Three years ago, a sports association announced its concern that an in

Question

Three years ago, a sports association announced its concern that an increase in the popularity of computer games would lead to a drop in the amount of time that children spent playing tennis. Clearly this prediction was inaccurate since a survey about kids activities at schools shows that many children who are spending more time playing computer games than before have not cut down on their tennis.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

A. Whether there is evidence of other sports or physical activities not being affected by the increased popularity of computer games

B. Whether the children that participated in the survey would testify to the same behavior after school hours

C. Whether sports associations are interested in the well-being of children or simply see them for their value as budding consumers

D. Whether there is any support for the suggestion of a direct relation between computer games and violence in children

E. Whether there were similar surveys that were conducted on adults as well

This is a  CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects:

Data Sufficiency Butler  
  Problem Solving Butler  
  Reading Comprehension Butler  
  Data Insights Butler

bhargavhhhhhhhh · Answer

Correct Answer: B. Whether the children that participated in the survey would testify to the same behavior after school hours

The argument concludes that the sports association's prediction was inaccurate because a survey showed that many children who now spend more time on computer games have not reduced their tennis activity. However, the survey is based on school activities only. The flaw here is that school-time behavior may not reflect total behavior, especially since kids often play both video games and sports outside of school hours.

To evaluate this argument properly, we need to know whether the survey's findings about school-time tennis reflect what happens overall, particularly after school, when kids are more likely to play video games. If kids are playing more video games and still playing tennis at school but not doing so after school, the concern of the sports association may still be valid. Therefore, (B) directly tests whether the evidence used in the argument is representative.

Elimination:

A. "Whether there is evidence of other sports or physical activities not being affected by the increased popularity of computer games"
– This talks about other sports, but the argument is specifically about tennis. It’s irrelevant to the claim being tested.

C. "Whether sports associations are interested in the well-being of children or simply see them for their value as budding consumers"
– This is about the motivation of the association, not the accuracy of their prediction. Off-topic.

D. "Whether there is any support for the suggestion of a direct relation between computer games and violence in children"
– Completely unrelated. The argument is about time spent on tennis, not behavior or aggression.

E. "Whether there were similar surveys that were conducted on adults as well"
– The prediction and the evidence are about children. Adult surveys are irrelevant here.

Therefore, (B) is the only option that helps assess whether the argument's conclusion is based on a complete and representative set of data.

Dereno · Answer

The question says that THREE YEARS AGO sport's association raised a concern about the increasing computer games and their impact on children’s Tennis playing time.

They anticipated a decrease in children’s Tennis playing time. But, their predictions turned wrong- because during SCHOOL HOURS, the children who play more hours of computer games have not shown any signs of decrease in playing time.

Let’s look into answer choices. Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

A. Whether there is evidence of other sports or physical activities not being affected by the increased popularity of computer games

Question is based on tennis vs computer games. Not other physical sport or activities. Hence irrelevant.

B.  Whether the children that participated in the survey would testify to the same behavior after school hours

This is the answer choice, because the prediction was that computer games could decrease tennis playing time ( school and after school hours ). This would be helpful to evaluate the argument.

C. Whether sports associations are interested in the well-being of children or simply see them for their value as budding consumers

Out of scope.

D. Whether there is any support for the suggestion of a direct relation between computer games and violence in children

Violence is not debated here. Out of scope.

E. Whether there were similar surveys that were conducted on adults as well

Comparison is between school children’s gaming times. Adult is irrelevant. Hence out of scope.

Abhiswarup · Answer

The passage argues that tennis is still being played by children even after introduction of computer Games i.e. the prediction that computer games will result in drop in time for tennis is inaccurate.

Analyzing the options:
A. Whether there is evidence of other sports or physical activities not being affected by the increased popularity of computer games
Tennis is being talked about. Other sports are not point of concern. Eliminate
B. Whether the children that participated in the survey would testify to the same behavior after school hours
Seems correct whether the survey participants actually involved in playing computer games or tennis. Seems correct.
C. Whether sports associations are interested in the well-being of children or simply see them for their value as budding consumers
Irrelevant. Eliminate
D. Whether there is any support for the suggestion of a direct relation between computer games and violence in children
Irrelevant. Eliminate
E. Whether there were similar surveys that were conducted on adults as well
Out of scope. Eliminate

Correct answer is B.

Bunuel · Answer

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Three years ago, a sports association announced its concern that an increase in the popularity of computer games would lead to a drop in the amount of time that children spent playing tennis. Clearly this prediction was inaccurate since a survey about kids activities at schools shows that many children who are spending more time playing computer games than before have not cut down on their tennis.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

A. Whether there is evidence of other sports or physical activities not being affected by the increased popularity of computer games

Incorrect.

To solve this Investigation question, first break down the argument. The first sentence is factual, a premise although it contains an unsupported prediction within it. The last sentence uses the conclusion word Clearly letting us know that it's the conclusion, but it also gives us additional data (survey) meaning it holds another premise:

Premise A: there's a concern that computer games would cause children to play less tennis than they once did
 +
Premise B: a survey of kids activities at school shows that kids who are playing computer games more than before, are not playing less tennis
 = 
Conclusion: the sports association was wrong

Vital factor: ?

You are required to find the factor which is most crucial to the author's conclusion. The correct answer is an unknown factor which could support or weaken the conclusion depending on its outcome.

This answer choice introduces other sports or physical activities. Such sports or activities are irrelevant since the conclusion focuses on the sports association's prediction about tennis.

B. Whether the children that participated in the survey would testify to the same behavior after school hours

The question in this answer choice would tell us how relevant the survey is and, therefore, whether the author is correct or not. If the children's preferences are not the same after school, then it could be that they are playing far less tennis overall. If they maintain their choice of activities after school hours, then they are probably still playing the same amount of tennis even after computer games became popular.

C. Whether sports associations are interested in the well-being of children or simply see them for their value as budding consumers

Incorrect.

To solve this Investigation question, first break down the argument. The first sentence is factual, a premise although it contains an unsupported prediction within it. The last sentence uses the conclusion word Clearly letting us know that it's the conclusion, but it also gives us additional data (survey) meaning it holds another premise:

Premise A: there's a concern that computer games would cause children to play less tennis than they once did
 +
Premise B: a survey of kids activities at school shows that kids who are playing computer games more than before, are not playing less tennis
 = 
Conclusion: the sports association was wrong

Vital factor: ?

You are required to find the factor which is most crucial to the author's conclusion. The correct answer is an unknown factor which could support or weaken the conclusion depending on its outcome.

The question presented by this answer choice would not help us determine anything about whether the sports association's prediction was right. The intentions of the association are besides the point since the prediction was made about tennis and how much it's played.

D. Whether there is any support for the suggestion of a direct relation between computer games and violence in children

Incorrect.

This answer choice contains a topic that is beyond the scope of the argument - violence. The conclusion deals with the accuracy of the association's prediction about kids playing tennis. Therefore, data about violence would not directly help us in our task.

E. Whether there were similar surveys that were conducted on adults as well

Incorrect.

Answering the question put forward by this answer choice would not assist us in determining whether the author is right. Since the conclusion is about the association's prediction about kids, data about adults is irrelevant.

Three years ago, a sports association announced its concern that an in

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Three years ago, a sports association announced its concern that an in

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards