Answer: (A) Most people who eat a high-fat diet experience health issues, so if Mark adopts a high-fat diet, he is guaranteed to develop health problems.
Explanation:
Flaw in the Passage Argument:
The passage commits a generalization fallacy by assuming that since most cities of over one million people experience air quality issues, all cities of this size (specifically Metropolis City) will inevitably face similar problems unless stricter emissions standards are implemented. It extrapolates a general observation about many cities to a guaranteed outcome for one particular city.
Analysis of Answer Choices:
• (A):Most people who eat a high-fat diet experience health issues, so if Mark adopts a high-fat diet, he is guaranteed to develop health problems.
• Correct. This mirrors the same flawed reasoning: it takes a general observation (most people who eat a high-fat diet have health issues) and improperly concludes that this outcome must apply to Mark without accounting for individual variation.
• (B):A majority of students who score high on standardized tests also excel in mathematics. Since Jane excels in mathematics, she must have scored high on standardized tests.
• Incorrect. This argument contains a flaw of reversing causation or misinterpreting correlation but does not involve generalizing from most to all, as in the original argument.
• (C):A study finds that areas with high crime rates tend to have a strong police presence. Since the central district of Gotham has a high police presence, its crime rate must also be high.
• Incorrect. This argument assumes a causal relationship between police presence and crime rate, but it does not overgeneralize from “most” to “all.”
• (D):All athletes who train consistently improve their performance. Since Sarah is an athlete, her performance will improve if she begins training consistently.
• Incorrect. This statement is logically valid based on the given premise and does not commit the same fallacy of overgeneralization.
• (E):A nationwide survey shows that neighborhoods with more streetlights have lower crime rates. Therefore, installing additional streetlights will definitely reduce crime in every neighborhood.
• Incorrect. This argument assumes causation but does not overgeneralize from “most” to “all.” Instead, it makes an unwarranted assumption about the effectiveness of streetlights.
Conclusion:
The correct answer is (A) because it commits the same fallacy of assuming that what is true for most must necessarily be true for all, mirroring the flawed reasoning in the original argument.