Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 04:23 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 04:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
DerekLin
Joined: 26 Nov 2023
Last visit: 27 Feb 2024
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
1,767
 [48]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 42
Kudos: 1,767
 [48]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
42
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,848
Own Kudos:
7,114
 [11]
Given Kudos: 213
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,848
Kudos: 7,114
 [11]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,204
Own Kudos:
1,576
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,204
Kudos: 1,576
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sanebeyondone
Joined: 22 Sep 2023
Last visit: 15 Mar 2025
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Posts: 26
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For me as to why choice E. is not correct is because it's about whether or not "certain microorganisms improve the function of the immune system." NOT "certain allergens cause allergies and therefore this improved the immune system specifically for certain allergens from early childhood exposure "
User avatar
napolean92728
User avatar
CAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Oct 2024
Last visit: 09 Apr 2026
Posts: 278
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 233
Status:Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.
Posts: 278
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer: C
The correct answer is (C) How the lifestyles of children on farms tend to be distinctive in other ways known to affect the function of the immune system.

Explanation:
The doctor's argument establishes a correlation between growing up on farms with exposure to animal germs and lower allergy rates, then concludes this exposure to microorganisms improves immune function. Option C is most helpful for evaluating this argument because it addresses potential confounding variables - other lifestyle factors of farm children that might affect immune function. If farm children's lifestyles differ in multiple ways that affect immunity, then we can't confidently attribute the lower allergy rates solely to microorganism exposure.

Why each other option is incorrect:
(A) Whether farm animals develop allergies from microorganism exposure is irrelevant to evaluating the claim about human immune system development.
(B) The specific species of microorganisms that farm children encounter doesn't help evaluate whether exposure to these microorganisms (rather than other factors) is responsible for improved immune function.
(D) While potentially interesting, information about adults who work with farm animals doesn't directly evaluate the doctor's claim about childhood exposure's effect on immune development.
(E) The specific allergens causing allergies in non-farm adults doesn't help evaluate whether childhood farm exposure improves immune function generally. The argument isn't about specific allergens but about overall immune system development.
User avatar
NEYR0N
Joined: 12 Feb 2025
Last visit: 27 Jan 2026
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Posts: 92
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray ,

The doctor’s argument is specifically about how childhood exposure to microorganisms improves immune function. Therefore, evidence about the lifestyles of children on farms—like in option C—is most directly relevant because it addresses potential confounding factors (other lifestyle differences) that might also influence immune system function.
Options D and E, while dealing with allergic outcomes, focus on adults rather than children. Can we immediately cross off answers such as D,E without analysing their content (considering them as "out of scope") ?


MartyMurray
Quote:
­Doctor: People who have grown up on farms and have been frequently exposed to germs from farm animals are much less likely to develop allergies than are people who were raised in more sanitary environments. This suggests that childhood exposure to certain microorganisms improves the function of the immune system.

The doctor concludes the following:

childhood exposure to certain microorganisms improves the function of the immune system

The support for that conclusion basically that there is a correlation between "frequently exposed to germs" and "less likely to develop allergies."

So, the doctor has seen a correlation and concluded that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to germs and improved functioning of the immune system.

In order to assess the strength of the doctor’s argument, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

The correct answer will be the one that presents a question such that different answers to the question weaken or strengthen the case for the conclusion.

A. Whether farm animals exposed to microorganisms can develop allergies as a result

The fact that this choice is about "farm animals" whereas the argument appears to be about the human immune system is a clue sign this choice probably isn't correct.

When we analyze this choice, we see that, indeed, neither a yes answer nor a no answer to the question presented by this choice affects the argument.

After all, we're seeking to determine whether exposure to microorganisms improves immune system function. Even if, in some cases, exposure to microorganisms can cause animals to develop allergies, it could still be the case that, in general, exposure to microorganisms improves immune system function.

Eliminate.

B. To which species of microorganisms children who grow up on farms are most often exposed

Different answers to this question do not affect the strength of the argument. After all, information on which species of microorganisms the children are exposed to doesn't by itself indicate whether exposure to those organisms improves the functioning of the immune system.

Eliminate.

C. How the lifestyles of children on farms tend to be distinctive in other ways known to affect the function of the immune system

The answer to this question helps us to evaluate the argument.

After all, if the answer to this question is that there are other aspects of the lifestyles of children on farms that could cause them to have better functioning immune systems, then maybe they are less likely to develop allergies because of those other aspects rather than because of exposure to germs.

