Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
29 Apr 2025, 01:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
46% (01:58) correct
54%
(01:57)
wrong
based on 170
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Researchers working in Western Australia have discovered the oldest fragments of the Earth's early crust that have yet been identified: microdiamonds. These microscopic crystals measure only 50 microns across and were formed 4.2 billion years ago. This discovery sheds light on how long it took for the Earth's crust to form, since this date is only 300 million years after the formation of the Earth itself.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?
(A) The Earth's crust took no longer than 300 million years to start to form.
(B) The Earth's crust first formed in the area that is now Western Australia.
(C) The Earth's crust took billions of years to form.
(D) Microdiamonds were the first components of the Earth's crust to form.
(E) All naturally occurring microdiamonds were formed at the time the Earth's crust was being formed.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?
(A) The Earth's crust took no longer than 300 million years to start to form.
(B) The Earth's crust first formed in the area that is now Western Australia.
(C) The Earth's crust took billions of years to form.
(D) Microdiamonds were the first components of the Earth's crust to form.
(E) All naturally occurring microdiamonds were formed at the time the Earth's crust was being formed.
14 May 2025, 06:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
Researchers working in Western Australia have discovered the oldest fragments of the Earth's early crust that have yet been identified: microdiamonds. These microscopic crystals measure only 50 microns across and were formed 4.2 billion years ago. This discovery sheds light on how long it took for the Earth's crust to form, since this date is only 300 million years after the formation of the Earth itself.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?
This is an Inference question, and the correct answer will be the choice that must be true given what the passage says.
(A) The Earth's crust took no longer than 300 million years to start to form.
This choice is interesting.
After all, the passage indicates that the microdiamonds are fragments of Earth's crust and were formed 4.2 billion years ago, which is only 300 million years after the formation of Earth itself. That information indicates that the crust also must have formed only 300 million years after the formation of Earth itself.
After all, if part of the Earth's crust was formed 300 million years after the formation of Earth, then the crust started to form then.
Also, the passage says the following:
This discovery sheds light on how long it took for the Earth's crust to form, since this date is only 300 million years after the formation of the Earth itself.
That statement indicates that we can safely presume that, by "how long it took for the Earth's crust to form," the passage and choice (A) mean "how long after the formation of Earth it took for Earth's crust to form," rather than how long after the universe formed or how long in some other way.
So, given what the passage says, we can decide that the correct answer is "The Earth's crust took no longer than 300 million years to start to form."
Keep.
(B) The Earth's crust first formed in the area that is now Western Australia.
The passage does not indicate the location at which the crust "first formed."
It indicates only that "the oldest fragments of the Earth's early crust that have yet been identified" were found in Western Australia.
The fact that the oldest fragments found were there does not mean that it "must be true" that the crust first formed there. After all, there could be older fragments elsewhere, or the fragments found there could have formed elsewhere and then somehow been transported to Western Australia.
Eliminate.
(C) The Earth's crust took billions of years to form.
To an extent, this choice contradicts what the passage says.
After all, if microdiamonds, parts of Earth's crust, were formed only 300 million years after Earth itself, then it appears that Earth's crust formed to at least some extent within 300 million years.
Furthermore, even if, given what the passage says, it may have taken over 300 million years for Earth's crust to form completely, there still is nothing in the passage that indicates that Earth's crust took "billions of years" to form.
Eliminate.
(D) Microdiamonds were the first components of the Earth's crust to form.
The passage does not indicate that microdiamonds were "the first components of the Earth's crust to form."
It indicates only that they are the oldest fragments of Earth's crust "that have yet been identified."
The fact that nothing older has been identified does not mean that it "must be true" that they were the first components of the Earth's crust to form.
There could be other components that have not been identified that formed before microdiamonds.
Eliminate.
(E) All naturally occurring microdiamonds were formed at the time the Earth's crust was being formed.
