musician is saying, basically, "This way should not be used because it doesn't capture subtleties."
We see that the musician's argument works only if the principle that ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture subtleties holds. After all, if that principle does not hold, then there's no reason not to transcribe music using a system of notation that doesn't capture those subtleties. Sure it doesn't capture those subtleties, but there's no reason why it has to.
So, we can see that the musician's conclusion is justified by this choice.
Keep.
(E) When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music.
Notice that the topic of the argument and the topic of this choice are not the same.
The topic of the argument is that a "transcription is likely to filter out subtleties." In other words, the argument brings up the issue that a type of transcription will not capture subtleties.
The topic of this choice is that "it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential." In other words, this choice is about determining which of all the subtleties in a piece of music are essential.
Recognizing which subtleties are essential and capturing them are two different things.
Let's consider why exactly this difference means that this choice is not the correct answer.
The point of the argument is basically that transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions using a system of standardized notation "should not" be attempted since it WILL NOT WORK because essential subtleties will be lost.
OK, so, what if this choice is not true and it is NOT important to "recognize which subtleties are essential"? In that case, will transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions using a system of standardized notation work?
No, because regardless of whether anyone recognizes which subtleties are essential and which are not, such a transcription will likely filter out subtleties. So, the transcription will not capture the essential subtleties of the music. In other words, it won't be faithful to the original because such a transcription, by nature of the notations involved, simply cannot capture essential subtleties.
Simply put, the argument is not about determining which subtleties are essential. It's about not losing the essential subtleties.
Thus, the argument, which is basically that such a transcription should not be attempted because it won't be faithful to the original, works regardless of whether it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential.
Eliminate.
Correct answer: D
_________________
Musician: Ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of standardized notation. Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
The musician has concluded the following:
Ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of standardized notation.
The support for the conclusion is the following:
Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
We see that the musician's point is about an issue with using a "system of standardized notation." The issue is that the use of such a system will not result in subtleties in the music regarded as essential being captured by the transcription. So, the system of notation is what causes the problem.
Which of the following principles, if accepted, would most help justify the conclusion of the musician's argument?
The correct answer will state a principle that "justifies the conclusion." In other words, the correct answer will be a statement such that the conclusion follows from the evidence if that principle holds.
So, this question works somewhat like an Assumption question in that the conclusion follows from the evidence if the principle is assumed to hold.
(A) When transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions, ethnomusicologists should do so in consultation with practitioners of those traditions.
Notice that the issue presented by the musician is not that ethnomusicologists don't consult with practitioners of cultural traditions. The issue is that ethnomusicologists' use of "any system of standardized notation" is likely to cause a transcription to "filter out subtleties."
Simply put, the problem is caused by systems of notation, not by lack of understanding of cultural traditions.
So, this choice is incorrect because the principle must support a point about the use of a system of notation, not a point about consulting with practitioners of cultural traditions.
Eliminate.
(B) Ethnomusicologists should never attempt to influence other cultures' musical preferences and judgments.
The musician's conclusion is about a problem caused by the use of a "standardized system of notation": transcriptions don't capture subtleties.
The musician doesn't say anything about ethnomusicologists attempting to "influence ... preferences and judgments."
Eliminate.
(C) Any culture's judgments about which features of its music are most subtle are more important than the judgments of ethnomusicologists from other cultures.
This choice is a little tricky to eliminate because it comes close to the heart of the issue presented by the musician, which is that subtleties are not captured in transcriptions.
So, what we need to see is that the issue is not that ethnomusicologists' transcriptions don't capture subtleties because ethnomusicologists make "judgments about which features of its music are most subtle." The musician doesn't say that ethnomusicologists judge anything.
The issue is that the use of a "system of standardized notation" causes the transcription to "filter out subtleties.''
Eliminate.
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
Let's review the musician's argument.
The conclusion is basically that ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music in a certain way, which is by using a system of standardized notation.
Then, the reason the musician presents for why ethnomusicologists should not use a system of standardized notation is that "Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential."
So, the musician is saying, basically, "This way should not be used because it doesn't capture subtleties."
We see that the musician's argument works only if the principle that ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture subtleties holds. After all, if that principle does not hold, then there's no reason not to transcribe music using a system of notation that doesn't capture those subtleties. Sure it doesn't capture those subtleties, but there's no reason why it has to.
