Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
51% (01:43) correct
49%
(02:02)
wrong
based on 185
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
People who regularly use sunscreen are more likely to be diagnosed with melanoma skin cancer than are people who do not use sunscreen. Therefore, the use of sunscreen is a cause of melanoma.
The questionable pattern of reasoning above is most similar to which of the following?
A. Some non-smokers suffer from emphysema. Therefore, smoking is not a cause of emphysema.
B. Water-resistant sunscreen is more likely to be used by athletes playing outdoor sports in hot weather conditions than by members of the general public. Consequently, most buyers of water-resistant sunscreen are athletes.
C. Because some individuals are genetically inclined to obesity and obesity can result in type 2 diabetes, any individual who is genetically inclined to obesity will inevitably suffer from type 2 diabetes.
D. Reliance on blood pressure medication increases the risk of a heart attack, because those who take such medication are more likely to suffer a heart attack than are those who do not.
E. Melanoma skin cancer can be caused by Ultraviolet A radiation. Therefore, melanoma skin cancer cannot be caused by Ultraviolet B radiation.
The questionable pattern of reasoning above is most similar to which of the following?
A. Some non-smokers suffer from emphysema. Therefore, smoking is not a cause of emphysema.
B. Water-resistant sunscreen is more likely to be used by athletes playing outdoor sports in hot weather conditions than by members of the general public. Consequently, most buyers of water-resistant sunscreen are athletes.
C. Because some individuals are genetically inclined to obesity and obesity can result in type 2 diabetes, any individual who is genetically inclined to obesity will inevitably suffer from type 2 diabetes.
D. Reliance on blood pressure medication increases the risk of a heart attack, because those who take such medication are more likely to suffer a heart attack than are those who do not.
E. Melanoma skin cancer can be caused by Ultraviolet A radiation. Therefore, melanoma skin cancer cannot be caused by Ultraviolet B radiation.
23 Jul 2024, 20:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
The argument is a correlation=causation fallacy that fails to consider a third factor:
Essentially 'A is correlated with B, therefore A causes B'
A. Some non-smokers suffer from emphysema. Therefore, smoking is not a cause of emphysema
The fallacy here is more along the lines of assuming that because smoking is not always the cause of emphysema, it cannot be A cause of emphysema. Not similar to the argument in the question stem.
B. Water-resistant sunscreen is more likely to be used by athletes playing outdoor sports in hot weather conditions than by members of the general public. Consequently, most buyers of water-resistant sunscreen are athletes.
The fallacy in this one is more along the lines of 'A greater proportion of one group (which has an unknown size) exhibit some behavior than another group (again with an unknown size), therefore most of the people who exhibit this behavior are in group A. This fails to take into account the sizes of the populations. A fallacy, but again not similar to the argument.
C. Because some individuals are genetically inclined to obesity and obesity can result in type 2 diabetes, any individual who is genetically inclined to obesity will inevitably suffer from type 2 diabetes.
The fallacy here is assuming that because X CAN lead to Y, X WILL lead to Y. Not similar to the argument in question.
D. Reliance on blood pressure medication increases the risk of a heart attack, because those who take such medication are more likely to suffer a heart attack than are those who do not.
The fallacy here is concluding that blood pressure causes an increased risk of heart attack, because people who take blood pressure meds are more likely to have heart attacks than are those who do not. This is pointing out a correlation, and claiming one factor causes another while conveniently ignoring other factors which may be causing both, or the fact that they have the causal relationship backwards
D is the correct answer.
E. Melanoma skin cancer can be caused by Ultraviolet A radiation. Therefore, melanoma skin cancer cannot be caused by Ultraviolet B radiation.
This is kind of similar to option C, the fallacy is assuming that because A causes skin cancer, something else CANNOT ALSO cause skin cancer. Unrelated to the argument in the question
Essentially 'A is correlated with B, therefore A causes B'
A. Some non-smokers suffer from emphysema. Therefore, smoking is not a cause of emphysema
The fallacy here is more along the lines of assuming that because smoking is not always the cause of emphysema, it cannot be A cause of emphysema. Not similar to the argument in the question stem.
B. Water-resistant sunscreen is more likely to be used by athletes playing outdoor sports in hot weather conditions than by members of the general public. Consequently, most buyers of water-resistant sunscreen are athletes.
The fallacy in this one is more along the lines of 'A greater proportion of one group (which has an unknown size) exhibit some behavior than another group (again with an unknown size), therefore most of the people who exhibit this behavior are in group A. This fails to take into account the sizes of the populations. A fallacy, but again not similar to the argument.
C. Because some individuals are genetically inclined to obesity and obesity can result in type 2 diabetes, any individual who is genetically inclined to obesity will inevitably suffer from type 2 diabetes.
The fallacy here is assuming that because X CAN lead to Y, X WILL lead to Y. Not similar to the argument in question.
D. Reliance on blood pressure medication increases the risk of a heart attack, because those who take such medication are more likely to suffer a heart attack than are those who do not.
The fallacy here is concluding that blood pressure causes an increased risk of heart attack, because people who take blood pressure meds are more likely to have heart attacks than are those who do not. This is pointing out a correlation, and claiming one factor causes another while conveniently ignoring other factors which may be causing both, or the fact that they have the causal relationship backwards
D is the correct answer.
E. Melanoma skin cancer can be caused by Ultraviolet A radiation. Therefore, melanoma skin cancer cannot be caused by Ultraviolet B radiation.
This is kind of similar to option C, the fallacy is assuming that because A causes skin cancer, something else CANNOT ALSO cause skin cancer. Unrelated to the argument in the question
25 Sep 2025, 22:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