This choice is a little hard to eliminate because the passage says the following:
Researchers working in Western Australia have discovered the oldest fragments of the Earth's early crust that have yet been identified: microdiamonds.
That part of the passage seems to basically define microdiamonds as fragments of Earth's early crust.
So, to eliminate this choice, we have to make a judgment call and decide that the fact that microdiamonds can be fragments of Earth's early crust does not mean that all microdiamonds are fragments of Earth's early crust.
Honestly, this question could be a little better constructed since the above sentence from the passage does seem to indicate that microdiamonds are by definition parts of Earth's early crust. At the same time, since it's not clear that that's what the above sentence is meant to convey and since choice (A) is clearly supported by the passage, we can eliminate this choice and choose (A).
Eliminate.
Correct answer: A
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?
This is an Inference question, and the correct answer will be the choice that must be true given what the passage says.
(A) The Earth's crust took no longer than 300 million years to start to form.
This choice is interesting.
After all, the passage indicates that the microdiamonds are fragments of Earth's crust and were formed 4.2 billion years ago, which is only 300 million years after the formation of Earth itself. That information indicates that the crust also must have formed only 300 million years after the formation of Earth itself.
After all, if part of the Earth's crust was formed 300 million years after the formation of Earth, then the crust started to form then.
Also, the passage says the following:
This discovery sheds light on how long it took for the Earth's crust to form, since this date is only 300 million years after the formation of the Earth itself.
That statement indicates that we can safely presume that, by "how long it took for the Earth's crust to form," the passage and choice (A) mean "how long after the formation of Earth it took for Earth's crust to form," rather than how long after the universe formed or how long in some other way.
So, given what the passage says, we can decide that the correct answer is "The Earth's crust took no longer than 300 million years to start to form."
Keep.
(B) The Earth's crust first formed in the area that is now Western Australia.
The passage does not indicate the location at which the crust "first formed."
It indicates only that "the oldest fragments of the Earth's early crust that have yet been identified" were found in Western Australia.
The fact that the oldest fragments found were there does not mean that it "must be true" that the crust first formed there. After all, there could be older fragments elsewhere, or the fragments found there could have formed elsewhere and then somehow been transported to Western Australia.
Eliminate.
(C) The Earth's crust took billions of years to form.
To an extent, this choice contradicts what the passage says.
After all, if microdiamonds, parts of Earth's crust, were formed only 300 million years after Earth itself, then it appears that Earth's crust formed to at least some extent within 300 million years.
Furthermore, even if, given what the passage says, it may have taken over 300 million years for Earth's crust to form completely, there still is nothing in the passage that indicates that Earth's crust took "billions of years" to form.
Eliminate.
(D) Microdiamonds were the first components of the Earth's crust to form.
The passage does not indicate that microdiamonds were "the first components of the Earth's crust to form."
It indicates only that they are the oldest fragments of Earth's crust "that have yet been identified."
The fact that nothing older has been identified does not mean that it "must be true" that they were the first components of the Earth's crust to form.
There could be other components that have not been identified that formed before microdiamonds.
Eliminate.
(E) All naturally occurring microdiamonds were formed at the time the Earth's crust was being formed.
This choice is a little hard to eliminate because the passage says the following:
Researchers working in Western Australia have discovered the oldest fragments of the Earth's early crust that have yet been identified: microdiamonds.
That part of the passage seems to basically define microdiamonds as fragments of Earth's early crust.
So, to eliminate this choice, we have to make a judgment call and decide that the fact that microdiamonds can be fragments of Earth's early crust does not mean that all microdiamonds are fragments of Earth's early crust.
Honestly, this question could be a little better constructed since the above sentence from the passage does seem to indicate that microdiamonds are by definition parts of Earth's early crust. At the same time, since it's not clear that that's what the above sentence is meant to convey and since choice (A) is clearly supported by the passage, we can eliminate this choice and choose (A).
Eliminate.
Correct answer: A
Moderators:
