Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
02 Jul 2024, 22:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
38% (01:43) correct
62%
(01:56)
wrong
based on 154
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Environmentalists argue that the recent decline in the population of the Pacific salmon is primarily due to the increase in water pollution levels in the rivers where the salmon spawn. They claim that pollutants have created an environment that is hostile to the salmon, preventing them from reproducing successfully. Therefore, they assert that reducing water pollution will lead to a recovery in the salmon population.Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A) There are no other significant factors contributing to the decline in the Pacific salmon population.
B) The level of water pollution in the rivers where the salmon spawn has increased significantly in recent years.
C) The salmon population has declined in all rivers where they spawn, not just in those with increased pollution levels.
D) Reducing water pollution in the rivers where salmon spawn will not have any adverse effects on other species of fish.
E) The pollutants in the rivers are directly harmful to the reproductive processes of the Pacific salmon.
A) There are no other significant factors contributing to the decline in the Pacific salmon population.
B) The level of water pollution in the rivers where the salmon spawn has increased significantly in recent years.
C) The salmon population has declined in all rivers where they spawn, not just in those with increased pollution levels.
D) Reducing water pollution in the rivers where salmon spawn will not have any adverse effects on other species of fish.
E) The pollutants in the rivers are directly harmful to the reproductive processes of the Pacific salmon.
05 Jul 2024, 10:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
This question needs some revision, or at least its answer needs to be changed. First, an Assumption question shouldn't be about choosing the most important assumption. Only one answer should correctly represent an assumption. In this case, A definitely is an assumption, so it must be correct unless it is rewritten. (If there are other significant threats, then it's doubtful that simply reversing this one threat will cause a recovery in the salmon population.
As for E, it isn't really an assumption. We can't be expected to know whether a cause is direct in order for removing it to reverse the problem. Let's look at a very simple but indirect way that pollutants might cause a "hostile environment." What if for some reason pollutants attract sharks, who then eat the salmon, this preventing them from reproducing? Then if we reduce pollution levels, the problem might well be reversed and salmon populations could recover. The argument doesn't rely on pollution directly affecting salmon at all, let alone specifically targeting their reproductive systems.
As for E, it isn't really an assumption. We can't be expected to know whether a cause is direct in order for removing it to reverse the problem. Let's look at a very simple but indirect way that pollutants might cause a "hostile environment." What if for some reason pollutants attract sharks, who then eat the salmon, this preventing them from reproducing? Then if we reduce pollution levels, the problem might well be reversed and salmon populations could recover. The argument doesn't rely on pollution directly affecting salmon at all, let alone specifically targeting their reproductive systems.
General Discussion
02 Jul 2024, 22:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
To identify the assumption, we need to find the unstated premise that the argument relies on. The argument claims that water pollution is the primary cause of the decline in the salmon population and that reducing pollution will lead to a recovery.
A) There are no other significant factors contributing to the decline in the Pacific salmon population.
This is a strong contender because if other significant factors are contributing to the decline, addressing only water pollution might not lead to a recovery in the salmon population.
B) The level of water pollution in the rivers where the salmon spawn has increased significantly in recent years.
While this might support the argument, it is not an assumption the argument depends on. The argument could still hold if pollution levels were always high.
C) The salmon population has declined in all rivers where they spawn, not just in those with increased pollution levels.
This weakens the argument rather than supports it because it suggests factors other than pollution could be responsible for the decline.
D) Reducing water pollution in the rivers where salmon spawn will not have any adverse effects on other species of fish.
This is irrelevant to the argument about the salmon population recovery.
E) The pollutants in the rivers are directly harmful to the reproductive processes of the Pacific salmon.
This is essential to the argument. If the pollutants are not directly harmful, reducing pollution might not lead to a recovery in the salmon population.
The correct answer is:
E) The pollutants in the rivers are directly harmful to the reproductive processes of the Pacific salmon.
A) There are no other significant factors contributing to the decline in the Pacific salmon population.
This is a strong contender because if other significant factors are contributing to the decline, addressing only water pollution might not lead to a recovery in the salmon population.
B) The level of water pollution in the rivers where the salmon spawn has increased significantly in recent years.
While this might support the argument, it is not an assumption the argument depends on. The argument could still hold if pollution levels were always high.
C) The salmon population has declined in all rivers where they spawn, not just in those with increased pollution levels.
This weakens the argument rather than supports it because it suggests factors other than pollution could be responsible for the decline.
D) Reducing water pollution in the rivers where salmon spawn will not have any adverse effects on other species of fish.
This is irrelevant to the argument about the salmon population recovery.
E) The pollutants in the rivers are directly harmful to the reproductive processes of the Pacific salmon.
This is essential to the argument. If the pollutants are not directly harmful, reducing pollution might not lead to a recovery in the salmon population.
The correct answer is:
E) The pollutants in the rivers are directly harmful to the reproductive processes of the Pacific salmon.