So, we can see that the musician's conclusion is justified by this choice.
Keep.
(E) When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music.
Notice that the topic of the argument and the topic of this choice are not the same.
The topic of the argument is that a "transcription is likely to filter out subtleties." In other words, the argument brings up the issue that a type of transcription will not capture subtleties.
The topic of this choice is that "it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential." In other words, this choice is about determining which of all the subtleties in a piece of music are essential.
Recognizing which subtleties are essential and capturing them are two different things.
Let's consider why exactly this difference means that this choice is not the correct answer.
The point of the argument is basically that transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions using a system of standardized notation "should not" be attempted since it WILL NOT WORK because essential subtleties will be lost.
OK, so, what if this choice is not true and it is NOT important to "recognize which subtleties are essential"? In that case, will transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions using a system of standardized notation work?
No, because regardless of whether anyone recognizes which subtleties are essential and which are not, such a transcription will likely filter out subtleties. So, the transcription will not capture the essential subtleties of the music. In other words, it won't be faithful to the original because such a transcription, by nature of the notations involved, simply cannot capture essential subtleties.
Simply put, the argument is not about determining which subtleties are essential. It's about not losing the essential subtleties.
Thus, the argument, which is basically that such a transcription should not be attempted because it won't be faithful to the original, works regardless of whether it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential.
Eliminate.
Correct answer: D
_________________
Perfect scoring coach with a history of helping test-takers achieve their goals
https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Contact me for a free consultation.
https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Contact me for a free consultation.
General Discussion
Posts: 5,201
Musician: Ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of standardized notation. Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
Which of the following principles, if accepted, would most help justify the conclusion of the musician's argument?
(A) When transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions, ethnomusicologists should do so in consultation with practitioners of those traditions.
(B) Ethnomusicologists should never attempt to influence other cultures' musical preferences and judgments.
(C) Any culture's judgments about which features of its music are most subtle are more important than the judgments of ethnomusicologists from other cultures.
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
(E) When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music.
The passage talks about how Ethnomusicologists should not transcribe music from very different cultural traditions using a system of standardized notation. This is because the subtleties a culture may feel are vital but don't "fit" into the notational categories of another will probably get filtered out.
We're asked to look for something that helps justify the conclusion.
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
(D) is the answer. This is something you almost require. If, for example, you did NOT care what the culture you're transcribing the music of thinks is important, you could transcribe anyway you felt was "good enough". Imagine if certain pauses in a piece of music were very important to its author but did not fit into your standardized notation. It's only if you felt the same and cared what the author felt, that you would think there was a problem.
Which of the following principles, if accepted, would most help justify the conclusion of the musician's argument?
(A) When transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions, ethnomusicologists should do so in consultation with practitioners of those traditions.
(B) Ethnomusicologists should never attempt to influence other cultures' musical preferences and judgments.
(C) Any culture's judgments about which features of its music are most subtle are more important than the judgments of ethnomusicologists from other cultures.
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
(E) When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music.
The passage talks about how Ethnomusicologists should not transcribe music from very different cultural traditions using a system of standardized notation. This is because the subtleties a culture may feel are vital but don't "fit" into the notational categories of another will probably get filtered out.
We're asked to look for something that helps justify the conclusion.
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
(D) is the answer. This is something you almost require. If, for example, you did NOT care what the culture you're transcribing the music of thinks is important, you could transcribe anyway you felt was "good enough". Imagine if certain pauses in a piece of music were very important to its author but did not fit into your standardized notation. It's only if you felt the same and cared what the author felt, that you would think there was a problem.
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 151
AjiteshArun MartyMurray
I need help in understanding why E is not correct.
If recognition of subtelities is not important during transcription, then the conclusion that standardised notation should not be attempted is undermined, because the fact that standardised notation filters out subtelities is not important anymore thereby nullifying the the impact of first evidence !
I have presented the entire analysis below:
Premise : Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
Conclusion : Ethnomusicologists studying music from [radically different cultural traditions] should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of [standardized notation.]
~ Talking about Ethnomusicologists from different tradition (x) studying different tradition (y)
~ Transcription only using standardized notation is not recommended, we are not banning in general transcription
In nutshell because subtelities that the culture deems important are filtered out by standardised notation of transcription, Ethnomusicologists must not do so We need additional evidence to make the conclusion strong D fits properly.
Pls see option analysis below
[quote="katkot"]Musician: Ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of standardized notation. Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
Which of the following principles, if accepted, would most help justify the conclusion of the musician's argument?
(A) When transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions, ethnomusicologists should do so in consultation with practitioners of those traditions.
But even if they do consult others, and continue to transcribe using standardized notation then those subtleties may still be missed, so doesn't fill the gap - OUT
(B) Ethnomusicologists should never attempt to influence other cultures' musical preferences and judgments.
This is very extreme and out of context - because transcription has been changed to 'influence' - OUT. If we do argue in this way that As transcription precludes the subtleties, hence Ethno shouldn't influence others...this becomes a new conclusion than supporting existing conclusion. - OUT again
(C) Any culture's judgments about which features of its music are most subtle are more important than the judgments of ethnomusicologists from other cultures.
Even if we negate it, the argument doesn't shake because even if ethnomusicologists from other cultures have better judgement of subtleties, they might still lose those subtleties during transcription by standardization notation
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
NEGATION: Ethnomusicologists should NOT transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important. Implying they could transcribe in all other ways!
Then conclusion shakes because now transcription could be attempted! Hence this is correct.
(E) When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music.
NEGATION: When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is NOT important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music. [/quote]
I need help in understanding why E is not correct.
If recognition of subtelities is not important during transcription, then the conclusion that standardised notation should not be attempted is undermined, because the fact that standardised notation filters out subtelities is not important anymore thereby nullifying the the impact of first evidence !
I have presented the entire analysis below:
Premise : Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
Conclusion : Ethnomusicologists studying music from [radically different cultural traditions] should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of [standardized notation.]
~ Talking about Ethnomusicologists from different tradition (x) studying different tradition (y)
~ Transcription only using standardized notation is not recommended, we are not banning in general transcription
In nutshell because subtelities that the culture deems important are filtered out by standardised notation of transcription, Ethnomusicologists must not do so We need additional evidence to make the conclusion strong D fits properly.
Pls see option analysis below
[quote="katkot"]Musician: Ethnomusicologists studying music from radically different cultural traditions should not attempt to transcribe that music using any system of standardized notation. Any such transcription is likely to filter out subtleties that the culture producing the music may regard as essential but that do not conform to notational categories imported from another culture.
Which of the following principles, if accepted, would most help justify the conclusion of the musician's argument?
(A) When transcribing music from radically different cultural traditions, ethnomusicologists should do so in consultation with practitioners of those traditions.
But even if they do consult others, and continue to transcribe using standardized notation then those subtleties may still be missed, so doesn't fill the gap - OUT
(B) Ethnomusicologists should never attempt to influence other cultures' musical preferences and judgments.
This is very extreme and out of context - because transcription has been changed to 'influence' - OUT. If we do argue in this way that As transcription precludes the subtleties, hence Ethno shouldn't influence others...this becomes a new conclusion than supporting existing conclusion. - OUT again
(C) Any culture's judgments about which features of its music are most subtle are more important than the judgments of ethnomusicologists from other cultures.
Even if we negate it, the argument doesn't shake because even if ethnomusicologists from other cultures have better judgement of subtleties, they might still lose those subtleties during transcription by standardization notation
(D) Ethnomusicologists should transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important.
NEGATION: Ethnomusicologists should NOT transcribe music only in ways that capture the subtleties that the culture producing the music considers important. Implying they could transcribe in all other ways!
Then conclusion shakes because now transcription could be attempted! Hence this is correct.
(E) When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music.
NEGATION: When transcribing music from different cultural traditions, it is NOT important to recognize which subtleties are essential to that music. [/quote]
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 2,161
Kavicogsci
I've edited my explanation for (E) above. See whether it works for you now, and please let me know if you have further questions.
_________________
Perfect scoring coach with a history of helping test-takers achieve their goals
https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Contact me for a free consultation.
https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Contact me for a free consultation.
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
_________________
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
_________________
Moderators:
Announcements
How to Tell If Your GMAT Prep Resources Are Actually Helping You
Subscribe to GMAT Club for New Podcast Episodes, Debriefs, & Insightful Sessions on GMAT Preparation
Subscribe to GMAT Club for New Podcast Episodes, Debriefs, & Insightful Sessions on GMAT Preparation
Tuck at Dartmouth
AI at Dartmouth Tuck: How the School Is Preparing Leaders for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos
Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.