On the other hand, if the answer is that there are not other aspects of the lifestyles of children on farms that could cause them to have better functioning immune systems, then we can be more confident that exposure to germs is what's making the difference.

So, different answers to this question can weaken or strengthen the argument.

Keep.

D. Whether adults who work with farm animals are less likely to develop allergies than adults from similar backgrounds who work in sanitary environments

The answer to this question doesn't affect the strength of the argument. After all, we already know that exposure to microorganisms from farm animals is correlated with being less likely to develop allergies. So, information that the same pattern holds for adults would not strengthen the argument.

The conclusion is about why that pattern holds, not about whether that pattern holds. More information on whether that pattern holds does not tell us why it does.

Eliminate.

E. Whether most of the allergies suffered by adults who did not grow up on farms are caused by allergens found on farms­

This choice mentions alleriges, farms, and allergens found on farms to create confusion and seem correct.

After all, we might get the impression that, if the answer to this question is "No, and most of the allergies suffered by adults who did not grow up on farms are not caused by allergens found on farms, then perhaps what's really going on is that people who grow up on farms and people who don't have different likelihoods of developing allergies because they are exposed to different allergens.

One reason we don't choose this choice is that we don't have information indicating that different allergens have different likelihoods of causing allergies. So, even if the people in the two groups are exposed to different sets of allergens, the information we have doesn't indicate that that difference would affect the functioning of their immune systems one way or another.

Furthermore, the answer to this choice doesn't give us a solid basis for comparison of people who grow up on farms and people who don't. After all, the answer to this question would not tell us whether people most of the allergies suffered by people who did grow up on farms are caused by allergens found on farms. So, we don't know from the answer to this question whether there is any difference between the allergens that cause the allergies suffered by people in the two groups.

So, the answer to this question neither weakens nor strengthens the argument.

Eliminate.

Correct answer:
User avatar
rushimehta
Joined: 28 Sep 2023
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GPA: 3.78
Posts: 52
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DerekLin
­Doctor: People who have grown up on farms and have been frequently exposed to germs from farm animals are much less likely to develop allergies than are people who were raised in more sanitary environments. This suggests that childhood exposure to certain microorganisms improves the function of the immune system.

In order to assess the strength of the doctor’s argument, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

A. Whether farm animals exposed to microorganisms can develop allergies as a result
B. To which species of microorganisms children who grow up on farms are most often exposed
C. How the lifestyles of children on farms tend to be distinctive in other ways known to affect the function of the immune system
D. Whether adults who work with farm animals are less likely to develop allergies than adults from similar backgrounds who work in sanitary environments
E. Whether most of the allergies suffered by adults who did not grow up on farms are caused by allergens found on farms­

Doctor's conclusion --> "People with childhood exposure to certain microorganisms --> improved function of the immune system".

Elimination of options -

A. Whether farm animals exposed to microorganisms can develop allergies as a result
  • Not talking about the correct conclusion... the conclusion is about "people" and not "farm animals".
B. To which species of microorganisms children who grow up on farms are most often exposed
  • Again irrelevant - we are talking about the impact, exposure to microorganisms will have on the immune system...
  • By just knowing the microbes to which children are most exposed, we won't be able to know whether that will improve the immune system or not ...
C. How the lifestyles of children on farms tend to be distinctive in other ways known to affect the function of the immune system
  • CORRECT - If we get the answer to this question, we might know whether there are any different reasons, which may impact the function of immune system of children on farms.
D. Whether adults who work with farm animals are less likely to develop allergies than adults from similar backgrounds who work in sanitary environments
  • This choice talks about "adults"...
  • Also, even if we get an answer to this question - it will just let us know whether adults who work with farm animals are less likely OR not less likely to develop allergies than adults from similar backgrounds who work in sanitary environments... It won't help us determine whether the CHILDHOOD exposure to microorganisms are the reason for improved function of immune system
E. Whether most of the allergies suffered by adults who did not grow up on farms are caused by allergens found on farms­
  • The conclusion is focused on "microorganisms", and not on "allergens"
  • the answer to this choice doesn't give us basis for comparison of people who grow up on farms and people who don't
  • The option is too specific - in the argument, we are talking about "immune system" in the conclusion. Whereas, this answer choice speaks about "allergens found on farms".
User avatar
Vasavan
Joined: 10 May 2023
Last visit: 15 Apr 2026
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
Schools: ISB '26 IIM
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
GPA: 10
WE:Programming (Technology)
Schools: ISB '26 IIM
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
Posts: 140
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi MartyMurray,

