A. The success of a design firm is based completely on its staff since the product it provides is creativity itself.
Too broad and unrelated. It doesn’t follow directly from the comparison of age and creativity.
B. Designers after the age of 45 are usually in positions of management, and not in those requiring creative problem-solving.
Not supported by the data. The passage never mentions job roles or management.
C. Within the said age groups, older designers, thanks to their acquired experience and style, are more creative than younger designers.
Directly contradicts the survey result. The data says younger designers are more creative.
D. Designers with less than ten years of experience are more creative than designers with more than ten years of experience.
This paraphrases the given data. Designers aged 25–35 (likely <10 years of experience) outperform 35–50 (likely >10 years).
It directly fits the evidence and challenges firms’ preference for experience.
E. Design firms should be more open-minded when considering the employment of recently graduated designers.
This is a reasonable recommendation drawn from the data, not a restatement.
The passage says “this data clearly suggests that ___,” which fits better with a conclusion about what firms should do, not just a factual restatement.
Between D and E:
D restates the data (descriptive conclusion).
E draws the logical implication (“firms should rethink hiring bias”) — which fits the wording “this data clearly suggests that...” much better.