Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
05 Apr 2026, 19:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
81% (01:49) correct
19%
(01:50)
wrong
based on 78
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Professor Lebiski: The most basic human need is food. Before humans discovered that they could grow their own food, all they did was wander in the forests and forage for fruits and meat. With the evolution of grass, humans learned that certain plants, grown near water bodies, can be consumed as food. This provided them the incentive to spend their time cultivating these plants in one location rather than roaming around, hunting for food. This geographical stability must have gradually helped the evolution of agriculture and, with it, of civilization.
Professor Gomez: The core aspects of this evolution of civilization were climate and the availability of water for plants. It is, therefore, no surprise that all the early civilizations were near large rivers and in tropical areas.
Which one of the following most accurately characterizes Professor Gomez’s response to the argument furnished by Professor Lebiski?
A) Professor Gomez provides a counterargument that highlights a flaw in Professor Lebiski’s argument.
B) Professor Gomez builds on Professor Lebiski’s argument and provides additional evidence.
C) Professor Gomez discards Professor Lebiski’s argument on the basis of the examples provided.
D) Professor Gomez’s argument is incompatible with that of Professor Lebiski.
E) Professor Gomez repeats Professor Lebiski’s argument with little additional information.
Professor Gomez: The core aspects of this evolution of civilization were climate and the availability of water for plants. It is, therefore, no surprise that all the early civilizations were near large rivers and in tropical areas.
Which one of the following most accurately characterizes Professor Gomez’s response to the argument furnished by Professor Lebiski?
A) Professor Gomez provides a counterargument that highlights a flaw in Professor Lebiski’s argument.
B) Professor Gomez builds on Professor Lebiski’s argument and provides additional evidence.
C) Professor Gomez discards Professor Lebiski’s argument on the basis of the examples provided.
D) Professor Gomez’s argument is incompatible with that of Professor Lebiski.
E) Professor Gomez repeats Professor Lebiski’s argument with little additional information.
05 Apr 2026, 22:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
Clearly Professor Gomez is adding some more additional evidence adding onto the facts of Professor Lebiski, thus option B portrays the exact structure of the dialogue.
ExpertsGlobal5
06 Apr 2026, 13:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
with evolution pf grass, human figured out that they could grow plants by using water. so that geographical stability have gradually helped the evolution of agriculture and with it, of civilization.
the core aspects of this evolution were climate and availability of water. so thats why early civilization were near water and tropical area.
lebiski= grass evolution - growing plant near water - stability in one location- agriculture evolution.
gomez is adding new info into lebiskis view by adding that core aspects were climate and water availability.
evolution of civilization - near large rivers and tropical areas.
A gomez is not highlighting flaw though.
B yes, he is adding more to arguments.
C gomez is not discarding either.
D its not about incompatible or like that. they area trying to prove each other right or one is superior over other.
E he is not repeating with additional info.
the core aspects of this evolution were climate and availability of water. so thats why early civilization were near water and tropical area.
lebiski= grass evolution - growing plant near water - stability in one location- agriculture evolution.
gomez is adding new info into lebiskis view by adding that core aspects were climate and water availability.
evolution of civilization - near large rivers and tropical areas.
A gomez is not highlighting flaw though.
B yes, he is adding more to arguments.
C gomez is not discarding either.
D its not about incompatible or like that. they area trying to prove each other right or one is superior over other.
E he is not repeating with additional info.
ExpertsGlobal5