I am still not convinced how C is the answer. The argument says that the exposure improves the function of immune system. But what option C says how lifestyles that are distinct in ways that affect the function of the immune system.
The problem I had with this option was whether the lifestyles are distinct or not and contribute to the immune system, it doesn't change the fact that more exposure to micro-organisms can still improve the function of the immune system.
Can you let me know why this line of reasoning might be wrong?

Thanks in advance
MartyMurray
­Doctor: People who have grown up on farms and have been frequently exposed to germs from farm animals are much less likely to develop allergies than are people who were raised in more sanitary environments. This suggests that childhood exposure to certain microorganisms improves the function of the immune system.

The doctor concludes the following:

childhood exposure to certain microorganisms improves the function of the immune system

The support for that conclusion basically that there is a correlation between "frequently exposed to germs" and "less likely to develop allergies."

So, the doctor has seen a correlation and concluded that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to germs and improved functioning of the immune system.

In order to assess the strength of the doctor’s argument, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

The correct answer will be the one that presents a question such that different answers to the question weaken or strengthen the case for the conclusion.

A. Whether farm animals exposed to microorganisms can develop allergies as a result

The fact that this choice is about "farm animals" whereas the argument appears to be about the human immune system is a clue sign this choice probably isn't correct.

When we analyze this choice, we see that, indeed, neither a yes answer nor a no answer to the question presented by this choice affects the argument.

After all, we're seeking to determine whether exposure to microorganisms improves immune system function. Even if, in some cases, exposure to microorganisms can cause animals to develop allergies, it could still be the case that, in general, exposure to microorganisms improves immune system function.

Eliminate.

B. To which species of microorganisms children who grow up on farms are most often exposed

Different answers to this question do not affect the strength of the argument. After all, information on which species of microorganisms the children are exposed to doesn't by itself indicate whether exposure to those organisms improves the functioning of the immune system.

Eliminate.

C. How the lifestyles of children on farms tend to be distinctive in other ways known to affect the function of the immune system

The answer to this question helps us to evaluate the argument.

After all, if the answer to this question is that there are other aspects of the lifestyles of children on farms that could cause them to have better functioning immune systems, then maybe they are less likely to develop allergies because of those other aspects rather than because of exposure to germs.

On the other hand, if the answer is that there are not other aspects of the lifestyles of children on farms that could cause them to have better functioning immune systems, then we can be more confident that exposure to germs is what's making the difference.

So, different answers to this question can weaken or strengthen the argument.

Keep.

D. Whether adults who work with farm animals are less likely to develop allergies than adults from similar backgrounds who work in sanitary environments

The answer to this question doesn't affect the strength of the argument. After all, we already know that exposure to microorganisms from farm animals is correlated with being less likely to develop allergies. So, information that the same pattern holds for adults would not strengthen the argument.

The conclusion is about why that pattern holds, not about whether that pattern holds. More information on whether that pattern holds does not tell us why it does.

Eliminate.

E. Whether most of the allergies suffered by adults who did not grow up on farms are caused by allergens found on farms­

This choice mentions alleriges, farms, and allergens found on farms to create confusion and seem correct.

After all, we might get the impression that, if the answer to this question is "No, and most of the allergies suffered by adults who did not grow up on farms are not caused by allergens found on farms, then perhaps what's really going on is that people who grow up on farms and people who don't have different likelihoods of developing allergies because they are exposed to different allergens.

One reason we don't choose this choice is that we don't have information indicating that different allergens have different likelihoods of causing allergies. So, even if the people in the two groups are exposed to different sets of allergens, the information we have doesn't indicate that that difference would affect the functioning of their immune systems one way or another.

Furthermore, the answer to this choice doesn't give us a solid basis for comparison of people who grow up on farms and people who don't. After all, the answer to this question would not tell us whether people most of the allergies suffered by people who did grow up on farms are caused by allergens found on farms. So, we don't know from the answer to this question whether there is any difference between the allergens that cause the allergies suffered by people in the two groups.

So, the answer to this question neither weakens nor strengthens the argument.

Eliminate.

Correct answer:
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts