Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 14:23 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 14:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
811,067
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,067
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 853
Own Kudos:
912
 [1]
Given Kudos: 251
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
Posts: 853
Kudos: 912
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Matthyrou
Joined: 16 Jun 2024
Last visit: 21 Dec 2024
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Location: France
Posts: 67
Kudos: 76
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 853
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 251
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
Posts: 853
Kudos: 912
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Matthyrou,

Sure. The core paradox is that, according to economic theory, when prices increase, demand should decrease. Veblen goods, however, behave in the opposite way: their demand increases with higher prices. The second bolded statement ("Therefore, as the price increases, the demand also increases...") resolves this paradox by clearly stating the counter-intuitive behavior of Veblen goods. It’s a concise restatement of the idea that this class of luxury goods does not follow the typical rule, and instead has its own unique market behavior.

While the preceding sentence to the second boldface explains why this happens (due to prestige), the second boldfaced statement ties it all together and serves as the final resolution by confirming the result of this behavior. It completes the explanation of how Veblen goods violate the general rule in the first boldfaced statement.

The marker word "Therefore,......." indicates a conclusion follows.

The prior sentence about prestige provides the why, but the second bolded statement provides the what—the final conclusion about Veblen goods' behavior in the marketplace.

I hope this helps.



Matthyrou
Hey, is it possible to have have more details for the second boldface, for it's a supporting conlusing supporting the first sentence and concluing the sentence just before the second boldface.

Krunaal
(A) Incorrect. The first bolded portion isn't evidence but a general economic rule. The second bolded portion isn't really the main conclusion but the description of how Veblen goods defy that rule.

(B) Incorrect. The author does not oppose the first statement. It is a general rule in economics that is true for most goods. The author is simply presenting an exception with Veblen goods.

(C) Incorrect. The first is a general rule, not a prediction. The second bolded part is not providing evidence but describing how Veblen goods behave differently.

(D) Correct. The first statement is a general rule of economics, and Veblen goods appear to violate this rule, creating a seeming paradox. The second statement resolves this by explaining how Veblen goods behave differently.

(E) Incorrect. There is no irony in the first statement. It's a factual rule of economics for most goods, not a hypothetical or ironic scenario.

Answer D.
User avatar
Matthyrou
Joined: 16 Jun 2024
Last visit: 21 Dec 2024
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Location: France
Posts: 67
Kudos: 76
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thank's mate, that's really clear and confirm my thoughts
Krunaal
Hi Matthyrou,

Sure. The core paradox is that, according to economic theory, when prices increase, demand should decrease. Veblen goods, however, behave in the opposite way: their demand increases with higher prices. The second bolded statement ("Therefore, as the price increases, the demand also increases...") resolves this paradox by clearly stating the counter-intuitive behavior of Veblen goods. It’s a concise restatement of the idea that this class of luxury goods does not follow the typical rule, and instead has its own unique market behavior.

While the preceding sentence to the second boldface explains why this happens (due to prestige), the second boldfaced statement ties it all together and serves as the final resolution by confirming the result of this behavior. It completes the explanation of how Veblen goods violate the general rule in the first boldfaced statement.

The marker word "Therefore,......." indicates a conclusion follows.

The prior sentence about prestige provides the why, but the second bolded statement provides the what—the final conclusion about Veblen goods' behavior in the marketplace.

I hope this helps.



Matthyrou
Hey, is it possible to have have more details for the second boldface, for it's a supporting conlusing supporting the first sentence and concluing the sentence just before the second boldface.

Krunaal
(A) Incorrect. The first bolded portion isn't evidence but a general economic rule. The second bolded portion isn't really the main conclusion but the description of how Veblen goods defy that rule.

(B) Incorrect. The author does not oppose the first statement. It is a general rule in economics that is true for most goods. The author is simply presenting an exception with Veblen goods.

(C) Incorrect. The first is a general rule, not a prediction. The second bolded part is not providing evidence but describing how Veblen goods behave differently.

(D) Correct. The first statement is a general rule of economics, and Veblen goods appear to violate this rule, creating a seeming paradox. The second statement resolves this by explaining how Veblen goods behave differently.

(E) Incorrect. There is no irony in the first statement. It's a factual rule of economics for most goods, not a hypothetical or ironic scenario.

Answer D.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,067
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
In economics, a "Veblen good" is an item which people buy in greater quantity when the price goes up. According to the Law of Supply and Demand, when the price of an ordinary item goes up, demand drops, i.e. people buy fewer of them. A Veblen good is a luxury item to which status is attached, such as a designer outfit or luxury car. As the price of such an item increases, its prestige increases, which makes the item that much more desirable. Therefore, as the price increases, the demand also increases, and more of these items are sold.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
B. The first is a view that the author opposes; the second is the main conclusion.
C. The first is a prediction; the second gives evidence of for this prediction.
D. The first is a general rule, the violation of which seems to indicate a paradox; the second is the resolution of that apparent paradox.
E. The first is an ironic description of what could happen in the marketplace; the second is a more realistic description of what actually happens.


­


Official Explanation



The first bold statement is the Law of Supply and Demand, one of the most fundamental and far-reaching laws in all of economics. A Veblen good is a rare example of a commodity that does not follow the Law of Supply and Demand in an ordinary way. The second bold statement makes this clear: the Veblen goods are following a pattern different from the standard application of the Law of Supply and Demand.

Notice that the two bold statements are odd with each other: on the surface, there's a contradiction, and we need the complete text of the argument to resolve this contradiction.

(D) is the credited answer. The first statement, the Law of Supply and Demand, is differently a general rule, a widely observed pattern in markets throughout the world. The Veblen good doesn't obey this rule, so that's paradoxical. The sentences between the bold statements explain what is unique to the economy of a Veblen good, and the final sentence completes that explanation ---- i.e. it resolves the apparent paradox.

(A) is wrong. First of all, the Law of Supply and Demand is not really a piece of evidence. Furthermore, there's a contradiction between this law and how a Veblen good works, so the first bold statement does not support the second.

(B) is wrong. No author in her right mind would oppose the Law of Supply and Demand.

(C) is wrong. First of all, the Law of Supply and Demand is not merely a prediction. Furthermore, there's a contradiction between the two bold statements; one is not evidence for the other.

(E) is wrong. There is absolutely nothing ironic and nothing hypothetical about the fundamental statement of the Law of Supply and Demand --- it's purely factual and objective. Furthermore, the second statement, about Veblen goods, describes a small category of specialty items, and does not apply to the market in general.
User avatar
DeepanshuPandey
Joined: 14 Sep 2023
Last visit: 13 Apr 2026
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 15
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
INCORRECT. The first part is not a piece of evidence, it's a general rule

B. The first is a view that the author opposes; the second is the main conclusion.

INCORRECT. The author does not oppose the first view.

C. The first is a prediction; the second gives evidence of for this prediction.

INCORRECT. The first part is a general rule

D. The first is a general rule, the violation of which seems to indicate a paradox; the second is the resolution of that apparent paradox.

CORRECT

E. The first is an ironic description of what could happen in the marketplace; the second is a more realistic description of what actually happens.

INCORRECT. The first part is a general rule
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts