The stimulus gives us
two contrasting ideas:
1. Positive trend:• Home cinema equipment prices ↓ → More home installations
• Films accessible online → Boom in films watched internationally
2. The "However" twist:• Cheap methods exist for
ILLICIT (illegal/pirated) distribution
Key insight: The word
"illicit" is doing all the heavy lifting here. Illicit = piracy.
The Core Logic:Ask yourself:
When someone pirates a movie, who loses money?→ The people who own the
RIGHTS to that movie
→ The people earning
ROYALTIES from that movie
Therefore, investors should
avoid putting money into movie rights and royalties.
Answer: CWhy Wrong Answers Fail:(A) Tax documentation -
Out of scope. The passage says nothing about taxes.
(B) International marketing - This is about
how to invest, not
whether to invest. Piracy affects ALL films equally.
(D) Comparing genres - Same problem as (B). Piracy doesn't discriminate by genre.
(E) Avoiding equipment investments -
Here's why (E) is backwards:• The passage says equipment prices are
decreasing and
more people are installing home cinemas
• Equipment
SALES are booming• Pirates still need TVs, speakers, and equipment to watch stolen content!
• Hardware sellers
win regardless of piracy
Simple Test:• Piracy
HURTS: Movie studios, rights holders, royalty earners
• Piracy
DOESN'T HURT: Equipment manufacturers, hardware retailers
(C) correctly targets what piracy actually damages -
rights and royalties.