Bunuel
Four patients taking the sleeping pill SleepSoon, manufactured by DrugRite, died during a six-month period, yet the government health agency of Country X decided not to remove SleepSoon from the market. Many industry observers were surprised, since the death of so many patient staking a particular drug will often lead to the drug’s being removed from the market.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best indication that the government health agency’s decision was logically well supported?
A. In the previous two-year period, twelve patients taking SleepSoon died, while only two patients taking other sleeping pills died during the same time period.
B. The deaths of the patients taking SleepSoon were found to be unrelated to the sleeping pill SleepSoon.
C. The government health agency of Country X issued new guidelines for drug companies to help standardize the safety criteria that a drug must meet prior to being placed on the market.
D. Consumer groups lobbied for legislation requiring drugs to meet stricter safety standards before being placed on the market.
E. Many DrugRite employees left the company for jobs at other drug manufacturers
There is a medical pill SleepSoon (SS) manufactured by DrugRite, 4 patients died during the 6 month period. The government health agency X did not remove the drug from the market. This left the industry researchers to be surprised, as usually post death due to medication, might cause the drug manufactured to be out of market.
We need to find the logical reason behind the government’s decision.
A. In the previous two-year period, twelve patients taking SleepSoon died, while only two patients taking other sleeping pills died during the same time period.
This provides a comparison between the number of fatalities in the previous two year period due to SS drug intake vs the other sleeping pills. The number of fatalities has been high for the SS drug. This could have been a valid reason to stop this drug. But, the opposite has happened. Hence, wrong.
B. The deaths of the patients taking SleepSoon were found to be unrelated to the sleeping pill SleepSoon.This sounds more likely to be the answer. As, if the 4 deaths were not due to the drug SS, then the government decision of not banning the drug seems logical. Hence correct answer.
C. The government health agency of Country X issued new guidelines for drug companies to help standardize the safety criteria that a drug must meet prior to being placed on the market.
These are after effects of an event, the government health agency issuing new guidelines for the upcoming medicine launches. But, this doesn’t address the reason why government allowed SS to continue despite deaths.
D. Consumer groups lobbied for legislation requiring drugs to meet stricter safety standards before being placed on the market.
This is same as Option C, aftermath of any major incident. Hence, eliminating it.
E. Many DrugRite employees left the company for jobs at other drug manufacturers.
This option cannot be attributed or linked to government decision. Moreover, the change can be due to personal reasons, or moral responsibility etc. Hence, wrong.
Option B