The extent to which a society is really free can be gauged by its

Question

The extent to which a society is really free can be gauged by its attitude toward artistic expression. Freedom of expression can easily be violated in even the most outwardly democratic of societies. When a government arts council withholds funding from a dance performance that its members deem "obscene," the voices of a few bureaucrats have in fact censored the work of the choreographer, thereby committing the real obscenity of repression.

Which of the following, if true, would most, seriously weaken the argument above?

A. Members of government arts councils are screened to ensure that their beliefs reflect those of the majority.

B. The term obscenity has several different definitions that should not be used interchangeably for rhetorical effect.

C. Failing to provide financial support for a performance is not the same as actively preventing or inhibiting it.

D. The council's decision could be reversed if the performance were altered to conform to public standards of appropriateness.

E. The definition of obscenity is something on which most members of a society can agree.

This is a  CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects: 
 
   Data Sufficiency Butler 
   Problem Solving Butler  
   Sentence Correction Butler  
   Reading Comprehension Butler  
   Integrated Reasoning Butler

Rucha.Shukla · Answer

IMO C

C. Failing to provide financial support for a performance is not the same as actively preventing or inhibiting it.

Posted from my mobile device

Michelle777 · Answer

How is it C could you pls explain?

Shwarma · Answer

Michelle777

My understanding
Conclusion: not funding the dancers is a form of repression and shows that society is not free since the artists are not free for their expression.

Weaken 
A new premise that says - the action that was taken was NOT repressing artistic expression.

A- kinda strengthens tbh
B- Irrelevant
D- strengthens
E- irrelevant

Bunuel · Answer

KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:

C

The author equates the withholding of government funding with censorship. (C), which denies that they're the same thing, destroys the argument. (A) is irrelevant That the council's actions may reflect majority opinion wouldn't justify what the author considers censorship-her definition isn't dependent on what most people think. (B) complains that the term  obscenity  is used ambiguously, but it's the term  censorship  that's the problem here. (D) misses the whole point; in the author's view, denial of funding amounts to censorship, and (D) simply reaffirms this. And (E), like (A), points to majority opinion, but since the author never denies that most people can agree on whafs obscene, this is beside the point.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

The extent to which a society is really free can be gauged by its

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

The extent to which a society is really free can be gauged by its

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards