Here's the Correct answer:
B. Long-term exposure to pollution results in asthma.
Why (B) is the assumption
The argument goes something like this:
Action taken: Set up temporary exhaust control points.
Observed outcome: An instant decrease in asthma cases.
Decision: The points for exhaust control will be permanent.
The city councils would, therefore, be assuming in their justification that the cause of asthma includes pollution so it will reduce in the future upon exhaust checks.
That's exactly what option (B) says.
Why the other options won't work
(A) One speaks of highways and uninhabitable outskirts, which are irrelevant to either asthma or pollution.
(C) Indicates that asthma symptoms are really flu; this would be a weakening argument.
D Refers to masks — irrelevant to the exhaust control points.
(E) Discusses company incentives — irrelevant to the health-based reasoning.
Carcass
This year, pollution levels, particularly in downtown areas, reached such alarming levels that city councils in several states established temporary exhaust control points on the highways feeding inner city areas. This led to an immediate drop in the number of people suffering from asthma. As a result, several councils have decided to make the exhaust control points a permanent feature.
The decision to make the exhaust control points a permanent feature on highways is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) All highways pass through the outskirts of downtown areas, which are uninhabitable areas.
(B) Prolonged exposure to pollution causes asthma.
(C) A variation of Asian flu prevalent in downtown areas has the same symptoms as acute asthma.
(D) A newly available mask does not reduce the risk of acquiring asthma from pollution.
(E) The company running the exhaust checks is paid according to the number of defective vehicles detected.