Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion?
A.
Import bans can provide domestic producers the time they need to bring to market products they otherwise would not have the financial resources to develop. Suitable This damages the conclusion most. As there is actually some domestic advantage to banning of imports. It will help domestic producers bring the equivalent products to markets, which further help domestic consumers by conserving the domestic forex reserve.
B. Import bans on certain products often cause other countries, whose companies manufacture those products, to enact their own import bans.
Eliminated This only indicates at counter bans by external countries, which in a way strengthens the conclusion as domestic exports may be hurt.
C. A country's economic strength is more important to its survival than the availability of choice to its consumers.
Eliminated This does nothing to the conclusion
D. When there is not a significant price difference, consumers tend to choose the products of domestic producers over those of foreign producers.
Eliminated This weakens the conclusion. As it shows that there is no effect whatsoever on instituting such ban.
E. Bans and tariffs on imports can have unpredictable effects on currency exchange-rates.
Eliminated This renders the effect of bans inconclusive.