Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0907:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway- Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0812:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Sep 1001:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
30 Apr 2026, 19:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
45% (02:10) correct
55%
(02:18)
wrong
based on 278
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The lawyer representing several boat owners in a class-action lawsuit argued that because there is no direct evidence that contact with the liquid exhaust produced by speedboats harms the chassis of sailboats that are well maintained, banning speedboats from the lake cannot be justified on the grounds of damaging private property.
Which criticism of the above argument, from among the following, is best?
A. It fails to consider that the chassis of sailboats can be damaged by factors other than the liquid exhaust from speedboats.
B. It fails to acknowledge that sailboats, even those that routinely come in contact with the liquid exhaust produced by speedboats, are generally better-maintained than speed boats are.
C. It does not consider the roles that material quality, design, and human error play in damage caused to a boat’s chassis.
D. It fails to take into account the possibility that the owners of well-maintained sailboats, who are made aware of the danger posed by the liquid exhaust produced by speedboats, may show greater concern regarding potential chassis damage to their sailboats.
E. It ignores how the liquid exhaust can damage the chassis of sailboats that are not well-maintained.
Which criticism of the above argument, from among the following, is best?
A. It fails to consider that the chassis of sailboats can be damaged by factors other than the liquid exhaust from speedboats.
B. It fails to acknowledge that sailboats, even those that routinely come in contact with the liquid exhaust produced by speedboats, are generally better-maintained than speed boats are.
C. It does not consider the roles that material quality, design, and human error play in damage caused to a boat’s chassis.
D. It fails to take into account the possibility that the owners of well-maintained sailboats, who are made aware of the danger posed by the liquid exhaust produced by speedboats, may show greater concern regarding potential chassis damage to their sailboats.
E. It ignores how the liquid exhaust can damage the chassis of sailboats that are not well-maintained.
30 Apr 2026, 23:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
lawyer is saying that there is no direct evidence that liquid exhaust produced by speedboats harms the chassis of sailboats that are well maintained.
conclusion- banning speedboats from lake cant be justified on the grounds of damaging private property.
A if thats the case then it make lawyers case more stronger. so reject.
B this is comparison about maintenance between speedboats and sailboats. reject.
C this talks about factors that has no impact on exhaust. so reject.
D so if owners were aware of such issue then they will make more efforts to avoid getting their sailboats damaged. so even when there is no such stuff happened they will create unnecessary arguments to prove their points. this somewhat favors the lawyer. so reject.
E so lawyer has mentioned only well maintained boats and jumped to conclusion based on that. but what if exhaust can damage not well maintained boats? then the generalization wont stand and weakens the lawyers conclusion. so this does enough to weaken the conclusion.
conclusion- banning speedboats from lake cant be justified on the grounds of damaging private property.
A if thats the case then it make lawyers case more stronger. so reject.
B this is comparison about maintenance between speedboats and sailboats. reject.
C this talks about factors that has no impact on exhaust. so reject.
D so if owners were aware of such issue then they will make more efforts to avoid getting their sailboats damaged. so even when there is no such stuff happened they will create unnecessary arguments to prove their points. this somewhat favors the lawyer. so reject.
E so lawyer has mentioned only well maintained boats and jumped to conclusion based on that. but what if exhaust can damage not well maintained boats? then the generalization wont stand and weakens the lawyers conclusion. so this does enough to weaken the conclusion.
ExpertsGlobal5
30 Apr 2026, 23:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
E seems the right option.
Reject D because even if sailboat owners were made aware and they would have taken more care, its still a harm caused / prevented due to extra precautions.
Reject D because even if sailboat owners were made aware and they would have taken more care, its still a harm caused / prevented due to extra precautions.
